Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Image Separation Radioisotope Scanning

Kuhl, David E., Edwards, Roy Q.·1963·Radiology

Abstract

Discrimination of an image from its background in radioisotope scanning depends on many factors. Photoscanning (1, 2) is a useful means of increasing contrast. Discrimination also depends on how well the image contours may be separated from others in the background, and improvement should be possible, in some instances, by separation of images of radioactivity according to their depths in the body. We have sought to accomplish this by exploring the application of principles of stereoradiography and body-section radiography to radioisotope scanning. Rectilinear Scanning The rectilinear scanning pattern is most commonly employed; that is, an area of the body is scanned in a sequence of straight parallel strips (Fig. 1). With rectilinear scanning, images from all levels in the body are superimposed on the recording. As a consequence of this overlapping, the contours of a tumor image may be lost in a confusion of patterns resulting from overlying or underlying radioactivity. The characteristics of ordinary rectilinear scanning were demonstrated with a laboratory scanner to furnish a base line against which the results of other scanning modes could be compared. The instrument was assembled from the mechanical drive of a milling machine and equipped with an oscilloscope photorecording device. A shielded scintillation detector with a NaI(Tl) crystal 3 inches in diameter and 2 inches in thickness was used. The 31-hole focused collimator had a 3-inch focal length and provided approximately 1/4-inch radius of view at the focus. Pulse-height analysis was employed in counting to exclude all but the 364-kv photopeak pulses from I131. Scanning speed was 0.40 cm. per second and the line spacing was 0.5 cm. A Masonite phantom was constructed, approximately the size of a human head (Fig. 2). Twelve radioactive cylinders were distributed in three different planes within the phantom. Each cylinder measured 2 cm. in width and height, and each contained 5 microcuries of I131. For rectilinear scanning, the mechanical drive moved the detector back and forth across the entire top area of the phantom. At the same time, the spot of a cathode ray oscilloscope was moved back and forth in a rectilinear raster, synchronized with the position of the scanning detector by a potentiometer circuit geared to the traversing mechanism. The oscilloscope beam brightness was electronically modulated by the count rate. An oscilloscope camera with open shutter recorded the scanning pattern on film by photographic integration from the screen. The rectilinear scanning pattern which resulted is shown in Figure 3. In this recording, the sources on all planes are superimposed without depth discrimination. Some images are hidden by those above and the pattern of radioactivity on any particular plane cannot be distinguished from that on any other plane.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/80.4.653

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kuhl, D. E., & Edwards, R. Q.
Venue
Radiology
Published
1963-04
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
653-662
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2016825883
Cited by
423
References
0
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.