The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives
Abstract
This paper defines the concepts of gender and social reproduction as developed in feminist theory and discusses their utility for synthesizing recent historical research on women. We review literature on the emergence, institutionalization, and reorganization of “separate spheres” in nineteenth and early twentieth century Europe and North America. Focusing on social class differences in family strategies, procreation, sexuality, consumerism, professionalization, and state policy, we argue that the organization of gender relations and social reproduction crucially shaped macrohistorical processes, as well as being shaped by them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender: a useful category of historical analysis
Scott, J. W. (1986) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1864376 · Cited by 4,184
Gender and the Politics of History
Scott, J. W. (1988) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/scot91266 · Cited by 3,011
Family: Socialization and Interaction Process
Bales, R. F., & Parsons, T. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315824307 · Cited by 2,284
Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis
Scott, J. W. (1986) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.1086/ahr/91.5.1053 · Cited by 2,191
When and where I enter : the impact of Black women on race and sex in America
Giddings, P. J. (1985) · Cited by 1,464
Intimate matters: a history of sexuality in America
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-1209 · Cited by 940
Labor of Love, Labor of Sorrow: Black Women, Work, and the Family from Slavery to the Present
Lerner, G., & Jones, J. (1986) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1869291 · Cited by 912
Cheap Amusements: Working Women and Leisure in Turn-of-the-Century New York
Smith, R. P., & Peiss, K. (1987) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1862951 · Cited by 857
Tilly, L. A., & Scott, J. W. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203819395 · Cited by 602
City of Women: Sex and Class in New York, 1789-1860
Hirsch, S. E., & Stansell, C. (1988) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1860069 · Cited by 467
Cited by
Glenn, E. N. (1992) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/494777 · Cited by 1,465
Transnational Childhoods: The Participation of Children in Processes of Family Migration
Orellana, M. F., Thorne, B., Chee, A., & Lam, W. S. E. (2001) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2001.48.4.572 · Cited by 623
Doing the Dirty Work: Gender, Race, and Reproductive Labor in Historical Perspective
Duffy, M. (2007) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243207300764 · Cited by 377
Duffy, M. (2005) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243204269499 · Cited by 274
After Innovation, Turn to Maintenance
Russell, A. L., & Vinsel, L. (2018) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.1353/tech.2018.0004 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Laslett, B., & Brenner, J.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1989-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 381-404
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2165196212
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 31.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.002121
- The paper
- Laslett, B., & Brenner, J. (1989). Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.002121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.