Cited by 1,027Contemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeSocial Power and Status DynamicsManagement and Organizational Studies

Legitimacy as a Social Process

Johnson, Cathryn, Dowd, Timothy J., Ridgeway, Cecilia L.·2006·Annual Review of Sociology

Abstract

To gain an in-depth understanding of legitimacy as a general social process, we review contemporary approaches to legitimacy within two areas of sociology: social psychology and organizations. A comparison of these distinct approaches allows us to explain the process, both in implicit and explicit ways at different levels of analysis, through which a social object is construed as legitimate. This comparison also suggests four stages in the process by which new social objects, both individual (worthy/unworthy individuals) and collective (organizational forms), gain legitimation: innovation, local validation, diffusion, and general validation. We then show how legitimation of the status quo—that is, the acceptance of widespread consensual schemas/beliefs in the larger society—often fosters the stability of nonoptimal actions and practices that are created as a result of these new individual and collective social objects. Finally, we discuss how consensual beliefs such as status beliefs and cultural capital fuel the reproduction of inefficiency and inequality in groups and organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123101

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Innovations diffuse based not so much on evidence as on 'theorization'.

    “We have arrived at this situation because, as institutionalists have been arguing, innovations diffuse based not so much on evidence as on 'theorization' (Davis and Greve, 1997;Johnson et al., 2006;Strang, 2010;Strang and Meyer. 1993).”

    From Are Diversity Programs Merely Ceremonial? Evidence-Free Institutionalization (2017) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, C., Dowd, T. J., & Ridgeway, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Sociology
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
53-78
ISSN
  • 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2115
OpenAlex
W2144548174
Cited by
1,027
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 85 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 37
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annual Review of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
legitimacy, legitimation, social construction of legitimacy, organizational legitimacy, local validation, diffusion, status beliefs, cultural capital, inequality, social stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review