Cited by 27Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Prediction of Pancreatic Cancer Based on Imaging Features in Patients With Duct Abnormalities

Open access
Chen, Wansu, Butler, Rebecca K., Zhou, Yichen, Parker, Rex A., Jeon, Christie Y., Wu, Bechien U.·2020·Pancreas

Abstract

Objectives: Abnormalities of the main pancreatic duct may be an early indicator of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We develop and validate algorithms that predict the risk of PDAC using features identified on cross-sectional imaging and other clinical characteristics collected through electronic medical records. Methods: Adult patients with abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in January 2006 to June 2016 demonstrating dilatation of main pancreatic duct were identified. Pancreas-related morphologic features were extracted from radiology reports using natural language processing. The cumulative incidence of PDAC with death as a competing risk was estimated using multistate models. Model discrimination was assessed using c-index. The models were internally validated using bootstrapping. Results: The cohort consisted of 7819 patients (mean age, 71 years; 65% female). A total of 781 patients (10%) developed PDAC within 3 years after the first eligible imaging study. The final models achieved reasonable discrimination (c-index, 0.825–0.833). The 3-year average risk of PDAC in the top 5% of the total eligible patients was 56.0%, more than 20 times of the average risk among the bottom 50% of patients. Conclusions: Prediction models combining imaging features and clinical measures can be used to further stratify the risk of pancreatic cancer among patients with pancreas ductal dilatation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001499

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wansu Chen and Bechien U. Wu have previously reported work using natural language processing to identify individuals at risk for pancreatic cancer based on radiology reports.

    “Wansu Chen and Bechien U. Wu of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California have previously reported work using natural language processing to identify individuals at risk for pancreatic cancer based on radiology reports.159”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [25]Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1993: 436.
  2. [26]Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application: (Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
  3. [28]Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for survey nonresponse. New York, NY: Wiley; 1987.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, W., Butler, R. K., Zhou, Y., Parker, R. A., Jeon, C. Y., & Wu, B. U.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Los Angeles Medical Center (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Wansu
  • Butler, Rebecca K.
  • Zhou, Yichen
Venue
Pancreas
Published
2020-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
413-419
ISSN
  • 0885-3177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4828
OpenAlex
W3010821239
Cited by
27
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pancreas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK108314)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic duct dilatation, multi-state models, competing risk of death, risk stratification, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging
MeSH terms
Data Warehousing, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Dilatation, Pathologic, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Ducts, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Incidence, Risk Assessment, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review