Cited by 1,018Quality and Supply ManagementCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management

The dark side of buyer–supplier relationships: A social capital perspective⋆

Villena, Verónica H., Revilla, Elena, Choi, Thomas Y.·2011·Journal of Operations Management

Abstract

The literature on supply chain management (SCM) has consistently promoted the “bright side” of collaborative buyer–supplier relationships (BSRs). Based on the social capital argument, SCM scholars have investigated how a buyer can gain access to and leverage resources through its collaborative BSRs. Our study extends this research stream by considering the “dark side” of social capital in BSRs. It evaluates how social capital in its cognitive, relational, and structural forms contributes to or impedes value creation within BSRs. Both primary survey measures and secondary objective measures have been used in data analysis. The results show the presence of both the bright side, confirming the existing literature, and the dark side, extending the literature. There is an inverted curvilinear relationship between social capital and performance: Either too little or too much social capital can hurt performance. This study confirms that building social capital in a collaborative BSR positively affects buyer performance, but that if taken to an extreme it can reduce the buyer's ability to be objective and make effective decisions as well as increase the supplier's opportunistic behavior. Our study also examines how a buyer can delay the emergence of the dark side. It opens up new research avenues in the collaborative BSR context and suggests directions for future research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001

Cites

148 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relational social capital that engenders norms of obligation, commitment, and reciprocity can promote adherence to extant belief systems.

    “relational SC that engenders norms of obligation, commitment, and reciprocity (Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998;Villena et al. 2011) can also promote adherence to extant belief systems.”

    From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Villena et al. 2011

  • Two of the six negative effects, dilution of dialectical process and groupthink, have attracted some attention in the social capital literature to date.

    “Two of these effects, dilution of dialectical process and groupthink, have attracted some attention in the SC literature to date (de Clercq et al. 2009;Villena et al. 2011).”

    From The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017) · cites this paper as Villena et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 156 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Burt R.S., 2010, Neighbor Networks
  2. 10.2307/259291 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/259056 · DOI
  4. Dyer J.H., 2003, Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: The Toyota case, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345, 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<345::aid-smj96>3.0.co;2-n · DOI
  5. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<203::aid-smj102>3.0.co;2-k · DOI
  6. Hofstede G., 2001, Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations
  7. Janis I.L., 1982, Groupthinking: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos
  8. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::aid-smj95>3.0.co;2-y · DOI
  9. Lambert D.M, 1990, Measuring nonresponse bias in customer service mail surveys, Journal of Business Logistics, 11, 5
  10. 10.1142/9789812798060 · DOI
  11. Nunnally J., 1978, Psychometric Theory
  12. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<369::aid-smj93>3.0.co;2-m · DOI
  13. Thompson J.D., 1967, Organizations in Action

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villena, V. H., Revilla, E., & Choi, T. Y.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Operations Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
561-576
ISSN
  • 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-1317
OpenAlex
W2056464740
Cited by
1,018
References
156
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 74 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 12
FWCI
32.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Operations Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Keywords
buyer-supplier relationships, social capital, supply chain collaboration, value creation, buyer performance, opportunism, supplier-buyer relationships, cognitive social capital, relational social capital, structural social capital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review