Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Pancreas: Current Status and Recommendations

Barral, Matthias, Taouli, Bachir, Guiu, Boris, Koh, Doh-Mu, Luciani, Alain, Manfredi, Riccardo, Vilgrain, Valérie, Hoeffel, Christine, Kanematsu, Masayuki, Soyer, Philippe·2015·Radiology

Abstract

Advances in image quality over the past few years, mainly due to refinements in hardware and coil systems, have made diffusion-weighted ( DW diffusion weighted ) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging a promising technique for the detection and characterization of pancreatic conditions. DW diffusion weighted MR imaging can be routinely implemented in clinical protocols, as it can be performed relatively quickly, does not require administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents, and enables qualitative and quantitative assessment of tissue diffusivity (diffusion coefficients). In this review, acquisition parameters, postprocessing, and quantification methods applied to pancreatic DW diffusion weighted MR imaging will be discussed. The current common clinical uses of DW diffusion weighted MR imaging (ie, pancreatic lesion detection and characterization) and the less-common applications of DW diffusion weighted MR imaging used for the diagnosis of pancreatic parenchymal diseases will be reviewed. Also, the limitations of the technique, mainly image quality and reproducibility of diffusion parameters, as well as future directions for pancreatic DW diffusion weighted MR imaging will be discussed. The utility of apparent diffusion coefficient ( ADC apparent diffusion coefficient ) measurement for the characterization of pancreatic lesions is now well accepted but there are a number of limitations. Future well-designed, multicenter studies are needed to better determine the most appropriate use of ADC apparent diffusion coefficient in the area of pancreatic disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.14130778

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Barral, M., Taouli, B., Guiu, B., Koh, D.-M., Luciani, A., Manfredi, R., Vilgrain, V., Hoeffel, C., Kanematsu, M., & Soyer, P.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2015-01
Volume
274
Issue
1
Pages
45-63
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2168999946
Cited by
208
References
3
FWCI
13.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Pancreas: Current Status and Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.14130778
The paper
Barral, M., Taouli, B., Guiu, B., Koh, D.-M., Luciani, A., Manfredi, R., Vilgrain, V., Hoeffel, C., Kanematsu, M., & Soyer, P. (2015). Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Pancreas: Current Status and Recommendations. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14130778

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.