The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sex Differences in Earnings in The United States
Abstract
This paper reviews the current state of knowledge on sex differences in earnings in the United States. The paper has three sections. The first describes the phenomenon under consideration, reviewing what is known about the size of the wage gap, historical and life course variations in the wage gap, and race differences in the wage gap. The second section, which constitutes most of the paper, reviews explanatory theories advanced to account for the wage gap and the empirical evidence relevant to their evaluation. This section is divided into two principle parts. The first considers “supply-side” explanations that focus on the characteristics and decisions of individual workers. These include the human capital theory of economics and alternative views offered by sociologists and social psychologists that focus on processes of socialization and allocation and the operation of social networks. All of these explanations attribute the sex gap in earnings to differences in the qualifications, intentions, and attitudes that women and men bring to the labor market, including the social ties that influence worker-job matches. The second part of the section considers “demand side” explanations that focus on characteristics of the workplace and actors within it. These explanations include theories of discrimination in the labor market developed primarily by economists and social psychologists and ideas about the evolution and persistence of a discriminatory wage structure put forward by institutional economists and sociologists. The final section suggests directions for future work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Stress Process and the Social Distribution of Depression
Turner, R. J., & Lloyd, D. A. (1999) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2676332 · Cited by 592
Widowhood and Depression: Explaining Long-Term Gender Differences in Vulnerability
Umberson, D., Wortman, C. B., & Kessler, R. C. (1992) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136854 · Cited by 555
Gaining the upper hand: Economic mobility among immigrant and domestic minorities
Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1992) · Ethnic and Racial Studies · doi:10.1080/01419870.1992.9993761 · Cited by 419
Determinants of Managerial Career Success: Evidence and Explanation of Male/Female Differences
Kirchmeyer, C. (1998) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80079-8 · Cited by 375
Pay Differences among the Highly Paid: The Male-Female Earnings Gap in Lawyers' Salaries
Wood, R. G., Corcoran, M. E., & Courant, P. N. (1993) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/298302 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Marini, M. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 343-380
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2106212744
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex Differences in Earnings in The United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.002015
- The paper
- Marini, M. M. (1989). Sex Differences in Earnings in The United States. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.002015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.