The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gliomas: Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging in Grading
Abstract
Purpose To assess the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging parameters in grading gliomas. Materials and methods The institutional review board approved this prospective study, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Diffusion parameters-mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean kurtosis, and radial and axial kurtosis-were compared in the solid parts of 17 high-grade gliomas and 11 low-grade gliomas (P Results Mean, radial, and axial kurtosis were significantly higher in high-grade gliomas than in low-grade gliomas (P = .02, P = .015, and P = .01, respectively). FA and MD did not significantly differ between glioma grades. All values, except for axial kurtosis, that were normalized to the values in the contralateral NAWM were significantly different between high-grade and low-grade gliomas (mean kurtosis, P = .02; radial kurtosis, P = .03; FA, P = .025; and MD, P = .03). When values were normalized to those in the contralateral PLIC, none of the considered parameters showed significant differences between high-grade and low-grade gliomas. The highest sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between high-grade and low-grade gliomas were found for mean kurtosis (71% and 82%, respectively) and mean kurtosis normalized to the value in the contralateral NAWM (100% and 73%, respectively). Optimal thresholds for mean kurtosis and mean kurtosis normalized to the value in the contralateral NAWM for differentiating high-gr…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“DKI's mean kurtosis is known to correlate well with tumor grade (Raab et al., 2010;Van Cauter et al., 2012)”
From NODDI in clinical research (2020) · cites this paper as Van Cauter et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System
Louis, D. N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O. D., Cavenee, W. K., Burger, P. C., Jouvet, A., Scheithauer, B. W., & Kleihues, P. (2007) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 · Cited by 15,656
Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications
Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J., Poupon, C., Clark, C. A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., & Chabriat, H. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1076 · Cited by 3,547
Jensen, J. H., Helpern, J. A., Ramani, A., Lu, H., & Kaczynski, K. (2005) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20508 · Cited by 2,488
The B‐matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data
Leemans, A., & Jones, D. K. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.21890 · Cited by 1,266
Twenty‐five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data
Jones, D. K., & Cercignani, M. (2010) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1543 · Cited by 827
White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging
Fieremans, E., Jensen, J. H., & Helpern, J. A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.006 · Cited by 561
Diffusion MR imaging: clinical applications.
Bihan, D. L., Turner, R., Douek, P., & Patronas, N. J. (1992) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.159.3.1503032 · Cited by 486
Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology.
Cha, S. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 448
Cerebral gliomas: diffusional kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences
Raab, P., Hattingen, E., Franz, K., Zanella, F. E., & Lanfermann, H. (2010) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.09090819 · Cited by 362
How often are nonenhancing supratentorial gliomas malignant? A population study
Scott, J. N., Brasher, P. M. A., Sevick, R. J., Rewcastle, N. B., & Forsyth, P. A. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.59.6.947 · Cited by 362
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Stadnik TW, 2001, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 22, 969
- Castillo M, 2001, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 22, 60
- Cha S, 2006, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 27, 475
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–339 of 339
Measuring Microstructural Features Using Diffusion MRI
Shemesh, N. (2020) · Advances in magnetic resonance technology and applications · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817057-1.00024-x · Cited by 1
Reliability and Uncertainty in Diffusion MRI Modelling
Charles, C. N. (2016) · The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) · Cited by 1
Gong, T., Tong, Q., He, H., Li, Z., & Zhong, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.13075 · Cited by 1
Intra-individual reaction time variability in sustained attention
Moss, R. A. (2018) · Cited by 1
Anistropic sampling shape of white matter microstructure cannot cheat the diffusional kurtosis
Chen, Y., Zhao, X. W., Sha, M., Wang, W., Liu, Y., Meng, J., Ma, J., Ni, H., Qi, H., & Ming, D. (2015) · International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST) · doi:10.1109/icawst.2015.7314033
Bedoya, L. M. A., & Sánchez, S. V. Á. (2013) · Ciencia y Tecnología para la Salud Visual y Ocular · doi:10.19052/sv.2322
History and evolution of Brain t umor imaging: Insights through
Castillo, M. (2014)
Progress in Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Image
Taoka, T. (2016) · Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.7887/jcns.25.402
Comparison of Analytical Values in Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging among Different MRI Units
Tan, S., Ujita, K., Fukushima, Y., & Suto, T. (2017) · Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology · doi:10.6009/jjrt.2017_jsrt_73.1.20
Anisotropic Sampling Shape of White Matter Microstructure Cannot Cheat Diffusional Kurtosis
Chen, Y., Zhao, X., Sha, M., Liu, Y., Ma, J., Ni, H., Qi, H., & Ming, D. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics · doi:10.20965/jaciii.2016.p0554
Microstructure Imaging by Diffusion MRI
Szczepankiewicz, F., & Westin, C. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35206-6_3
Brain Tumour Imaging: Developing Techniques and Future Perspectives
Croal, P. L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23273-3_7
Advanced Diffusion MRI : Non-Gaussian Analysis for the Clinic
Suzuki, Y., & Abe, O. (2020) · Japanese Journal of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.2463/jjmrm.2020-1710
Quantitative Methods in Brain Tumor Imaging
Goryawala, M., Weinberg, B. D., & Shim, H. (2021) · doi:10.1063/9780735423558_007
MRI: Magnetic Resonance Q-Space Imaging Using Generating Function and Bayesian Inference
Umezawa, E., Sonoda, Y., & Itoshiro, I. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4325-5_42
Auf dem Weg zu mehr Präzision in der Hirntumortherapie
Radbruch, A., & Hattingen, E. (2015) · Der Nervenarzt · doi:10.1007/s00115-015-4313-x
Xie, Y. H., Li, S., Shen, N., Gan, T., Zhang, S., Liu, W. V., & Zhu, W. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-468889/v1
Bai, J., Gao, A., Yuan, H., Zhao, G., Zhang, Y., Kong, D.-X., & Cheng, J. (2021) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Research · doi:10.26855/ijcemr.2021.04.006
Kiran, S. (2019) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.734083448.793566908
A New Frontier in Fighting Brain Cancer: Cutting Edge Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques
Nguyen, P., & Cain, J. A. (2022) · Journal of Student Research · doi:10.47611/jsrhs.v10i4.1952
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in brain tumours
Corrêa, D. G., & da Cruz, L. C. H. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822835-7.00025-1
Imaging and measuring diffusion in brain tumours
Maier, S. E., & Johansson, J. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822835-7.00009-3
Role of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Grading of Brain Gliomas
KHALEK, M. D. G. A. A. A., & YOUSRY, M. D. M. S. T. (2022) · The Medical Journal of Cairo University/The Medical Journal of Cairo University · doi:10.21608/mjcu.2022.257408
13. Observing Biological Information with Diffusion MRI
Suzuki, Y. (2022) · Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology · doi:10.6009/jjrt.2022-2128
Zhang, G., Lu, Y., Zheng, H., Kong, L., & Zheng, W. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25191-7_13
Laudicella, R., Mantarro, C., Catalfamo, B., Alongi, P., Gaeta, M., Minutoli, F., Baldari, S., & Bisdas, S. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119603627.ch6
Servati, M., Vaccaro, C., Diller, E. E., da Silva, R. P., Mafra, F., Cao, S., Stanley, K., Cohen‐Gadol, A., & Parker, J. G. (2024) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo14060337
Diffusion kurtosis imaging for different brain masses characterization
Abdelnasser, R. M., Galeel, A. A., Farhoud, A., Mazloum, Y., & Reda, M. I. (2024) · The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1186/s43055-024-01315-x
Ma, Z., Cheng, J., Lü, L., Cheng, M., Wang, X., Wei, D., & Zhao, X. W. (2025) · Acta Radiologica · doi:10.1177/02841851241299086
Zhao, H., Hou, Z., He, Q., Liu, X., & Xie, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1543619
Interpreting Survival Predictor Model for Glioblastoma Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Rajput, S., Kapdi, R., Raval, M. S., & Roy, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-87660-8_6
Shen, P., Li, Y., Xu, W., Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Yang, G., Du, J., Zhang, H., & Tan, Y. Q. (2025) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2025.110528
Zhang, Z., Vernekar, D., Qian, W., & Kim, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13669578
Contributions à l’estimation et trajectographie en IRM de diffusion et aide au diagnostic
Laib, Z. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/88d47d65z0d7az4537z9641z649b1ce24397
The ORION framework for outlier-robust parameter estimation in diffusion kurtosis imaging
Anania, V., Jeurissen, B., Billiet, T., Sijbers, J., & den Dekker, A. J. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-62390-w
Self-citationChristodoulou, R. C., Natu, R., Fakidi, Z., Vamvouras, G., Papageorgiou, P. S., Vassiliou, E. K., Solomou, E. E., Papageorgiou, S. G., & Georgiou, M. F. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1918991
Raab, P., & Lanfermann, H. (2015) · Medical radiology · doi:10.1007/174_2015_1052
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Cauter, S., Veraart, J., Sijbers, J., Peeters, R. R., Himmelreich, U., De Keyzer, F., Van Gool, S. W., Van Calenbergh, F., De Vleeschouwer, S., Van Hecke, W., & Sunaert, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 263
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 492-501
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2166244453
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 20.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Keywords
- glioma grading, diffusion kurtosis imaging, mean kurtosis, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, normal-appearing white matter, posterior limb of internal capsule, diagnostic accuracy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Contrast Media, Female, Glioma, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Male, Meglumine, Middle Aged, Organometallic Compounds, Prospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Anisotropy, Statistics, Nonparametric, Area Under Curve, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoplasm Grading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review