Phasic and sustained fear in humans elicits distinct patterns of brain activity
Open accessAbstract
Aversive events are typically more debilitating when they occur unpredictably than predictably. Studies in humans and animals indicate that predictable and unpredictable aversive events can induce phasic and sustained fear, respectively. Research in rodents suggests that anatomically related but distinct neural circuits may mediate phasic and sustained fear. We explored this issue in humans by examining threat predictability in three virtual reality contexts, one in which electric shocks were predictably signaled by a cue, a second in which shocks occurred unpredictably but never paired with a cue, and a third in which no shocks were delivered. Evidence of threat-induced phasic and sustained fear was presented using fear ratings and skin conductance. Utilizing recent advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we were able to conduct whole-brain fMRI at relatively high spatial resolution and still have enough sensitivity to detect transient and sustained signal changes in the basal forebrain. We found that both predictable and unpredictable threat evoked transient activity in the dorsal amygdala, but that only unpredictable threat produced sustained activity in a forebrain region corresponding to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis complex. Consistent with animal models hypothesizing a role for the cortex in generating sustained fear, sustained signal increases to unpredictable threat were also found in anterior insula and a frontoparietal cortical network associated with hypervigilance. In addition, unpredictable threat led to transient activity in the ventral amygdala–hippocampal area and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, as well as transient activation and subsequent deactivation of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, limbic structures that have been implicated in the regulation of emotional behavior and stress responses. In line with basic findings in rodents, these results provide evidence that phasic and sustained fear in humans may manifest similar signs of distress, but appear to be associated with different patterns of neural activity in the human basal forebrain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 86 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Ucxt vs Ncxt showed no significant difference in sustained activity in anterior BNST.
“Whereas a comparison between Uons and Nons revealed increased transient activity in anterior BNST (t17=4.41, P<0.001), a comparison between Ucxt and Ncxt showed no significant difference in sustained activity in anterior BNST (t17=1.42, P=0.18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared to the predictable context, the unpredictable context induced enhanced transient activity in the thalamus, mid-cingulate, and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex.
“Compared to the predictable context, the unpredictable context induced enhanced transient activity in the thalamus, mid-cingulate, and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex as well (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The predictable context transiently increased activity bilaterally in the anterior part of the BNST complex compared to the no-shock context.
“As was found in Uons>Nons and Uons>Pons, the predictable context transiently increased activity bilaterally in the anterior part of the BNST complex compared to the no-shock context (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a trend for Ucxt to show greater sustained activity in dorsal BNST relative to Ncxt.
“Consistent with the voxel-wise analyses, there was a trend for Ucxt to show greater sustained activity in dorsal BNST relative to Ncxt (t17=1.82, P=0.08).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Follow-up ROI analyses of left and right dorsal amygdala yielded similar null results for Pcue vs Ncue.
“Follow-up analyses of left and right dorsal amygdala ROIs yielded a similar result (left, t17=0.23, P=0.82; right, t17=0.71, P=0.49).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
Unpredictable threat elicited sustained increased activity in the dorsal portion of the BNST complex, near the supracapsular BNST.
“Importantly, unpredictable threat elicited sustained increased activity in the dorsal portion of the BNST complex (Table 1, Fig. 3C) in the approximate vicinity of the supracapsular BNST.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pcue>Ucue revealed greater brain activity to Pcue than Ucue in a dorsal amygdala region overlapping the Pcue>Ncue activation.
“This contrast revealed greater brain activity to Pcue than Ucue in a region of the dorsal amygdala overlapping the dorsal amygdala activation in Pcue>Ncue (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only unpredictable threat produced sustained activity in a forebrain region corresponding to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis complex.
“but that only unpredictable threat produced sustained activity in a forebrain region corresponding to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis complex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pons vs Nons showed that transient activation of anterior BNST tended to be greater to predictable context than no-shock context.
“In addition, Uons compared to Pons showed that transient activity in anterior BNST was greater to the unpredictable context than the predictable context (t17=2.27, P<0.05), and Pons compared to Nons showed that transient activation of anterior BNST tended to be greater to the predictable context than the no-shock context (t17=1.93, P<0.07).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Under a lenient whole-brain voxel-wise threshold (P<0.05), the unpredictable context showed a sustained deactivation in subgenual anterior cingulate cortex relative to the predictable context.
“However, when whole-brain correction was performed using a voxel-wise threshold of P<0.05, the unpredictable context showed a sustained deactivation in subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sACC) relative to the predictable context (Table 2)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pcue elicited less activity relative to Ucue in the posterior cingulate and precuneus.
“We also found that Pcue elicited less activity relative to Ucue in the posterior cingulate and precuneus (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Unpredictable threat transiently increased activity in the anterior portion of the BNST complex, in the approximate vicinity of the lateral BNST.
“Unpredictable threat transiently increased activity in the anterior portion of the BNST complex (Table 1, Fig. 3B) in the approximate vicinity of the lateral BNST.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unpredictable threat led to transient activation and subsequent deactivation of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex.
“as well as transient activation and subsequent deactivation of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Voxel-wise analyses revealed no activation in dorsal amygdala to unpredictable threat.
“Voxel-wise analyses revealed no activation in dorsal amygdala to unpredictable threat, but our analysis based on ROI data showed that transient activity in dorsal amygdala tended to be greater to the unpredictable context onset than the onset of the no-shock context (t17=1.95, P=0.067).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The trend for increased sustained activity in response to unpredictable threat was present in both hemispheres in dorsal BNST, but relatively stronger in the left hemisphere.
“Follow-up analyses indicated that the trend for increased sustained activity in response to unpredictable threat was present in both hemispheres in dorsal BNST, but relatively stronger in the left hemisphere (left, t17=2.05; P=0.056; right, t17=1.31; P=0.21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The predictable cue produced larger SCRs than the predictable context, no-shock cue, and unpredictable cue.
“Paired t-tests revealed that the predictable cue (Pcue) [ANX: mean (SEM) 7.3 (0.3); SCR: 0.45 (0.06)] was more anxiogenic than the predictable context (Pcxt) [ANX: 4.3 (0.5); t17=6.0, P<0.001; SCR: 0.26 (0.04); t17=5.2, P<0.001] as well as the no-shock cue (Ncue) [ANX: 1.3 (0.3); t17=13.3, P<0.001; SCR: 0.13 (0.03); t17=7.5, P<0.001], and unpredictable cue (Ucue) [ANX: 5.2 (0.5); t17=4.0, P<0.001;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The unpredictable context transiently increased activity in the BNST complex relative to the predictable context.
“As in the contrast with the no-shock context, the unpredictable context transiently increased activity in the BNST complex relative to the predictable context (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unpredictable threat transiently increased activity in subgenual, pregenual, and dorsal anterior cingulate, medial caudate, and medial orbital and middle temporal cortices.
“In addition, we found increased transient activity in subgenual, pregenual, and dorsal regions of the anterior cingulate, the medial caudate, and medial orbital and middle temporal cortices (Table 2 and Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Predictable threat evoked phasic activity in the dorsal amygdala, roughly in the vicinity of the central nucleus of the amygdala.
“Predictable threat evoked phasic activity in the dorsal amygdala (Table 1 and Fig. 3A), roughly in the vicinity of the CeA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No other significant signal changes were detected in the comparison of unpredictable and predictable contexts for sustained activity.
“No other significant signal changes were detected in this comparison.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Uons vs Pons showed that transient activity in anterior BNST was greater to unpredictable context than predictable context.
“In addition, Uons compared to Pons showed that transient activity in anterior BNST was greater to the unpredictable context than the predictable context (t17=2.27, P<0.05), and Pons compared to Nons showed that transient activation of anterior BNST tended to be greater to the predictable context than the no-shock context (t17=1.93, P<0.07).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With a lenient whole-brain voxel-wise threshold (P<0.05), a large cluster in the ventral amygdala and anterior hippocampus showed significant transient activation to unpredictable threat.
“When whole-brain correction was performed using a more lenient voxel-wise threshold (P<0.05), however, a large cluster (360 μl) in the ventral amygdala and anterior hippocampus (24 −2 −17, peak; 26 −4 −15, center-of-mass) showed significant transient activation to unpredictable threat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Relative to baseline, the predictable cue elicited transient activity in dmPFC/dACC among other regions.
“Relative to baseline, the predictable cue elicited transient activity in dmPFC/dACC among other regions (Fig. 4A, Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both predictable and unpredictable threat evoked transient activity in the dorsal amygdala.
“We found that both predictable and unpredictable threat evoked transient activity in the dorsal amygdala”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unpredictable threat led to transient activity in the ventral amygdala-hippocampal area and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex.
“In addition, unpredictable threat led to transient activity in the ventral amygdala–hippocampal area and pregenual anterior cingulate cortex”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the Pcue>Ncue contrast, no other brain regions were statistically significant after correcting for multiple tests.
“No other brain regions were statistically significant after correcting for multiple tests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ROI analysis showed that transient activity in dorsal amygdala tended to be greater to unpredictable context onset than no-shock context onset.
“Voxel-wise analyses revealed no activation in dorsal amygdala to unpredictable threat, but our analysis based on ROI data showed that transient activity in dorsal amygdala tended to be greater to the unpredictable context onset than the onset of the no-shock context (t17=1.95, P=0.067).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Relative to the no-shock context, the predictable context increased transient activity in subgenual and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.
“Relative to the no-shock context, the predictable context also increased transient activity in subgenual and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ROI analysis of the dorsal amygdala failed to detect significantly greater transient activity to Pcue than Ncue.
“Nevertheless, ROI analysis of the dorsal amygdala failed to detect significantly greater transient activity to Pcue than Ncue when comparing mean subject-specific β values for each condition extracted from bilateral dorsal amygdala (t17=0.55, P=0.59).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant linear trend from no-shock to predictable to unpredictable context for fear ratings and SCRs.
“There was also a significant linear trend from Ncxt to Pcxt to Ucxt [ANX: F(1,17)=343.2, P<0.001; SCR: F(1,17)=22.9, P<0.001]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unpredictable threat induced a sustained decrease in activity in subgenual anterior cingulate and medial orbital cortex following a transient increase.
“Following a transient increase in brain activity, unpredictable threat also induced a sustained decrease in activity in subgenual anterior cingulate and medial orbital cortex (Table 2, Fig. 4C and D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Sustained signal increases to unpredictable threat were found in anterior insula and a frontoparietal cortical network associated with hypervigilance.
“sustained signal increases to unpredictable threat were also found in anterior insula and a frontoparietal cortical network associated with hypervigilance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ROI data from bilateral anterior BNST replicated the pattern of results found in voxel-wise analyses.
“Overall, analyses of the ROI data from bilateral anterior BNST replicated the pattern of results found in the voxel-wise analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
One subject's beta value for Ucxt met the Hampel identifier criteria for being an outlier, an unusually small value.
“It is noteworthy that one subject's beta value for Ucxt met the Hampel identifier criteria for being an outlier (Davies and Gather, 1993), in this case, an unusually small value.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davies and Gather, 1993 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The predictable cue produced higher fear ratings than the predictable context, no-shock cue, and unpredictable cue.
“Paired t-tests revealed that the predictable cue (Pcue) [ANX: mean (SEM) 7.3 (0.3); SCR: 0.45 (0.06)] was more anxiogenic than the predictable context (Pcxt) [ANX: 4.3 (0.5); t17=6.0, P<0.001; SCR: 0.26 (0.04); t17=5.2, P<0.001] as well as the no-shock cue (Ncue) [ANX: 1.3 (0.3); t17=13.3, P<0.001; SCR: 0.13 (0.03); t17=7.5, P<0.001], and unpredictable cue (Ucue) [ANX: 5.2 (0.5); t17=4.0, P<0.001;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The unpredictable context produced higher fear ratings than the no-shock context and the predictable context.
“and that the unpredictable context (Ucxt) [ANX: 7.3 (0.3); SCR: 0.33 (0.06)] was more anxiogenic than the no-shock context (Ncxt) [ANX: 0.7 (0.2); t17=18.5, P<0.001; SCR: 0.14 (0.03); t17=4.8, P<0.001] and predictable context (Pcxt) [ANX: 4.3 (0.5); t17=7.7, P<0.001; SCR: 0.26 (0.04); t17=1.8, P=0.09].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Uons vs Nons revealed increased transient activity in anterior BNST.
“Whereas a comparison between Uons and Nons revealed increased transient activity in anterior BNST (t17=4.41, P<0.001), a comparison between Ucxt and Ncxt showed no significant difference in sustained activity in anterior BNST (t17=1.42, P=0.18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fear ratings and SCRs to contexts and cues differed depending on shock predictability (Stimulus Type × Condition interaction).
“Fear ratings (ANX) and skin conductance responses (SCRs) to contexts and cues differed depending on shock predictability [Stimulus Type × Condition interaction, ANX: F(1.6, 27.5)=38.13, P<0.001; Fig. 2A; SCR: F(1.6, 28.5)= 17.74, P<0.001; Fig. 2B].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The present voxel-wise and ROI results indicate that sustained activity in the BNST was restricted to the dorsal part of the BNST complex, roughly corresponding to the supracapsular BNST.
“The present voxel-wise and ROI results indicate that sustained activity in the BNST was restricted to the dorsal part of the BNST complex, roughly corresponding to the supracapsular BNST (Heimer et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heimer et al., 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Only unpredictable threat yielded significant sustained activity in the BNST complex.
“Concurring with animal models of phasic and sustained fear (Davis et al., 2010b), both predictable and unpredictable threat increased transient activity in the dorsal amygdala, but only unpredictable threat yielded significant sustained activity in the BNST complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Predictable threat evoked transient activity in rostral dorsomedial prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.
“Beyond the amygdala, predictable threat evoked transient activity in rostral dorsomedial prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aversive events invoked greater sustained anxiety when they occurred unpredictably than predictably.
“In addition, aversive events invoked greater sustained anxiety when they occurred unpredictably than predictably.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Transient activity in the BNST was greater to the onset of the predictable context than the no-shock context.
“Transient activity in the BNST was also greater to the onset of the predictable context than the no-shock context, as would be expected considering the association between the predictable context and cue-related shock.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Phasic fear responses and transient activity in dorsal amygdala were greater to the predictable cue than the no-shock cue and unpredictable cue.
“In support of this interpretation, phasic fear responses and transient activity in dorsal amygdala were greater to the predictable cue than the no-shock cue and unpredictable cue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unpredictable threat produced sustained activity in anterior insula, mid-cingulate, and frontoparietal cortical networks.
“In support of a role for the cortex in sustained fear, unpredictable threat produced sustained activity in anterior insula, mid-cingulate, and frontoparietal cortical networks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The peak coordinates of amygdala activation to predictable threat are compatible with dorsal amygdala designations in previous fMRI studies.
“In addition, the peak coordinates of the amygdala activation to predictable threat (−22 −5 −8) are compatible with dorsal amygdala designations in previous fMRI studies (Davis et al., 2010a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Trend analyses revealed a trend for a linear effect from Ncxt to Pcxt to Ucxt in bilateral dorsal BNST.
“and a trend for such an effect from Ncxt to Pcxt to Ucxt in bilateral dorsal BNST (Fig. 5C) (F(1, 17)=3.32, P=0.086; left, F(1, 17)=4.21, P=0.055; right, F(1, 17)=1.72, P=0.206).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
ROI analysis revealed that transient activity to unpredictable threat context onset was enhanced in the right dorsal amygdala.
“In support of this view, a ROI analysis revealed that transient activity to unpredictable threat context onset was enhanced in the right dorsal amygdala.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A predictable threat cue evoked transient activation of dmPFC/dACC.
“The present finding that a predictable threat cue evoked transient activation of dmPFC/dACC supports this hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Behaviorally, predictable and unpredictable threat evoked pronounced emotional reactions as indicated by subjective fear ratings and skin conductance.
“Behaviorally, predictable and unpredictable threat evoked pronounced emotional reactions as indicated by subjective fear ratings and skin conductance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Trend analyses on ROI data from the BNST complex revealed a significant linear trend from Nons to Pons to Uons in bilateral anterior BNST.
“In support of this hypothesis, trend analyses performed on ROI data from the BNST complex revealed a significant linear trend from Nons to Pons to Uons in bilateral anterior BNST (Fig. 5B) (F(1, 17)=19.44, P<0.001; left, F(1, 17)=14.45, P=0.0014; right, F(1, 17)=5.80, P=0.027)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Both predictable and unpredictable threat increased transient activity in the dorsal amygdala.
“Concurring with animal models of phasic and sustained fear (Davis et al., 2010b), both predictable and unpredictable threat increased transient activity in the dorsal amygdala, but only unpredictable threat yielded significant sustained activity in the BNST complex.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Neural activity in the posterior cingulate and precuneus were attenuated by the predictable cue compared to the unpredictable cue.
“Neural activity in the posterior cingulate and precuneus were attenuated by the predictable cue compared to the unpredictable cue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the present study, transient activity in the BNST complex was greater to the onset of the unpredictable context than the predictable context.
“In line with this interpretation, in the present study transient activity in the BNST complex was greater to the onset of the unpredictable context than the predictable context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Predictable and unpredictable threat produced different patterns of neural activity in a forebrain region consistent with the extended amygdala.
“Using high-resolution fMRI, we found that predictable and unpredictable threat produced different patterns of neural activity in a forebrain region consistent with the extended amygdala, which encompasses the dorsal amygdala and BNST complex (Heimer et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heimer et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In both voxel-wise and ROI results, transient activity to the onset of unpredictable threat was observed in the anterior part of the BNST complex near the lateral BNST.
“In both the voxel-wise and ROI results of the present study, we observed transient activity to the onset of unpredictable threat in the anterior part of the BNST complex in the approximate vicinity of the lateral BNST.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The inability to replicate the predictable threat effect in the ROI analysis of the dorsal amygdala underscores the tentative nature of conclusions about CeA signals.
“This point is underscored by the inability to replicate the predictable threat effect in the ROI analysis of the dorsal amygdala.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unpredictable threat contexts compared to predictable threat contexts elicited greater transient activity in pregenual anterior cingulate cortex.
“In the present study, unpredictable threat contexts compared to predictable threat contexts elicited greater transient activity in pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pACC), a cingulate subregion that differs from sACC in its cytological and transmitter receptor architecture (Palomero-Gallagher, et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Unpredictable threat induced sustained activity of frontoparietal areas.
“The finding that unpredictable threat induced sustained activity of frontoparietal areas involved in sustained attention (Pardo et al., 1991), is consistent with previous neuroimaging studies linking unpredictable threat to hypervigilance (Carlsson et al., 2006; Hasler et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Anatomical ROI analyses revealed a linear trend in transient and sustained activity in the BNST complex, paralleling a linear trend in contextually induced sustained anxiety as indexed by subjective fear and skin conductance.
“Supporting this prediction, in the present study anatomical ROI analyses revealed a linear trend in transient and sustained activity in the BNST complex, paralleling a linear trend found in contextually induced sustained anxiety as indexed by subjective fear and skin conductance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Neural activity in sACC showed a strong transient increase to the onset of unpredictable threat followed by a sustained decreased response.
“Neural activity in sACC showed a strong transient increase to the onset of unpredictable threat followed by a sustained decreased response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Unpredictable threats generally induce sustained fear, a longer-lasting apprehension elicited by potential or temporally uncertain threat.
“unpredictable threats generally induce sustained fear, a longer-lasting apprehension elicited by potential or temporally uncertain threat (Davis et al., 2010b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Unpredictable threats are generally more harmful than predictable threats.
“suggesting that unpredictable threats are generally more harmful”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A diffuse cue signaling temporally unpredictable threat elicits longer-lasting sustained fear associated with passive defensive behaviors.
“a diffuse cue that signals a temporally unpredictable threat (e.g., a hazardous environment) elicits a longer-lasting anxiety-like state (sustained fear) associated with passive defensive behaviors such as hypervigilance, avoidance, and quiescence (Blanchard and Blanchard, 2008; Grillon, 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Blanchard and Blanchard, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Grillon, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Those effects are usually absent when the same aversive events or threats are predictable.
“These effects are usually not found when the same aversive events or threats are predictable (Grillon et al., 2004; Mineka and Hendersen, 1985)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Previous findings support the hypothesis that a neural circuit within the dorsal amygdala may mediate phasic fear in humans.
“These previous findings support the hypothesis that a neural circuit within the dorsal amygdala may mediate phasic fear in humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Instructed fear studies examining anticipation of and responses to briefly presented aversive pictures revealed dorsal amygdala activation when aversive events were predictably signaled.
“Studies of instructed fear that have examined neural activity underlying both anticipation of and responses to briefly presented aversive pictures have also revealed dorsal amygdala activation (Mackiewicz et al., 2006; Nitschke et al., 2006), provided that the aversive events are predictably signaled (Sarinopoulos et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Few human neuroimaging studies have examined the specific role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in sustained fear.
“While many neuroimaging studies in humans have investigated the role of the amygdala in phasic fear, few have examined the specific role of the BNST in sustained fear (Straube et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Straube et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In humans and animals, unpredictable aversive events cause behavioral, cognitive, and somatic effects resembling those of anxiety and mood disorders.
“In humans and animals, unpredictable aversive events produce debilitating behavioral, cognitive, and somatic effects similar to those found in anxiety and mood disorders (Grillon et al., 2004; Mineka and Kihlstrom, 1978).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Predictable threats typically induce phasic fear, a short-lasting apprehension about imminent threat.
“predictable threats typically induce phasic fear, a short-lasting apprehension concerning imminent threat”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Unpredictable cues were unlikely to serve as signals of safety because subjects were instructed that shock could occur at any time during the unpredictable context.
“Although shocks were never delivered during a cue in Ucxt, it is unlikely that unpredictable cues served as signals of safety since subjects were instructed that a shock could occur at any time during the unpredictable context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Contextually induced sustained anxiety increased linearly across no-shock, predictable, and unpredictable contexts.
“indicating that contextually induced sustained anxiety increased linearly across conditions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The marginal SCR difference between unpredictable and predictable contexts compared with the fear-rating difference probably reflects that SCRs to context onset are less sensitive indicators of sustained fear states.
“Although the SCR difference between Ucxt and Pcxt was marginally significant compared to the ANX difference, probably because SCRs to context onset are less sensitive indicators of sustained fear states”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Combining parallel imaging and voxel volume reduction reduces susceptibility-related signal dropout from tissue interfaces.
“Moreover, combining parallel imaging and voxel volume reduction provides the added benefit of reducing susceptibility-related signal dropout from different tissue interfaces (Bellgowan et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bellgowan et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The results support the view that aversive events produce more sustained anxiety when they occur unpredictably than predictably.
“these results support the view that aversive events produce more sustained anxiety when they occur unpredictably than predictably”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The small size of the CeA, close proximity of surrounding nuclei, and spatial resolution of fMRI make it extremely difficult to localize the specific neuronal source underlying any dorsal amygdala activation.
“However, the relatively small size of the CeA, the close proximity of surrounding nuclei (e.g., basal nucleus of Meynert), and the spatial resolution of fMRI make it extremely difficult to localize the specific neuronal source underlying any dorsal amygdala activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The conclusion that dorsal amygdala activation may reflect involvement of the CeA is supported by previous neuroimaging findings.
“The conclusion that dorsal amygdala activation in the present study may reflect involvement of the CeA is supported by previous neuroimaging findings (Whalen et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Whalen et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Transient neural activity in the dorsal amygdala to a predictable threat cue likely reflected processes in the CeA that lead to a rapid phasic fear response.
“In the present study, transient neural activity in the dorsal amygdala to a predictable threat cue likely reflected processes in the CeA that lead to a rapid phasic fear response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Transient activation in ventral amygdala/anterior hippocampus to unpredictable threat context onset provides further evidence that the amygdala and hippocampus play time-limited roles during sustained aversive contexts.
“Transient activation in ventral amygdala/anterior hippocampus to unpredictable threat context onset provides further evidence that the amygdala (Alvarez et al., 2008; Davis et al., 2010b) and hippocampus (Marschner et al., 2008) play time-limited roles during sustained aversive contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Data in rodents and humans suggest that sustained states of apprehension, including contextually induced anxiety, may stem in part from neural activity in the BNST.
“Data in rodents and humans suggest that sustained states of apprehension, including contextually induced anxiety, may stem in part from neural activity in the BNST (Davis et al., 2010b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Detection of amygdala activation in instructed fear studies has been somewhat unreliable.
“It is worth noting however, that detection of amygdala activation in instructed fear studies has been somewhat unreliable (Mechias et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mechias et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Transient neural activity in the ventral amygdala to unpredictable threat reflected processes in the BLC that lead to activation of the extended amygdala.
“We suggest that transient neural activity in the ventral amygdala to unpredictable threat reflected processes in the BLC that lead to activation of the extended amygdala.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is possible that the supracapsular and lateral BNST function together to bring about sustained anxiety.
“therefore, it is possible that these continuous components of the extended amygdala function together to bring about sustained anxiety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Transient activity in the dorsal amygdala to the onset of an unpredictable threat context may reflect processes in the CeA that lead to the initiation of sustained fear.
“We suggest that transient activity in the dorsal amygdala to the onset of an unpredictable threat context may reflect processes in the CeA that lead to the initiation of sustained fear.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The basolateral amygdala and lateral CeA provide extensive inputs to both the supracapsular and lateral BNST.
“Supporting the notion that the supracapsular and lateral BNST might function together to generate sustained anxiety, the basolateral amygdala and lateral CeA provide extensive inputs to both the supracapsular and lateral BNST (Shammah-Lagnado et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shammah-Lagnado et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Straube et al. (2007) reported increased activity in a similar region of the BNST in phobics relative to controls during anticipation of phobia-related pictures.
“Straube et al. (2007) reported increased activity in a similar region of the BNST in phobics relative to controls during the anticipation of phobia-related pictures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Straube et al. (2007) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A sustained decrease following a transient increase in sACC activity might reflect changes in the regulation of visceral reactions during threat exposure.
“This suggests that a sustained decrease that follows a transient increase in sACC activity might reflect changes in the regulation of visceral reactions during threat exposure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Data in rodents and humans support the hypothesis that the amygdala and BNST form the core of a neural system underlying phasic and sustained states of apprehension.
“Data in rodents and humans (Davis et al., 2010b) support the hypothesis that the amygdala and BNST form the core of a neural system underlying phasic and sustained states of apprehension.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
As the duration of threat persists, transient activation of the dorsal amygdala gives way to activation of the BNST complex to help maintain anxiety.
“As the duration of threat persists, transient activation of the dorsal amygdala gives way to activation of the BNST complex to help maintain anxiety.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Cues that predictably signal imminent threat evoke a short-duration fear response mediated by transient activity in the dorsal amygdala.
“We propose that cues that predictably signal imminent threat evoke a short-duration fear response mediated by transient activity in the dorsal amygdala.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Sustained neural activity in the anterior insula to unpredictable threat likely reflects modulation of visceral arousal during apprehension.
“On the basis of its connections to the extended amygdala and brainstem (McDonald et al., 1999; Pascoe and Kapp, 1987), it may be more parsimonious to posit that sustained neural activity in the anterior insula to unpredictable threat likely reflects modulation of visceral arousal during apprehension.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McDonald et al., 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pascoe and Kapp, 1987
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The observation that unpredictable threat produced significantly sustained activity in a brain region corresponding to the BNST, and not the dorsal amygdala, is consistent with the hypothesis that sustained fear may depend on different neural mechanisms in the extended amygdala than phasic fear.
“The observation that unpredictable threat produced significantly sustained activity in a brain region corresponding to the BNST, and not the dorsal amygdala, is consistent with the hypothesis that sustained fear may depend on different neural mechanisms in the extended amygdala than phasic fear (Davis et al., 2010b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The presence of a significant signal change to unpredictable threat and absence of such a change to predictable threat does not demonstrate a significant difference between the two threat conditions.
“It is important to interpret this finding cautiously, however, because the presence of a significant signal change to unpredictable threat, and the absence of such a change to predictable threat, does not demonstrate a significant difference between the two threat conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The model predicts that increases in sustained anxiety should be paralleled by increases in BNST activation.
“The model outlined above predicts that increases in sustained anxiety should be paralleled by increases in BNST activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 39
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 47
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTransient activation of the ventral amygdala to unpredictable threat was present but not statistically significant after correction.
“Transient activation of the ventral amygdala was present but not statistically significant after correction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no significant differences in sustained activity in the extended amygdala between unpredictable and predictable contexts, or between predictable and no-shock contexts.
“We found no significant differences in sustained activity in the extended amygdala between unpredictable and predictable contexts, or predictable and no-shock contexts (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe unpredictable context produced larger SCRs than the no-shock context; its SCR difference from the predictable context was marginal (P=0.09).
“and that the unpredictable context (Ucxt) [ANX: 7.3 (0.3); SCR: 0.33 (0.06)] was more anxiogenic than the no-shock context (Ncxt) [ANX: 0.7 (0.2); t17=18.5, P<0.001; SCR: 0.14 (0.03); t17=4.8, P<0.001] and predictable context (Pcxt) [ANX: 4.3 (0.5); t17=7.7, P<0.001; SCR: 0.26 (0.04); t17=1.8, P=0.09].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFollow-up analyses showed increased transient activity in response to unpredictable threat was significant in the right dorsal amygdala but not the left.
“Follow-up analyses indicated that increased transient activity in response to unpredictable threat was significant in the right dorsal amygdala but not the left (Fig. 5A; left, t17=0.58; P=0.57; right, t17=2.57; P=0.02).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe predictable context generated sustained increased activity in superior and middle frontal cortex, and sustained decreased activity in the cerebellum and medial orbital cortex relative to the no-shock context.
“The predictable context also generated sustained increased activity in superior and middle frontal cortex, and sustained decreased activity in the cerebellum and medial orbital cortex relative to the no-shock context (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith the outlier removed, the difference in sustained activity between Ucxt and Ncxt was significant in bilateral dorsal BNST and left dorsal BNST, but not right.
“With this value temporarily removed from the analysis, the difference in sustained activity between Ucxt and Ncxt was significant in bilateral dorsal BNST (t16=2.27, P=0.037) and left dorsal BNST (left, t16=2.89, P=0.011; right, t16=1.44, P=0.17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataSubjects rated the shock level used in the study as moderately painful (mean 3.4, SD 0.4) on a 1-5 scale.
“Subjects rated the shock level used in the study as moderately painful (mean=3.4; SD=0.4) based on a 1–5 scale (1, not at all; 3, moderately; 5, extremely).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe peak coordinates of right BNST activation for predictable threat were identical to those for unpredictable threat onset, while left BNST coordinates were slightly more posteromedial and ventral.
“The peak coordinates of the right BNST (9 0 10) activation were identical to those associated with the onset of unpredictable threat, but the peak coordinates of the left BNST (−6 0 6) activation were slightly more posteromedial and ventral compared to those associated with unpredictable threat onset (−9 2 10 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnpredictable threat elicited sustained increased activity in anterior insula, frontal (superior, inferior, middle, frontopolar), inferior parietal cortical regions, and mid-cingulate.
“We also found sustained increased activity in anterior insula, frontal (superior, inferior, middle, frontopolar) and inferior parietal cortical regions, and the mid-cingulate (Table 2, Fig. 4C and D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo significant differences were found in sustained activity in dorsal BNST between unpredictable and predictable contexts, or predictable and no-shock contexts.
“As in the voxel-wise analyses, no significant differences were found in sustained activity in dorsal BNST between unpredictable and predictable contexts (Ucxt>Pcxt, t17=1.13, P=0.28), or predictable and no-shock contexts (Pcxt>Ncxt, t17=0.75, P=0.47).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith the outlier removed, the linear trend in sustained activity across contexts was significant in bilateral dorsal BNST and left dorsal BNST, but not right.
“Note that with the previously indentified “outlier” removed from the analysis, the linear trend in sustained activity across contexts was significant in bilateral dorsal BNST (F(1, 16)=5.17, P=0.037) and left dorsal BNST (left; F(1, 16)=8.37, P=0.010; right, F(1, 16)=2.07, P=0.169).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth predictable and unpredictable threat contexts evoked transient activity in sACC, and thereafter unpredictable threat contexts were associated with a greater sustained decrease in sACC activity.
“Whereas both predictable and unpredictable threat contexts evoked transient activity in sACC, thereafter unpredictable threat contexts were associated with a greater sustained decrease in sACC activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRodent data suggest phasic fear responses rely on the central nucleus of the amygdala, which in humans is located in the dorsal part of the amygdala.
“Rodent data suggest that phasic fear responses rely on the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), which in humans is located in the dorsal part of the amygdala (Amunts et al., 2005)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA brief discrete cue that predictably signals imminent threat evokes rapid phasic fear and active defensive responses.
“a brief, discrete cue that predictably signals an imminent threat evokes a rapid apprehensive state (phasic fear) that diminishes quickly once the threat is terminated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAnimal models of sustained fear posit that cortical inputs from the insula may underlie sustained fear, possibly mediating cognitive components of anxious apprehension.
“animal models of sustained fear posit that cortical inputs from the insula may also underlie sustained fear, possibly mediating cognitive components of anxious apprehension (Davis et al., 2010b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McDonald et al., 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHuman neuroimaging studies have implicated the amygdala in fear acquisition and extinction.
“neuroimaging studies in humans have likewise implicated the amygdala in fear acquisition and extinction (Buchel et al., 1998; LaBar et al., 1998; Milad et al., 2007; Phelps et al., 2004)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSomerville et al. (2010) recently examined the role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in anxiety-related vigilance.
“However, Somerville et al. (2010) recently examined the role of the BNST in anxious-related vigilance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Somerville et al. (2010) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRodent data suggest that highly related but partially distinct functional neuroanatomical networks may underlie phasic and sustained fear.
“Rodent data suggest that highly related but partially distinct functional neuroanatomical networks may underlie phasic and sustained fear (Davis et al., 2010b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study used a well-validated instructed threat procedure and neuroimaging methods that assured good signal detection of transient cue- and context-related responses and sustained context-related responses in the basal forebrain.
“We tested these predictions using a well-validated instructed threat procedure (Davis et al., 2010b; Grillon et al., 2004), and neuroimaging methods that assured good signal detection of transient cue- and context-related responses, as well as sustained context-related responses in the basal forebrain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Grillon et al., 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSustained fear responses depend on the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, located in the ventromedial basal forebrain and receiving input from the central nucleus of the amygdala and the basolateral amygdala complex.
“sustained fear responses are dependent on the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), which is located in the ventromedial basal forebrain and receives input from the CeA and the more ventrally located basolateral amygdala complex (BLC) (Walker and Davis, 2008)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walker and Davis, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHasler et al. (2007) found that a visual threat cue increased cerebral blood flow in the left amygdala relative to a comparable safe cue.
“Hasler et al. (2007) found that a visual threat cue increased cerebral blood flow in the left amygdala relative to a comparable safe cue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hasler et al. (2007) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe central nucleus of the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis project to the same neural mediators of fear symptoms, so each component of the extended amygdala can generate defensive responses.
“Because the CeA and BNST project to the same neural mediators of fear symptoms, each of these components of the extended amygdala are capable of generating defensive responses (Davis and Whalen, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis and Whalen, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnterior insula has strong projections to medial prefrontal cortical regions associated with regulation of emotions and visceral reactions.
“an area that also has strong projections to medial prefrontal cortical regions associated with the regulation of emotions and visceral reactions (Price and Drevets, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Price and Drevets, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPhelps et al. (2001) found that a threat cue, relative to a safe cue, evoked enhanced arousal and fear indexed by skin conductance and rapid short-lasting activation in left dorsal amygdala, even though no shocks were administered.
“Though no shocks were ever administered, the threat cue evoked enhanced arousal and fear as indexed by skin conductance, and relative to the safe cue, produced a rapid and short-lasting activation in left dorsal amygdala.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Phelps et al. (2001) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLPC cost functional alignment provides superior spatial alignment between T2*- and T1-weighted images near ventricles compared to generic cost functionals.
“compared to generic cost functionals, provides superior spatial alignment between T2*- and T1-weighted images in brain structures near the ventricles (Saad et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saad et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationA multi-element surface coil array and parallel imaging allowed whole-brain fMRI at about four times higher spatial resolution (1.7 × 1.7 × 3.5 mm3) with enough sensitivity to detect BOLD signal changes.
“This allowed us to conduct whole-brain fMRI at roughly 4 times higher spatial resolution (1.7 × 1.7 × 3.5 mm3) and still have enough sensitivity to detect BOLD signal changes (Bodurka et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
PremisecitationAnimal models of sustained fear hypothesize that a part of the CeA different from that involved in phasic fear may be transiently involved in initiating sustained fear.
“Because animal models of sustained fear hypothesize that a part of the CeA different from that involved in phasic fear may be transiently involved in initiating sustained fear (Davis et al., 2010b), we tested for a transient fear response to unpredictable threat in bilateral dorsal amygdala.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationA log transformation and range correction were performed to normalize the distribution and reduce error variance.
“A log transformation (log [1 + SCR]) was performed to normalize the distribution, and the magnitudes were range corrected (SCR/SCRmax) for each subject to attain statistical normality and to reduce error variance (Lykken and Venables, 1971).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lykken and Venables, 1971
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationStatistical conclusions concerning the extended amygdala were based on small volume correction for multiple tests.
“statistical conclusions concerning the extended amygdala were based on small volume correction (SVC) for multiple tests (Worsley et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Worsley et al., 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAnatomical delineation of the BNST used a standardized protocol by a trained research assistant blind to subjects' identity, and adherence was assessed by the first author.
“Anatomical delineation of the BNST was performed using a standardized protocol by a trained research assistant blind to the subjects' identity and adherence to the protocol was assessed by the first author.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results confirm that under predictable threat, the cue elicited a phasic apprehensive state greater than other cues and greater than the predictable context without a cue.
“These results also confirm that under predictable threat, the cue elicited a phasic apprehensive state that was greater than that elicited by other cues, and greater than the predictable context in the absence of a cue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe absence of cues in the predictable context may have signaled relative safety, but the predictable context was not safe in an absolute sense because it was associated with cue-related shock.
“Therefore, the absence of cues in Pcxt may have signaled relative safety; however, unlike Ncxt, Pcxt was not a safe context in an absolute sense because Pcxt was associated with cue-related shock, much like the context in background contextual conditioning studies (Calandreau et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Calandreau et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAlphaSim correction resulted in a minimum cluster size threshold of 40 mm3 for the extended amygdala and 120 mm3 for other brain regions.
“The above correction procedures resulted in a minimum cluster size threshold of 40 mm3 for the extended amygdala, and a minimum cluster size threshold of 120 mm3 for all other brain regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningEPI data were not spatially filtered or smoothed to optimize detection of fMRI signal changes from small brain structures and avoid reduction in spatial resolution.
“To optimize our ability to detect fMRI signal changes from small brain structures and to avoid any reduction in spatial resolution, we did not spatially filter or smooth the EPI data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningContext onset was unlikely to be associated with any specific cue within a context because entry occurred at several locations.
“Since entry into each context occurred at several locations within the VR environment, it is unlikely that the onset of a context would be associated with any specific cue within a context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationImaging at higher spatial resolution can decrease partial volume effects but can reduce MRI signal-to-noise ratio.
“Imaging at a higher spatial resolution can decrease partial volume effects but can come at the cost of a reduced MRI signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (Edelstein et al., 1986).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Edelstein et al., 1986 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenRetrospective fear ratings obtained immediately after scanning were used to confirm understanding of the threat instructions.
“Retrospective fear ratings obtained immediately following scanning were used to confirm understanding of the threat instructions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious studies of instructed fear using simple threat cues have associated phasic fear responses with a left hemisphere bias.
“Previous studies of instructed fear using simple threat cues (e.g., colored squares) have associated phasic fear responses with a left hemisphere bias (Phelps et al., 2001; Funayama et al., 2001; Hasler et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFour subjects were excluded because of excessive shock-related head motion (n=1), failure of the shock delivery system (n=2), and scanner malfunction (n=1).
“Besides the 18 subjects included in the study, 4 were excluded because of excessive shock-related head motion (n=1), failure of the shock delivery system (n=2), and scanner malfunction (n=1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAll subjects exhibited minimal head motion during imaging (mean 2.1 mm, SD 1.6).
“All subjects in the study exhibited minimal head motion during imaging (mean= 2.1 mm, SD=1.6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSimilarly constructed VR stimuli are effective for studying context manipulations in the MRI environment.
“Previous research in our laboratory has shown that similarly constructed VR stimuli are effective for studying context manipulations in the MRI environment (Alvarez et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alvarez et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTo ensure subjects understood the threat procedure, they were exposed to the VR contexts and tone before the study and required to paraphrase the shock and no-shock contingencies.
“To ensure that subjects understood the threat procedure, they were exposed to the VR contexts and tone prior to the study, and were required to paraphrase the shock and no-shock contingencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenQuality of coregistration between EPI and anatomical datasets was visually verified for each subject.
“The quality of coregistration between EPI and anatomical datasets was visually verified for each subject.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenContext assignment was counterbalanced across subjects for which environment was associated with predictable versus unpredictable shock; the restaurant was always the no-shock context.
“Context assignment was reversed for the remaining subjects so as to counterbalance across subjects which environment was associated with predictable and unpredictable shock; the virtual restaurant was always the no-shock context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningSCRs contaminated by a shock or an early cue were omitted from analyses, so SCR data were not affected by nuisance factors.
“SCRs to cue and context onset that were contaminated by a shock, or an early cue in the case of a context, were omitted from analyses, assuring that the SCR data were not affected by nuisance factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPhasic and sustained fear in humans may manifest similar signs of distress but appear associated with different patterns of neural activity in the human basal forebrain.
“these results provide evidence that phasic and sustained fear in humans may manifest similar signs of distress, but appear to be associated with different patterns of neural activity in the human basal forebrain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningBecause subjects were forewarned of the threat associated with each cue, subjects encountering a predictable cue would be expected to engage in conscious appraisal of imminent threat.
“Because subjects in the present study were forewarned of the threat associated with each cue, subjects encountering a predictable cue would be expected to engage in conscious appraisal of imminent threat.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPrevious studies show a rapid reduction in amygdala activation over time in fear conditioning and threat of shock.
“It is also consistent with previous studies showing a rapid reduction in amygdala activation over time in fear conditioning (Buchel et al., 1998; LaBar et al., 1998) and threat of shock (Phelps et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationStudies in rodents, primates, and humans demonstrate a role for the CeA in mediating behavioral and physiological responses evoked by conditioned and unconditioned stimuli including contexts.
“This result is consistent with studies in rodents, primates, and humans that demonstrate a role for the CeA in mediating behavioral and physiological responses evoked by conditioned and unconditioned stimuli including contexts (Davis and Whalen, 2001; Kalin et al., 2004; LeDoux, 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAny conclusions regarding fMRI signals in the CeA must remain tentative.
“Hence, any conclusions regarding fMRI signals in the CeA must remain tentative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch indicates that the BLC is well positioned to receive incoming sensory information concerning threats and to convey this information to output areas including the CeA and BNST.
“This conjecture is supported by research indicating that the BLC is well positioned to receive incoming sensory information concerning threats in the environment, and to convey this information to output areas including the CeA and BNST (Amaral et al., 1992; Dong et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Amaral et al., 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dong et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe null finding is perplexing considering that ROIs typically increase the power to detect an effect.
“This null finding is perplexing considering that ROIs typically increase the power to detect an effect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe posterior cingulate and precuneus are part of a cortical midline network associated with self-referential processing in the spatial domain.
“The posterior cingulate and precuneus are part of a cortical midline network associated with self-referential processing in the spatial domain (Northoff et al., 2006)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Northoff et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt has been suggested that anterior insula might mediate cognitive aspects of worry.
“It has been suggested that anterior insula might mediate cognitive aspects of worry (Walker and Davis, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walker and Davis, 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to this model, cortical and subcortical input converge on the basolateral amygdala and lateral CeA, which project to the lateral BNST and trigger a cascade of neurochemical release, resulting in a relatively long-lasting apprehensive state.
“According to this model, cortical and subcortical input converge on the basolateral amygdala and lateral CeA, which in turn project to the lateral BNST and trigger a cascade of neurochemical release, resulting in a relatively long-lasting apprehensive state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe supracapsular BNST is a small basal forebrain structure that is relatively well developed in humans.
“The supracapsular BNST is a small basal forebrain structure that is relatively well developed in humans (Strenge et al., 1977).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Strenge et al., 1977
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA comparable area of the BNST has been associated with hypervigilant threat monitoring.
“A comparable area of the BNST has been associated with hypervigilant threat monitoring (Somerville et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Somerville et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningImminent threats likely evoke greater phasic fear than temporally unpredictable threats, but the latter may give rise to greater vigilance.
“suggesting that imminent threats likely evoke greater phasic fear than temporally unpredictable threats, but the latter may give rise to greater vigilance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStraube et al. (2007) interpreted their finding as evidence for BNST involvement in anticipatory anxiety because enhanced activity occurred during an anticipatory period of 10-28 s.
“Because enhanced activity in the BNST occurred during an anticipatory period of 10–28 s, Straube et al. (2007) interpreted their finding as evidence for BNST involvement in anticipatory anxiety.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Straube et al. (2007) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThis proposal is compatible with a recently described neural model of sustained fear.
“This proposal is compatible with a recently described neural model of sustained fear (Davis et al., 2010b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2010b
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe supracapsular and lateral BNST share a similar cellular and neurochemical makeup, and the supracapsular BNST merges into and shares afferent and efferent pathways with the lateral BNST.
“The supracapsular and lateral BNST share a similar cellular and neurochemical makeup, and the supracapsular BNST merges into and shares afferent and efferent pathways with the lateral BNST (Shammah-Lagnado et al., 2000)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shammah-Lagnado et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationConscious appraisal processes have been hypothesized to involve a neural circuit including the dmPFC/dACC.
“Conscious appraisal processes have been hypothesized to involve a neural circuit including the dmPFC/dACC (Mechias et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mechias et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis may account for the dynamic pattern of activation observed in sACC in response to unpredictable threat.
“This may account for the dynamic pattern of activation observed in sACC in response to unpredictable threat.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataContexts that signal a longer duration threat initially elicit transient activity in the ventral amygdala/hippocampus and dorsal amygdala, with the former structures possibly being responsible for activation of the latter.
“Contexts that signal a longer duration threat initially elicit transient activity in the ventral amygdala/hippocampus and dorsal amygdala, with the former structures possibly being responsible for activation of the latter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSubgenual anterior cingulate cortex is central to the medial prefrontal network associated with mood and anxiety dysregulation and implicated in regulation of visceral responses during stress and anxiety.
“Subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sACC) is central to the medial prefrontal network that has been associated with mood and anxiety dysregulation, and has been implicated in the regulation of visceral responses during stress and anxiety (Price and Drevets, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Price and Drevets, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLong-duration states of anxiety engender hypervigilance mediated by frontoparietal networks, and modulation of visceral function via mechanisms within anterior insula, pACC and sACC.
“In addition, we suggest that long-duration states of anxiety engender hypervigilance mediated by frontoparietal networks, and modulation of visceral function via mechanisms within anterior insula, pACC and sACC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFrontoparietal areas are involved in sustained attention.
“The finding that unpredictable threat induced sustained activity of frontoparietal areas involved in sustained attention (Pardo et al., 1991), is consistent with previous neuroimaging studies linking unpredictable threat to hypervigilance (Carlsson et al., 2006; Hasler et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pardo et al., 1991 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationpACC differs from sACC in its cytological and transmitter receptor architecture.
“In the present study, unpredictable threat contexts compared to predictable threat contexts elicited greater transient activity in pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (pACC), a cingulate subregion that differs from sACC in its cytological and transmitter receptor architecture (Palomero-Gallagher, et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Palomero-Gallagher, et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe activations observed in the medial prefrontal network are consistent with previous imaging studies implicating medial prefrontal cortex in distal threat, and suggest that contextually induced sustained anxiety may involve complex oscillations in neural activity in key prefrontal regions such as pACC and sACC.
“Although the medial prefrontal network was not the focus of this study, the activations observed in this network are consistent with previous imaging studies implicating medial prefrontal cortex in distal threat (Mobbs et al., 2009), and suggest that contextually induced sustained anxiety may involve complex oscillations in neural activity in key prefrontal regions such as pACC and sACC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mobbs et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious neuroimaging findings indicate that contextual fear conditioning elicits sustained activity in anterior insula.
“Previous neuroimaging findings indicating that contextual fear conditioning elicits sustained activity in anterior insula are consistent with this interpretation (Alvarez et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Alvarez et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe present study conducted whole-brain fMRI at about 4 times higher spatial resolution than typical fMRI studies, yet still had sufficient sensitivity to detect small signal changes in the basal forebrain.
“Notwithstanding the limitations of this investigation, the present study took advantage of recent advances in fMRI data acquisition and processing, allowing us to conduct whole-brain fMRI at about 4 times higher spatial resolution than typical fMRI studies, yet still have sufficient sensitivity to detect small signal changes in the basal forebrain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationClinical studies indicate that metabolism in sACC is elevated in the depressed phase relative to the remitted phase of the same patients with major depressive disorder.
“Clinical studies indicate that metabolism in sACC is elevated in the depressed phase relative to the remitted phase of the same patients with major depressive disorder (Drevets et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Drevets et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataPredictable and unpredictable threats can induce phasic and sustained fear in humans, and these apprehensive states elicit distinct patterns of activation in the basal forebrain including, potentially, the extended amygdala.
“To sum up, the present study suggests that predictable and unpredictable threats can induce phasic and sustained fear in humans, and that these apprehensive states elicit distinct patterns of activation in the basal forebrain including, potentially, the extended amygdala.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious neuroimaging studies link unpredictable threat to hypervigilance.
“The finding that unpredictable threat induced sustained activity of frontoparietal areas involved in sustained attention (Pardo et al., 1991), is consistent with previous neuroimaging studies linking unpredictable threat to hypervigilance (Carlsson et al., 2006; Hasler et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationown dataThe present study provides further support for this hypothesis.
“The present study provides further support for this hypothesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenConscious appraisal of predictable threat cues may activate threat evaluation processes in dmPFC/dACC.
“Conscious appraisal of predictable threat cues may activate threat evaluation processes in dmPFC/dACC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
It is currently unclear whether similar mechanisms support the expression of phasic and sustained fear in humans.
“It is currently unclear whether similar mechanisms support the expression of phasic and sustained fear in humans.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Standard fMRI voxel volumes are typically not small enough to decrease partial volume effects nor provide the spatial resolution required to detect fMRI signal changes from small brain regions.
“Standard fMRI voxel volumes (e.g., 3.8 × 3.8 × 4.0 mm3) are typically not small enough to decrease partial volume effects nor do they provide the spatial resolution required to detect fMRI signal changes from small brain regions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The transition at context onset prevented unwanted orienting responses.
“This transition at context onset prevented unwanted orienting responses.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The BST appears to be involved in anticipatory anxiety and threat monitoring.
“Also, it appears to be involved in anticipatory anxiety and threat monitoring.[32][33][34]”
From Electrical stimulation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis alleviates severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [32]
Alvarez et al (2011) and Mobbs et al (2010) both show amygdala activation during threat conditions, consistent with the amygdala's established role in evaluating threat.
“both Alvarez et al (2011) and Mobbs et al (2010) also show amygdala activation during threat conditions, highlighting the well-documented role of the amygdala in evaluating threat”
From The human BNST: functional role in anxiety and addiction (2016) · cites this paper as Alvarez et al (2011)
In the NPU-threat task, the BNST was active during unpredictable threat but not predictable threat, whereas the amygdala showed the opposite pattern.
“Alvarez et al (2011) used the NPU-threat task to examine brain responses during unpredictable contexts compared with predictable contexts.Analogous to findings in rodents, the BNST was active during unpredictable threat ('anxiety') conditions but not during predictable threat ('fear') conditions, whereas the amygdala showed the opposite pattern-the amygdala was active during predictable threat”
From The human BNST: functional role in anxiety and addiction (2016) · cites this paper as Alvarez et al (2011)
Statistics that don’t add up
Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.
Inconsistent p-value: F(1, 17)=4.21, p = .055
MinorThe paper reports p = .055 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .056. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .055 · recomputed p = .056
“F(1, 17)=4.21, P=0.055”
Inconsistent p-value: F(1, 17)=5.80, p = .027
MinorThe paper reports p = .027 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .028. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .027 · recomputed p = .028
“F(1, 17)=5.80, P=0.027”
Inconsistent p-value: F(1, 16)=8.37, p = .010
MinorThe paper reports p = .01 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .011. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.
Reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .011
“F(1, 16)=8.37, P=0.010”
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 17) = 5.8reported p = .027 · recomputed p = .028
“F(1, 17)=5.80, p = .027”
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 17) = 4.21reported p = .055 · recomputed p = .056
“F(1, 17)=4.21, p = .055”
- Doesn’t add upF(1, 16) = 8.37reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .011
“F(1, 16)=8.37, p = .010”
- Not confirmedF(1, 17) = 1.72reported p = .206 · recomputed p = .207
“F(1, 17)=1.72, p = .206”
- ConsistentF(1.6, 27.5) = 38.13reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(1.6, 27.5)=38.13, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(1.6, 28.5) = 17.74reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(1.6, 28.5)= 17.74, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(1, 17) = 343.2reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(1,17)=343.2, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(1, 17) = 22.9reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(1,17)=22.9, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(1, 17) = 19.44reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“F(1, 17)=19.44, p < .001”
- ConsistentF(1, 17) = 14.45reported p = .0014 · recomputed p = .001
“F(1, 17)=14.45, p = .0014”
- ConsistentF(1, 17) = 3.32reported p = .086 · recomputed p = .086
“F(1, 17)=3.32, p = .086”
- ConsistentF(1, 16) = 5.17reported p = .037 · recomputed p = .037
“F(1, 16)=5.17, p = .037”
- ConsistentF(1, 16) = 2.07reported p = .169 · recomputed p = .169
“F(1, 16)=2.07, p = .169”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798 · see citing works
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913 · see citing works
LeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444 · see citing works
Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain
Laitinen, L. (1989) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/0303-8467(89)90128-5 · Cited by 7,565 · see citing works
Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy
Stern, C. D. (1986) · Neurochemistry International · doi:10.1016/0197-0186(86)90021-5 · Cited by 4,159 · see citing works
The amygdala: vigilance and emotion
Davis, M., & Whalen, P. J. (2001) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000812 · Cited by 2,882 · see citing works
Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self
Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002 · Cited by 2,792 · see citing works
Phelps, E. A., Delgado, M. R., Nearing, K. I., & LeDoux, J. E. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.042 · Cited by 1,753 · see citing works
Neurocircuitry of Mood Disorders
Price, J. L., & Drevets, W. C. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.104 · Cited by 1,606 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Therefore, we further hypothesized that the threat of unpredictable shock would generate sustained activity in anterior insula, an area that also has strong projections to medial prefrontal cortical regions associated with the regulation of emotions and visceral reactions (Price and Drevets, 2010).”
InfluentialThe amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory, and mental dysfunction.
Aggleton, J. P. (1992) · Wiley-Liss eBooks · Cited by 1,536 · see citing works
Phasic vs Sustained Fear in Rats and Humans: Role of the Extended Amygdala in Fear vs Anxiety
Davis, M., Walker, D. L., Miles, L., & Grillon, C. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.109 · Cited by 1,488 · cited 13× · see citing works
“To identify the neural mechanisms that underlie fear expression, however, it may be more advantageous to examine instructed fear in humans rather than fear conditioning (Davis et al., 2010b).”
InfluentialSelf-citationJeurgen, K., Assheuer, J., & Paxinos, G. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,403 · see citing works
LaBar, K. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., LeDoux, J. E., & Phelps, E. A. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80475-4 · Cited by 1,402 · see citing works
Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography
Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/349061a0 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
The amygdala: Neurobiological aspects of emotion, memory and mental dysfunction
Scheel-Krüger, J. (1993) · Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/0891-0618(93)90037-5 · Cited by 1,277 · see citing works
Amunts, K., Kedo, O., Kindler, M., Pieperhoff, P., Mohlberg, H., Shah, N. J., Habel, U., Schneider, F., & Zilles, K. (2005) · Anatomy and Embryology · doi:10.1007/s00429-005-0025-5 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Alheid, G. F., & Heimer, L. (1988) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(88)90217-5 · Cited by 1,217 · see citing works
Milad, M. R., Wright, C. I., Orr, S. P., Pitman, R. K., Quirk, G. J., & Rauch, S. L. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.10.011 · Cited by 1,197 · see citing works
Discovering Endophenotypes for Major Depression
Hasler, G., Drevets, W. C., Manji, H. K., & Charney, D. S. (2004) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300506 · Cited by 1,123 · see citing works
The subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in mood disorders
Drevets, W. C., Savitz, J., & Trimble, M. (2008) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s1092852900013754 · Cited by 1,109 · see citing works
Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear
Fanselow, M. S. (1994) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210947 · Cited by 1,000 · see citing works
DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF SKIN CONDUCTANCE: A PROPOSAL FOR STANDARDIZATION
Lykken, D. T., & Venables, P. H. (1971) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1971.tb00501.x · Cited by 988 · see citing works
Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: an event-related fMRI study
Büchel, C., Morris, J., Dolan, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (1998) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80476-6 · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Activation of the left amygdala to a cognitive representation of fear
Phelps, E. A., O'Connor, K. J., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., Grillon, C., & Davis, M. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/86110 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Self-citationThe intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging
Edelstein, W. A., Glover, G. H., Hardy, C. J., & Redington, R. W. (1986) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910030413 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Topography of projections from amygdala to bed nuclei of the stria terminalis
Dong, H.-W., Petrovich, G. D., & Swanson, L. W. (2001) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00079-0 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
The identification of multiple outliers
Davies, L., & Gather, U. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476339 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
A functional MRI study of human amygdala responses to facial expressions of fear versus anger.
Whalen, P. J., Shin, L. M., McInerney, S. C., Fischer, H., Wright, C. I., & Rauch, S. L. (2001) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.1.1.70 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
The Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy with MRI, and Blood Supply
Duvernoy, H. M., Bourgouin, P. M., & Vannson, J. L. (1999) · Cited by 520 · see citing works
From threat to fear: the neural organization of defensive fear systems in humans.
Mobbs, D., Marchant, J. L., Hassabis, D., Seymour, B., Tan, G., Gray, M., Petrovic, P., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2378-09.2009 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Models and mechanisms of anxiety: evidence from startle studies
Grillon, C. (2008) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-007-1019-1 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala in Mediating Fear and Anxiety in the Primate
Kalin, N. H., Shelton, S. E., & Davidson, R. J. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0292-04.2004 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation
Saad, Z. S., Glen, D. R., Chen, G., Beauchamp, M. S., Desai, R., & Cox, R. W. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.037 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Self-citationFunctional neuroanatomy of aversion and its anticipation
Nitschke, J. B., Sarinopoulos, I., Mackiewicz, K. L., Schaefer, H. S., & Davidson, R. J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.068 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of instructed fear studies: implications for conscious appraisal of threat
Mechias, M.-L., Etkin, A., & Kalisch, R. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.040 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Human Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Indexes Hypervigilant Threat Monitoring
Somerville, L. H., Whalen, P. J., & Kelley, W. M. (2010) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.002 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Anxious Responses to Predictable and Unpredictable Aversive Events.
Grillon, C., Baas, J. P., Lissek, S., Smith, K., & Milstein, J. (2004) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.118.5.916 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Self-citationContextual fear conditioning in humans: cortical–hippocampal and amygdala contributions
Alvarez, R. P., Biggs, A., Chen, G., Pine, D. S., & Grillon, C. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1246-08.2008 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Self-citationCortical afferents to the extended amygdala
McDONALD, A. J., SHAMMAH‐LAGNADO, S. J., SHI, C., & DAVIS, M. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09275.x · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Unpredictable and uncontrollable events: A new perspective on experimental neurosis.
Mineka, S., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.87.2.256 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Waiting for spiders: Brain activation during anticipatory anxiety in spider phobics
Straube, T., Mentzel, H.-J., & Miltner, W. H. R. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.023 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Unpredictable and uncontrollable events: A new perspective on experimental neurosis.
Mineka, S., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.87.2.256 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Uncertainty during anticipation modulates neural responses to aversion in human insula and amygdala
Sarinopoulos, I., Grupe, D. W., Mackiewicz, K. L., Herrington, J. D., Lor, M., Steege, E. E., & Nitschke, J. B. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp155 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Marschner, A., Kalisch, R., Vervliet, B., Vansteenwegen, D., & Büchel, C. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1651-08.2008 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Controllability and predictability in acquired motivation
Mineka, S., & Hendersen, R. W. (1985) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.36.020185.002431 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Cytology and receptor architecture of human anterior cingulate cortex
Palomero‐Gallagher, N., Mohlberg, H., Zilles, K., & Vogt, B. (2008) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.21684 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Walker, D. L., & Davis, M. (2008) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-008-0183-3 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Funayama, E. S., Grillon, C., Davis, M., & Phelps, E. A. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290152541395 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationPredictability modulates the affective and sensory-discriminative neural processing of pain
Carlsson, K., Andersson, J., Petrovic, P., Petersson, K. M., Öhman, A., & Ingvar, M. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.027 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Cerebral blood flow in immediate and sustained anxiety
Hasler, G., Fromm, S., Alvarez, R. P., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Drevets, W. C., & Grillon, C. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5369-06.2007 · Cited by 163 · cited 5× · see citing works
“, 1991), is consistent with previous neuroimaging studies linking unpredictable threat to hypervigilance (Carlsson et al., 2006; Hasler et al., 2007).”
InfluentialSelf-citationBodurka, J., Ye, F., Petridou, N., Murphy, K., & Bandettini, P. A. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.039 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationThree components of the classically conditioned GSR in human subjects.
Prokasy, W. F., & Ebel, H. C. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0024108 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Mackiewicz, K. L., Sarinopoulos, I., Cleven, K. L., & Nitschke, J. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601648103 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Blanchard, R. J. (2008) · Handbook of behavioral neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s1569-7339(07)x0001-8 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Chapter 2.4 Defensive behaviors, fear, and anxiety
Blanchard, D. C., & Blanchard, R. J. (2008) · Handbook of behavioral neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s1569-7339(07)00005-7 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
The human basal forebrain. Part II
Heimer, L., de Olmos, J. S., Alheid, G. F., Pearson, J., Sakamoto, N., Shinoda, K., Marksteiner, J., & Switzer, R. C. (1999) · Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/s0924-8196(99)80024-4 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
The bed nucleus‐amygdala continuum in human and monkey
Price, D. L., Martin, L. J., Powers, R. E., & Dellovade, T. (1991) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903090404 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Andreassi, J. L. (1993) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/0167-8760(93)90012-e · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Regional Response Differences Across the Human Amygdaloid Complex during Social Conditioning
Davis, F. C., Johnstone, T., Mazzulla, E. C., Oler, J. A., & Whalen, P. J. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp126 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Calandreau, L., Desmedt, A., Decorte, L., & Jaffard, R. (2005) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.92305 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Heimer, L., Hoesen, G. W. V., Trimble, M., & Zahm, D. S. (2007) · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Bellgowan, P. S. F., Bandettini, P. A., van Gelderen, P., Martin, A., & Bodurka, J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.042 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationThe amygdala and appraisal processes: stimulus and response complexity as an organizing factor.
Yaniv, D., Desmedt, A., Jaffard, R., & Richter-Levin, G. (2004) · Brain research. Brain research reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2003.08.008 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Scalable multichannel MRI data acquisition system
Bodurka, J., Ledden, P. J., van Gelderen, P., Chu, R., de Zwart, J. A., Morris, D., & Duyn, J. H. (2004) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.10693 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationCavanna, A. E., & Rickards, H. E. (2009) · Cognitive Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1080/13546800903320445 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The human basal forebrain. Part I. An overview
Sakamoto, N., Pearson, J., Shinoda, K., Alheid, G. F., de Olmos, J. S., & Heimer, L. (1999) · Handbook of chemical neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/s0924-8196(99)80023-2 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Pascoe, J. P., & Kapp, B. S. (1987) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(87)90136-9 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
[Nucleus striae terminalis in the brain of adult man. Pigment architectionical study].
STRENGE, H., Braak, E., & Braak, H. (1977) · PubMed · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Worsley (1996) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1996)4:1
Shammah-Lagnado (2000) · doi:10.1002/1096-9861(20000710)422:4
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex
Shackman, A. J., Salomons, T. V., Slagter, H. A., Fox, A. S., Winter, J. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2994 · Cited by 2,082 · see citing works
Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective
Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3524 · Cited by 2,007 · see citing works
Lonsdorf, T. B., Menz, M. M., Andreatta, M., Fullana, M. A., Golkar, A., Haaker, J., Heitland, I., Hermann, A., Kuhn, M., Kruse, O., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Lebow, M. A., & Chen, A. (2016) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.1 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis
Chen, G., Saad, Z. S., Britton, J. C., Pine, D. S., & Cox, R. W. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.047 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Self-citationThe human BNST: functional role in anxiety and addiction
Avery, S. N., Clauss, J. A., & Blackford, J. U. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.185 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Contributions of the central extended amygdala to fear and anxiety
Shackman, A. J., & Fox, A. S. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0982-16.2016 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Luyten, L., Hendrickx, S., Raymaekers, S., Gabriëls, L., & Nuttin, B. (2016) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2015.124 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Extending the amygdala in theories of threat processing
Fox, A. S., Oler, J. A., Tromp, D., Fudge, J. L., & Kalin, N. H. (2015) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2015.03.002 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Chavanne, A. V., & Robinson, O. J. (2020) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19111153 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Dispositional negativity: An integrative psychological and neurobiological perspective.
Shackman, A. J., Tromp, D., Stockbridge, M. D., Kaplan, C. M., Tillman, R. M., & Fox, A. S. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000073 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis, Fear Generalization, and Stress
Besnard, A., & Sahay, A. (2015) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.167 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Servaas, M. N., van der Velde, J., Costafreda, S. G., Horton, P., Ormel, J., Riese, H., & Aleman, A. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.005 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Hantsoo, L., & Epperson, C. N. (2020) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100213 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Somerville, L. H., Wagner, D. D., Wig, G. S., Moran, J. M., Whalen, P. J., & Kelley, W. M. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr373 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Fox, A. S., & Shackman, A. J. (2017) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.11.056 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Rao, V. R., Sellers, K. K., Wallace, D. L., Lee, M. B., Bijanzadeh, M., Sani, O. G., Yang, Y., Shanechi, M. M., Dawes, H. E., & Chang, E. F. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.10.026 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Shankman, S. A., Nelson, B. D., Sarapas, C., Robison-Andrew, E. J., Campbell, M. L., Altman, S. E., McGowan, S. K., Katz, A. C., & Gorka, S. M. (2012) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030747 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Avery, S. N., Clauss, J. A., Winder, D. G., Woodward, N., Heckers, S., & Blackford, J. U. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.017 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
The translational neural circuitry of anxiety
Robinson, O. J., Pike, A. C., Cornwell, B., & Grillon, C. (2019) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2019-321400 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationYassa, M. A., Hazlett, R. L., Stark, C. E. L., & Hoehn-Saric, R. (2012) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.04.013 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Andrewes, D., & Jenkins, L. (2019) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-019-09398-4 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Network Organization Unfolds over Time during Periods of Anxious Anticipation
McMenamin, B. W., Langeslag, S. J. E., Sirbu, M., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1579-14.2014 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Oxytocin׳s role in anxiety: A critical appraisal
MacDonald, K., & Feifel, D. (2014) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.01.025 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in aversive learning and memoryPreprint
Goode, T. D., & Maren, S. (2017) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.044206.116 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Gorka, S. M., Lieberman, L., Shankman, S. A., & Phan, K. L. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/abn0000233 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Sex differences in fear extinction
Velasco, E. R., Florido, A., Milad, M. R., & Andero, R. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.05.020 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Cohodes, E. M., Kitt, E. R., Baskin-sommers, A. R., & Gee, D. G. (2020) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.21969 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Alexander, L., Gaskin, P. L. R., Sawiak, S. J., Fryer, T. D., Hong, Y. T., Cockcroft, G. J., Clarke, H. F., & Roberts, A. C. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.021 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Dissecting the Anticipation of Aversion Reveals Dissociable Neural Networks
Grupe, D. W., Oathes, D. J., & Nitschke, J. B. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs175 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Increased anterior insula activity in anxious individuals is linked to diminished perceived control
Alvarez, R. P., Kirlic, N., Misaki, M., Bodurka, J., Rhudy, J. L., Paulus, M. P., & Drevets, W. C. (2015) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2015.84 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationBed nucleus of the stria terminalis regulates fear to unpredictable threat signals
Goode, T. D., Ressler, R. L., Acca, G. M., Miles, O. W., & Maren, S. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.46525 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Alexander, L., Wood, C. M., Gaskin, P. L. R., Sawiak, S. J., Fryer, T. D., Hong, Y. T., McIver, L., Clarke, H. F., & Roberts, A. C. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19167-0 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Chamberlain, P. D., Rodgers, J., Crowley, M. J., White, S. E., Freeston, M. H., & South, M. (2013) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/2040-2392-4-31 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Resting state connectivity of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis at ultra‐high field
Torrisi, S., O’Connell, K., Davis, A., Reynolds, R. C., Balderston, N. L., Fudge, J. L., Grillon, C., & Monique Ernst, D. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22899 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationAndreescu, C., Sheu, L. K., Tudorascu, D., Gross, J. J., Walker, S. E., Banihashemi, L., & Aizenstein, H. J. (2014) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.05.003 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
How Human Amygdala and Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis May Drive Distinct Defensive Responses
Klumpers, F., Kroes, M. C. W., Baas, J. M. P., & Fernández, G. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3830-16.2017 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Implicit emotion regulation in the presence of threat: Neural and autonomic correlates
Tupak, S. V., Dresler, T., Guhn, A., Ehlis, A., Fallgatter, A. J., Pauli, P., & Herrmann, M. J. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.066 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Revisiting the hippocampal–amygdala pathway in primates: Association with immature-appearing neurons
Fudge, J. L., deCampo, D. M., & Becoats, K. (2012) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.040 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Clauss, J. A., Avery, S. N., & Blackford, J. U. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.03.001 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Khalsa, S. S., Feinstein, J. S., Li, W., Feusner, J. D., Adolphs, R., & Hurlemann, R. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4109-15.2016 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Interplay of Amygdala and Cingulate Plasticity in Emotional Fear
Toyoda, H., Li, X., Wu, L., Zhao, M., Descalzi, G., Chen, T., Koga, K., & Zhuo, M. (2011) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2011/813749 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Intrinsic functional connectivity of the central extended amygdala
Tillman, R. M., Stockbridge, M. D., Nacewicz, B. M., Torrisi, S., Fox, A. S., Smith, J. F., & Shackman, A. J. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23917 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Gender differences in anxiety: The mediating role of sensitivity to unpredictable threat
Burani, K., & Nelson, B. D. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.001 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Prefrontal modulation of anxiety through a lens of noradrenergic signaling
Bouras, N. N., Mack, N. R., & Gao, W. (2023) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2023.1173326 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Taugher, R. J., Lü, Y., Wang, Y., Kreple, C. J., Ghobbeh, A., Fan, R., Sowers, L. P., & Wemmie, J. A. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1680-14.2014 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Herrmann, M. J., Boehme, S., Becker, M. P. I., Tupak, S. V., Guhn, A., Schmidt, B., Brinkmann, L., & Straube, T. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23088 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Xiao, Q., Zhou, X., Wei, P., Xie, L., Han, Y., Wu, B., Wang, J., Cai, A., Xu, F., Lu, Y., et al. (2020) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-020-0816-3 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Are Fear and Anxiety Truly Distinct?
Daniel‐Watanabe, L., & Fletcher, P. C. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.09.006 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Oler, J. A., Tromp, D., Fox, A. S., Kovner, R., Davidson, R. J., Alexander, A. L., McFarlin, D. R., Birn, R. M., Berg, B. E., deCampo, D. M., et al. (2016) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1198-9 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Cross-species anxiety tests in psychiatry: pitfalls and promises
Bach, D. R. (2021) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01299-4 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Morriss, J., Gell, M., & van Reekum, C. M. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.013 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Social anxiety is associated with BNST response to unpredictability
Clauss, J. A., Avery, S. N., Benningfield, M. M., & Blackford, J. U. (2019) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.22891 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Initial and sustained brain responses to contextual conditioned anxiety in humans
Andreatta, M., Glotzbach-Schoon, E., Mühlberger, A., Schulz, S. M., Wiemer, J., & Pauli, P. (2015) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.014 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Serotonin inputs to the dorsal BNST modulate anxiety in a 5-HT1A receptor-dependent manner
Garcia‐García, Á. L., Canetta, S., Stujenske, J. M., Burghardt, N. S., Ansorge, M. S., Dranovsky, A., & Leonardo, E. D. (2017) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2017.165 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Stress Impairs Episodic Retrieval by Disrupting Hippocampal and Cortical Mechanisms of Remembering
Gagnon, S. A., Waskom, M. L., Brown, T. I., & Wagner, A. D. (2019) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy162 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Brinkmann, L., Buff, C., Feldker, K., Tupak, S. V., Becker, M. P. I., Herrmann, M. J., & Straube, T. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717001192 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Oler, J. A., Birn, R. M., Patriat, R., Fox, A. S., Shelton, S. E., Burghy, C. A., Stodola, D. E., Essex, M. J., Davidson, R. J., & Kalin, N. H. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.045 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Lange, M. D., Daldrup, T., Remmers, F., Szkudlarek, H. J., Lesting, J., Guggenhuber, S., Ruehle, S., Jüngling, K., Seidenbecher, T., Lutz, B., et al. (2016) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.156 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Buff, C., Brinkmann, L., Bruchmann, M., Becker, M. P. I., Tupak, S. V., Herrmann, M. J., & Straube, T. (2017) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsx103 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Modeling anxiety in healthy humans: a key intermediate bridge between basic and clinical sciences
Grillon, C., Robinson, O. J., Cornwell, B., & Ernst, M. (2019) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0445-1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationManual segmentation of the human bed nucleus of the stria terminalis using 3 T MRI
Theiss, J. D., Ridgewell, C., McHugo, M., Heckers, S., & Blackford, J. U. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.047 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Brinkmann, L., Buff, C., Neumeister, P., Tupak, S. V., Becker, M. P. I., Herrmann, M. J., & Straube, T. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23513 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Pervasive competition between threat and reward in the brain
Choi, J. M., Padmala, S., Spechler, P. A., & Pessoa, L. (2013) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nst053 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Dynamic Networks in the Emotional Brain
Pessoa, L., & McMenamin, B. W. (2016) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858416671936 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Stolz, C., Endres, D., & Mueller, E. M. (2018) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13308 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Rabellino, D., Densmore, M., Harricharan, S., Théberge, J., McKinnon, M. C., & Lanius, R. A. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23925 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Expression of freezing and fear‐potentiated startle during sustained fear in mice
Daldrup, T., Remmes, J., Lesting, J., Gaburro, S., Fendt, M., Meuth, P., Kloke, V., Pape, H., & Seidenbecher, T. (2015) · Genes Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12211 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Enhanced discrimination between threatening and safe contexts in high-anxious individuals
Glotzbach-Schoon, E., Tadda, R., Andreatta, M., Tröger, C., Ewald, H., Grillon, C., Pauli, P., & Mühlberger, A. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.01.011 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationAlcohol stress response dampening during imminent versus distal, uncertain threat.
Hefner, K. R., Moberg, C. A., Hachiya, L. Y., & Curtin, J. J. (2013) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033407 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
The Impact of Emotional States on Cognitive Control Circuitry and Function
Cohen, A. O., Dellarco, D. V., Breiner, K., Helion, C., Heller, A. S., Rahdar, A., Pedersen, G., Chein, J., Dyke, J. P., Galvan, A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00906 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Glotzbach-Schoon, E., Andreatta, M., Reif, A., Ewald, H., Tröger, C., Baumann, C., Deckert, J., Mühlberger, A., & Pauli, P. (2013) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00031 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Threat visibility modulates the defensive brain circuit underlying fear and anxiety
Rigoli, F., Ewbank, M., Dalgleish, T., & Calder, A. J. (2015) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.11.026 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Startle response to unpredictable threat in comorbid panic disorder and alcohol dependence
Gorka, S. M., Nelson, B. D., & Shankman, S. A. (2013) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.003 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Decision ambiguity is mediated by a late positive potential originating from cingulate cortex
Sun, S., Zhen, S., Fu, Z., Wu, D.-A. J., Shinsuke Shimojo, A., Adolphs, R., Yu, R., & Wang, S. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.003 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Brinkmann, L., Buff, C., Feldker, K., Neumeister, P., Heitmann, C. Y., Hofmann, D., Bruchmann, M., Herrmann, M. J., & Straube, T. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.054 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Neural Mechanisms of Placebo Anxiolysis
Meyer, B., Yuen, K. S. L., Ertl, M., Polomac, N., Mulert, C., Büchel, C., & Kalisch, R. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4793-14.2015 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
deCampo, D. M., & Fudge, J. L. (2013) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23340 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Motzkin, J. C., Philippi, C. L., Oler, J. A., Kalin, N. H., Başkaya, M. K., & Koenigs, M. R. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.11.013 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Interpreting ambiguous social cues in unpredictable contexts
Davis, F. C., Neta, M., Kim, M. J., Moran, J. M., & Whalen, P. J. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw003 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Kastner, A. K., Andreatta, M., Pauli, P., & Wieser, M. J. (2018) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.008 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Gorka, S. M., Lieberman, L., Phan, K. L., & Shankman, S. A. (2016) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.034 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat
Kim, A. J., & Anderson, B. A. (2020) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0099-20.2020 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Naaz, F., Knight, L. K., & Depue, B. E. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01369 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Fornari, R. V., Wichmann, R., Atucha, E., Desprez, T., Eggens‐Meijer, E., & Roozendaal, B. (2012) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00010 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Haaker, J., Lonsdorf, T. B., & Kalisch, R. (2015) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.07.016 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
The time-course of cortico-limbic neural responses to air hunger
Binks, A. P., Evans, K. C., Reed, J. D., Moosavi, S. H., & Banzett, R. B. (2014) · Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.resp.2014.09.005 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Extended amygdala connectivity changes during sustained shock anticipation
Torrisi, S., Gorka, A. X., González-Castillo, J., O’Connell, K., Balderston, N. L., Grillon, C., & Monique Ernst, D. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-017-0074-6 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationDistinct Processing of Aversive Experience in Amygdala Subregions
Michely, J., Rigoli, F., Rutledge, R. B., Hauser, T. U., & Dolan, R. J. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.07.008 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Grillon, C., O’Connell, K., Lieberman, L., Alvarez, G., Geraci, M. F., Pine, D. S., & Monique Ernst, D. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.08.005 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationLandowska, A., Roberts, D., Eachus, P., & Barrett, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00362 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Schadl, K., Vassar, R. L., Cahill‐Rowley, K., Yeom, K. W., Stevenson, D. K., & Rose, J. (2017) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.023 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
van de Poll, Y., Cras, Y., & Ellender, T. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2023.1225758 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
A neural signature for the subjective experience of threat anticipation under uncertainty
Liu, X., Jiao, G., Zhou, F., Kendrick, K. M., Yao, D., Gong, Q., Xiang, S., Jia, T., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45433-6 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Wieser, M. J., Reicherts, P., Juravle, G., & von Leupoldt, A. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.026 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Gorka, S. M., Kreutzer, K. A., Petrey, K., Radoman, M., & Phan, K. L. (2019) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/adb.12774 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Anxiogenic effects of CGRP within the BNST may be mediated by CRF acting at BNST CRFR1 receptors
Sink, K. S., Chung, A., Ressler, K. J., Davis, M., & Walker, D. L. (2013) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.01.024 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Relationships among attention networks and physiological responding to threat
Sarapas, C., Weinberg, A., Langenecker, S. A., & Shankman, S. A. (2016) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.09.012 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Luyten, L., Casteels, C., Vansteenwegen, D., van Kuyck, K., Koole, M., Van Laere, K., & Nuttin, B. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3701-11.2012 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Knight, L. K., & Depue, B. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00510 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alvarez, R. P., Chen, G., Bodurka, J., Kaplan, R., & Grillon, C.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alvarez, Ruben P.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 389-400
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3100535
- OpenAlex
- W2027289999
- Semantic Scholar
- 99e0c06ed1cdabb20db71e1b5b5f5ffe3ba61183
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002798)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, anterior insula, hypervigilance, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, basal forebrain, skin conductance
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Fear, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review