CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,475Creativity in Education and NeurosciencePsychological and Educational Research StudiesDesign Education and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 178 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Creativity

Hennessey, Beth A., Amabile, Teresa M.·2010·Annual Review of Psychology
DOI 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The psychological study of creativity is essential to human progress. If strides are to be made in the sciences, humanities, and arts, we must arrive at a far more detailed understanding of the creative process, its antecedents, and its inhibitors. This review, encompassing most subspecialties in the study of creativity and focusing on twenty-first-century literature, reveals both a growing interest in creativity among psychologists and a growing fragmentation in the field. To be sure, research into the psychology of creativity has grown theoretically and methodologically sophisticated, and researchers have made important contributions from an ever-expanding variety of disciplines. But this expansion has not come without a price. Investigators in one subfield often seem unaware of advances in another. Deeper understanding requires more interdisciplinary research, based on a systems view of creativity that recognizes a variety of interrelated forces operating at multiple levels.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416

Cites

178 of 178 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 178 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Amabile TM, 1996, Creativity in Context
  2. Amabile TM, 2002, Harvard Bus. Rev., 80, 52
  3. 10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/1170677 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cramond B, 1999, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 9, 77
  6. Deci EL, 2002, Handbook of Self-Determination Research
  7. DeCoker G, 2000, Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 780
  8. 10.2307/259083 · DOI
  9. Eberle B, 1997, Scamper: Creative Games and Activities for Imagination Development
  10. Edmondson AC, 2006, Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams, 109
  11. 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_02 · DOI
  12. Feist GJ, 1999, Psychol. Inq., 10, 334
  13. 10.2307/259166 · DOI
  14. Gardner H, 1999, Psychol. Inq., 10, 338
  15. 10.1080/078559814 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.687 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_09 · DOI
  18. Hennessey BA, 2004, Developing Creativity in Gifted Children: The Central Importance of Motivation and Classroom Climate
  19. Hongli W, 2004, Psychol. Sci, 27, 383
  20. Huang S, 2005, Psychol. Sci. (China), 28, 1243
  21. Isen AM, 2000, Handbook of Emotions, 417
  22. Jiliang S, 2007, Psychol. Sci, 30, 285
  23. Kaufman JC, 2002, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 12, 5
  24. 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_03 · DOI
  25. Kim J, 2006, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 16, 25
  26. Lee K-H, 2002, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 12, 59
  27. Lee S, 2005, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 15, 143
  28. 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_14 · DOI
  29. Majid DA, 2003, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 13, 67
  30. 10.1037//0022-3514.64.3.317 · DOI
  31. Necka E, 1999, Polish Psychol. Bull., 30, 85
  32. 10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_12 · DOI
  33. Ng AK, 2005, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 15, 65
  34. Parnes SJ, 1966, Manual for Institutes and Programs
  35. Perrine NE, 2005, Creat. Res. J., 39, 217
  36. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sullivan DM, 2005, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 15, 117
  38. Svensson N, 2002, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 12, 15
  39. Tan A-G, 2000, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 10, 49
  40. Tan A-G, 2000, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 10, 79
  41. Tan A-G, 2002, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 12, 59
  42. Tan A-G, 2006, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 16, 17
  43. Torrance EP, 1966, Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms—Technical Manual
  44. Treffinger DJ, 1992, Creative Problem Solving: An Introduction
  45. Treffinger DJ, 2006, Creative Problem Solving: An Introduction
  46. Treffinger DJ, 2004, Korean J. Probl. Solv., 14, 5
  47. West MA, 2005, Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams, 137
  48. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.159 · DOI
  49. Zhengkui L, 2007, Psychol. Sci. (China), 30, 387

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,475

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Wellesley College (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Amabile, Teresa M.
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
569-598
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
DOI
10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416
OpenAlex
W4213310839
Cited by
1,475
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 119 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 127 · 2017: 86 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 42
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
creativity, psychology of creativity, creative process, antecedents of creativity, interdisciplinary research
MeSH terms
Affect, Cognition, Concept Formation, Creativity, Humans, Individuality, Interpersonal Relations, Social Environment, Temperament

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review