CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 257Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchMRI in cancer diagnosisRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Small (≤20 mm) Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: Analysis of Enhancement Patterns and Secondary Signs with Multiphasic Multidetector CT

Yoon, Soon Ho, Lee, Jeong Min, Cho, Jae Yoon, Lee, Kyung Bun, Kim, Ji Eun, Moon, Seung Kyoung, Kim, Soo Jin, Baek, Jee Hyun, Kim, Seung Ho, Kim, Se Hyung, Lee, Jae Young, Han, Joon Koo, Choi, Byung Ihn·2011·Radiology
DOI 10.1148/radiol.11101133
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the enhancement patterns, prevalence of secondary signs, and histopathologic features of 20-mm-diameter or smaller pancreatic cancers seen on multiphasic multidetector computed tomographic (CT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; the requirement for informed consent was waived. From January 2002 through September 2009, the authors reviewed the clinical and imaging data of 130 consecutive patients (76 men, 54 women; mean age, 64.1 years; age range, 28-82 years) who had surgically proven 30-mm-diameter or smaller pancreatic cancers and underwent preoperative multidetector CT and 33 consecutive patients (17 men, 16 women; mean age, 65.1 years; age range, 48-84 years) who had histopathologically proven pancreatic cancer and underwent incidental multidetector CT before the diagnosis was rendered. Only pancreatic phase CT was performed in two patients, and only hepatic venous phase CT was performed in nine patients. Two radiologists in consensus classified the tumor attenuation as hyper-, iso-, or hypoattenuation during the pancreatic and hepatic venous phases. Accompanying secondary signs, temporal changes in tumor attenuation, and histopathologic findings also were analyzed. The Fisher exact test, χ(2) test, generalized estimating equation, and Student t test were used to compare the variables. RESULTS: Seventy tumors were 20 mm or smaller, and 93 were 21-30 mm. Isoattenuating pancreatic cancers were more commonly observed among the 20-mm or smaller tumors (16 of 59, 27%) than among the 21-30-mm tumors (12 of 93, 13%) (P = .033). They were also more common among well-differentiated tumors (seven of 12, 58%) than among moderately differentiated (20 of 124, 16%) and poorly differentiated (one of 10, 10%) tumors (P = .001). The prevalence of secondary signs differed significantly according to tumor size (53 [76%] of 70 ≤20-mm tumors vs 92 [99%] of 93 21-30-mm tumors) (P < .001). The prevalence of secondary signs was high among isoattenuating pancreatic cancers (14 [88%] of 16 ≤20-mm tumors vs all 12 [100%] 21-30-mm tumors). Most of the isoattenuating tumors seen at prediagnostic CT were hypoattenuating after 6 months (100% [four of four] during pancreatic phase, 71% [five of seven] during hepatic venous phase). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of isoattenuating pancreatic cancers differed significantly according to tumor size and cellular differentiation. Most small isoattenuating pancreatic cancers showed secondary signs. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101133/-/DC1.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.11101133

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Itoh S, 2002, Radiat Med, 20, 59
  2. Aoki K, 1994, Jpn J Clin Oncol, 24, 85

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 257

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Yoon, S. H., Lee, J. M., Cho, J. Y., Lee, K. B., Kim, J. E., Moon, S. K., Kim, S. J., Baek, J. H., Kim, S. H., Kim, S. H., Lee, J. Y., Han, J. K., & Choi, B. I.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Radiology
Publisher
Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
Published
2011-05
Volume
259
Issue
2
Pages
442-452
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
DOI
10.1148/radiol.11101133
OpenAlex
W2125198438
Cited by
257
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, small pancreatic tumors, tumor enhancement pattern, tumor differentiation, tumor size, tumor attenuation, incidental CT finding, histopathological correlation, preoperative imaging features, tumor vascularity, tumor necrosis
MeSH terms
Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Contrast Media, Female, Humans, Iohexol, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review