The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fundamentalism et al: Conservative Protestants in America
Abstract
Since the rise of the religious right, scholars have become increasingly interested in studying conservative Protestantism. Not only do conservative Protestants (CPs) make up at least a quarter of the US population; they differ from many Americans in gender-role attitudes, childrearing styles, political orientation, and other ways as well. In fact, religious factors often predict people's political views better than do either class or gender, even though the latter two have received far more attention in the scholarly literature ( Manza & Brooks 1997 , Kellstedt et al 1996b ). Unfortunately research in this area has been hampered by imprecise measurement and poor understanding of the various movements grouped together as CPs. This has muddied statistical results, stifled theoretical development, and blinded researchers to promising areas of analysis. Thus, in this chapter we first discuss the history and distinctive qualities of the various CP movements, then we use these insights to propose better survey measures, and finally we apply this knowledge to several substantive areas (i.e., gender-role attitudes, childrearing styles, tolerance, the “culture wars,” the religious right, and the reasons for the religious vitality of CP groups).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230995 · Cited by 1,250
Religious Influence on Marital Stability
Call, V. R. A., & Heaton, T. B. (1997) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1387856 · Cited by 457
Cited by
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015141 · Cited by 4,560
Mason, L. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12089 · Cited by 1,458
The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆
Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001 · Cited by 1,018
Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society
Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100203 · Cited by 914
Transformations in New Immigrant Religions and Their Global Implications
Yang, F., & Ebaugh, H. R. (2001) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240106600206 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodberry, R. D., & Smith, C. S.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-56
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2149502013
- Cited by
- 510
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fundamentalism et al: Conservative Protestants in America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.25
- The paper
- Woodberry, R. D., & Smith, C. S. (1998). Fundamentalism et al: Conservative Protestants in America. Annual Review of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.