The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Horizontal Stratification in Postsecondary Education: Forms, Explanations, and Implications
Abstract
For the past 20 years, social scientists have devoted increasing attention to the links between type of postsecondary education received and socioeconomic inequalities. Borrowing the terminology of Charles & Bradley (2002) , we refer to the forms of these connections as horizontal dimensions of education-based stratification. We review studies of how institutional characteristics (college quality and type) and college experiences (field of specialization, academic performance, and pathway) are related to labor market outcomes. We also discuss research that treats college quality and field of specialization as dependent variables influenced by gender, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Throughout, we assess alternative theoretical explanations for why and how these horizontal aspects of college education play a stratifying role. We also note methodological developments that raise questions about some of the effects. Mirroring the literature, we emphasize how horizontal dimensions of stratification at the postsecondary level relate to gender differences on both the labor market and education sides. We propose additional theoretical and empirical issues that research on horizontal stratification in postsecondary education should address.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self‐Assessments
Correll, S. J. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/321299 · Cited by 1,320
Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302320935089 · Cited by 995
Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement, and College Culture
Holland, D. C., Eisenhart, M. A., & Connell, R. W. (1990) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226218496.001.0001 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Torche, F. (2011) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/661904 · Cited by 587
Growing Wealth Gaps in Education
Pfeffer, F. T. (2018) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-018-0666-7 · Cited by 178
Field of Study in College and Lifetime Earnings in the United States
Kim, C., Tamborini, C. R., & Sakamoto, A. (2015) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/0038040715602132 · Cited by 162
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 72
“These and other forms of horizontal stratification have long been highlighted in the sociological literature (Gerber and Cheung, 2008; Torche, 2011) and have increasingly also been the subject of economic research.”
BackgroundMultiple dimensions of social background and horizontal educational attainment in Sweden
Hällsten, M., & Thaning, M. (2018) · Research in Social Stratification and Mobility · doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2018.06.005 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerber, T. P., & Cheung, S. Y.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Sociology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 299-318
- ISSN
- 0360-0572 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2115
- OpenAlex
- W2118277131
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.