Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,070

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Open access
Heimbach, Julie K., Kulik, Laura M., Finn, Richard S., Sirlin, Claude B., Abecassis, Michael M., Roberts, Lewis R., Zhu, Andrew X., Murad, M. Hassan, Marrero, Jorge A.·2018·Hepatology

Abstract

Potential conflict of interest: Laura M. Kulik is on the advisory board for Gilead, Bayer, Eisai, Salix, and Bristol‐Myers Squibb. Richard Finn consults for Pfizer, Bayer, Novartis, Merck, and Bristol‐Myers Squibb. Claude B. Sirlin consults for and has received grants from Virtualscopics. Lewis R. Roberts consults for Wako, Medscape, and Axis; advises Tavec and Bayer; is on the speakers' bureau for Onlive; and has received grants from Ariad, BTG, and Gilead. Andrew Zhu consults for Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Bayer. The funding for the development of this Practice Guideline was provided by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Guiding Principles and Objectives GUIDING PRINCIPLES This document presents official recommendations of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) on the surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurring in the setting of adults with cirrhosis. Unlike previous AASLD practice guidelines, the current guideline was developed in compliance with the Institute of Medicine standards for trustworthy practice guidelines and uses the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.1 Multiple systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to support the recommendations in this practice guideline. An enhanced understanding of the guideline can be obtained by reading the applicable portions of the systematic reviews. In addition, more detailed information may be found in the associated guidance document related to clinically important aspects of HCC that lacked sufficient evidence to warrant a systematic review. The guideline focuses on a broad spectrum of clinical practice, including surveillance of patients with cirrhosis for HCC, establishing the diagnosis of HCC, and various therapeutic options for the treatment of HCC. To address other issues on HCC such as epidemiology, staging, and additional aspects of diagnosis and treatment, the authors have created a new guidance document that will be published soon and is based upon the previous HCC AASLD guidelines by Bruix and Sherman.2 KEY QUESTIONS The guideline developers from the AASLD identified key questions that health care providers are faced with frequently in the evaluation and management of patients with HCC. These questions were: Should adults with cirrhosis undergo surveillance for HCC? If so, which surveillance test is best? Should adults with cirrhosis and suspected HCC undergo diagnostic evaluation with multiphasic computed tomography (CT) or multiphasic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? Should adults with cirrhosis and an indeterminate hepatic nodule undergo a biopsy, repeated imaging, or alternative imaging for the diagnostic evaluation? Should adults with Child‐Pugh class A cirrhosis and early‐stage HCC (T1 or T2) be treated with resection or local‐regional (LRT) therapy? Should adults with cirrhosis and HCC that has been resected or ablated successfully undergo adjuvant therapy? Should adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation and HCC (T1) be treated or undergo observation? Should adults with cirrhosis and HCC (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network [OPTN] T2) awaiting liver transplantation undergo transplantation alone or transplantation with bridging therapy while waiting? Should adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation and HCC beyond Milan criteria (T3) undergo transplantation after being down‐staged to within Milan criteria? Should adults with cirrhosis and HCC (T2 or T3, no vascular involvement) who are not candidates for resection or transplantation be treated with transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, or external radiation? Should adults with Child‐Pugh class A/B cirrhosis and advanced HCC with macrovascular invasion and/or metastatic disease be treated with systemic or locoregional therapies or no therapy? TARGET AUDIENCE This guideline is intended primarily for health care providers who care for patients with cirrhosis. Additionally, the guideline may inform policy decisions regarding patients with HCC. Background BURDEN OF DISEASE According to the World Health Organization, HCC is the fifth most common tumor worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer‐related death (http://globocan.iarc.fr/old/FactSheets/cancers/liver-new.asp). Male‐to‐female predominance is greater than 2:1 with liver cancer, and approximately 83% of the estimated 782,000 new HCC cases in 2012 occurred in less developed regions of the world, with East and South Asia plus sub‐Saharan Africa being the regions of highest incidence, Southern Europe and North America being the regions of intermediate incidence, and Northern Europe and South Central Asia being the regions of lowest incidence.3 The incidence of HCC has been rising rapidly in the United States over the last 20 years.4 According to estimates from the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.29086

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 2011, Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update, Hepatology, 53, 1020, 10.1002/hep.24199 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2016, Comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma in Eastern versus Western populations, Cancer, 122, 3430, 10.1002/cncr.30237 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2016, International trends in liver cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype, 1978‐2007, Int J Cancer, 139, 1534, 10.1002/ijc.30211 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2016, Future of hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in the United States forecast through 2030, J Clin Oncol, 34, 1787, 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.7412 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2016, Population attributable fractions of risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States, Cancer, 122, 1757, 10.1002/cncr.29971 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2004, Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: incidence and risk factors, Gastroenterology, 127, S35
  7. 2011, Increasing prevalence of HCC and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, Gastroenterology, 140, 1182, 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.032 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2011, Hepatocellular carcinoma, N Engl J Med, 365, 1118, 10.1056/NEJMra1001683 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2015, Screening fundamentals, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 1997, 15
  10. 1980, Basic issues in population screening for cancer, J Natl Cancer Inst, 64, 1263
  11. 2004, Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma, J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 130, 417
  12. 2015, Update on biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 13, 237, 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.10.038 · DOI
  13. 2009, Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: history and epidemiology, Radiol Clin North Am, 47, 827, 10.1016/j.rcl.2009.05.003 · DOI
  14. 2016, Contrast‐induced nephropathy in CT: incidence, risk factors and strategies for prevention, Eur Radiol, 26, 3310, 10.1007/s00330-015-4155-8 · DOI
  15. 2008, Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma, Hepatology, 47, 97, 10.1002/hep.21966 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2009, Small nodules (1–2ccm) in liver cirrhosis: characterization with contrast‐enhanced ultrasound, Eur J Radiol, 72, 418, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.011 · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.011
  17. 2010, The impact of vascular and nonvascular findings on the noninvasive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma based on the EASL and AASLD criteria, Am J Gastroenterol, 105, 599, 10.1038/ajg.2009.654 · doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.654
  18. 2013, Characterization of primary and recurrent nodules in liver cirrhosis using contrast‐enhanced ultrasound: which vascular criteria should be adopted?, Ultraschall Med, 34, 280, 10.1055/s-0033-1335024 · DOI
  19. 2014, Clinical and economical impact of 2010 AASLD guidelines for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, J Hepatol, 60, 995, 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.01.006 · DOI
  20. 2008, Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound assessment of arterial vascularization of small nodules arising in the cirrhotic liver, Dig Liver Dis, 40, 206, 10.1016/j.dld.2007.10.006 · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2007.10.006
  21. 2010, The diagnostic and economic impact of contrast imaging techniques in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis, Gut, 59, 638, 10.1136/gut.2009.187286 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 2015, Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of small atypical hepatocellular carcinomas from dysplastic nodules in cirrhosis, Dig Liver Dis, 47, 775, 10.1016/j.dld.2015.05.001 · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2015.05.001
  23. 2007, Seeding following percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma. What is the risk and the outcome? Seeding risk for percutaneous approach of HCC, Cancer Treat Rev, 33, 437, 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2011, Indeterminate 1‐2‐cm nodules found on hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: biopsy for all, some, or none?, Hepatology, 54, 2048, 10.1002/hep.24638 · DOI
  25. 2005, Importance of small (≤20‐mm) enhancing lesions seen only during the hepatic arterial phase at MR imaging of the cirrhotic liver: evaluation and comparison with whole explanted liver, Radiology, 237, 938, 10.1148/radiol.2373041364 · doi:10.1148/radiol.2373041364
  26. 2005, Outcome of small (10‐20 mm) arterial phase‐enhancing nodules seen on triphasic liver CT in patients with cirrhosis or chronic liver disease, Am J Gastroenterol, 100, 1523, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41814.x · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41814.x
  27. 2007, The clinical outcome of small (<20 mm) arterially enhancing nodules on MRI in the cirrhotic liver, Am J Gastroenterol, 102, 1654, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01338.x · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01338.x
  28. 2008, Small hypervascular enhancing lesions on arterial phase images of multiphase dynamic computed tomography in cirrhotic liver, J Comput AssistTomogr, 32, 39
  29. 2008, Small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: limited value of portal and delayed phases on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, Acta Radiologica, 49, 735, 10.1080/02841850802120045 · doi:10.1080/02841850802120045
  30. 2008, Clinical implication of small (<20 mm) enhancing hepatic nodules observed only during three‐dimensional gadobenate dimeglumine‐enhanced hepatic arterial‐phase MRI of the hepatitis B virus‐induced mild cirrhosis, Clin Imaging, 32, 453, 10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.05.002 · doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.05.002
  31. 2010, Value of delayed hypointensity and delayed enhancing rim in magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic liver, J Magn Reson Imaging, 32, 360, 10.1002/jmri.22271 · doi:10.1002/jmri.22271
  32. 2011, Analysis of gadobenate dimeglumine–enhanced MR findings for characterizing small (1–2‐cm) hepatic nodules in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma, Radiology, 259, 730, 10.1148/radiol.11101549 · doi:10.1148/radiol.11101549
  33. 2012, Non‐invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma ≤2 cm in cirrhosis. Diagnostic accuracy assessing fat, capsule and signal intensity at dynamic MRI, J Hepatol, 56, 1317, 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2016, Imaging outcomes of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2014 category 2, 3, and 4 observations detected at CT and MR imaging, Radiology, 281, 152173
  35. 2015, Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System with MR imaging: evaluation in nodules 20 mm or smaller detected in cirrhosis at screening US, Radiology, 275, 698, 10.1148/radiol.15141132 · DOI
  36. 2012, Accuracy and disagreement of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplastic nodules: role of biopsy, Hepatology, 55, 800, 10.1002/hep.24746 · DOI
  37. 2013, Radiofrequency (thermal) ablation versus no intervention or other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1
  38. 2010, A randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for HCC conforming to the Milan criteria, Ann Surg., 252, 903, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181efc656 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 2012, A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma, J Hepatol, 57, 794, 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 2006, A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma, Ann Surg, 243, 321, 10.1097/01.sla.0000201480.65519.b8 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 2016, Randomized clinical trial of chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation versus partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria, Br J Surg, 103, 348, 10.1002/bjs.10061 · DOI
  42. 2014, Partial hepatectomy vs transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable multiple hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria: a RCT, J Hepatol, 61, 82, 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.03.012 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2015, Prognostic relevance of objective response according to EASL criteria and mRECIST criteria in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with loco‐regional therapies: a literature‐based meta‐analysis, PLoS One, 10, e0133488, 10.1371/journal.pone.0133488 · DOI
  44. 2000, Different risk factors and prognosis for early and late intrahepatic recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma, Cancer, 89, 500, 10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<500::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI · Paper page
  45. 1996, Prevention of second primary tumors by an acyclic retinoid, polyprenoic acid, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Prevention Study Group, N Engl J Med, 334, 1561, 10.1056/NEJM199606133342402 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 2013, A meta‐analysis of adjuvant therapy after potentially curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, Can J Gastroenterol, 27, 351, 10.1155/2013/417894 · DOI
  47. 2013, Effect and safety of interferon for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis, PLoS One, 8, e61361, 10.1371/journal.pone.0061361 · DOI
  48. 2015, Current systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the literature, World J Hepatol, 7, 1412, 10.4254/wjh.v7.i10.1412 · DOI
  49. 2016, Early occurrence and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV‐related cirrhosis treated with direct‐acting antivirals, J Hepatol, 65, 727, 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2015, Statin and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and death in a hospital‐based hepatitis B‐infected population: a propensity score landmark analysis, J Hepatol, 63, 1190, 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.009 · DOI
  51. 2008, Validation of the HCC‐MELD for dropout probability in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing locoregional therapy, Clin Transplant, 22, 469, 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2008.00811.x · doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2008.00811.x
  52. 2016, Intention to treat outcome of T1 hepatocellular carcinoma with the “wait and not ablate” approach until meeting T2 criteria for liver transplant listing, Liver Transpl, 22, 178, 10.1002/lt.24360 · DOI
  53. 1996, Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis, N Engl J Med, 334, 693, 10.1056/NEJM199603143341104 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 1998, Liver transplantation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: the tumor‐node‐metastasis classification does not have prognostic power, Hepatology, 27, 1572, 10.1002/hep.510270616 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 1999, Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, Semin Liver Dis, 19, 311, 10.1055/s-2007-1007120 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 2003, A follow‐up analysis of the pattern and predictors of dropout from the waiting list for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the current organ allocation policy, Liver Transplant, 9, 684, 10.1053/jlts.2003.50147 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 2012, Risk factors for liver transplant waitlist dropout in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, Clin Transplant, 26, E359
  58. 2008, Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States, 1997‐2006, Am J Transplant, 8, 958, 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02174.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. 2012, Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report, Lancet Oncol, 13, e11, 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70175-9 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 2010, The place of downstaging for hepatocellular carcinoma, J Hepatol, 52, 930, 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.12.032 · DOI
  61. 2008, Bridging locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation, Ann Surg Oncol, 15, 3169, 10.1245/s10434-008-0071-3 · DOI
  62. 2015, Transarterial chemoembolization prior to liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, Ann Transplant, 20, 764, 10.12659/AOT.896778 · doi:10.12659/aot.896778
  63. 2013, Tumor biology and pre‐transplant locoregional treatments determine outcomes in patients with T3 hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation, Clin Transplant, 27, 311, 10.1111/ctr.12089 · doi:10.1111/ctr.12089
  64. 2015, Downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and pooled analysis, Liver Transplant, 21, 1142, 10.1002/lt.24169 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 2003, Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival, Hepatology, 37, 429, 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 2011, Transarterial (chemo)embolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1
  67. 2004, Evaluation of transcatheter arterial embolization prior to percutaneous tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial, Liver Int, 24, 625, 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2004.0963.x · doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2004.0963.x
  68. 1998, Transarterial embolization versus symptomatic treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a randomized, controlled trial in a single institution, Hepatology, 27, 1578, 10.1002/hep.510270617 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 2008, Multicentre randomised phase III trial comparing Tamoxifen alone or with transarterial lipiodol chemoembolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 9402), Eur J Cancer, 44, 528, 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.004 · DOI
  70. 1993, Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by lipiodol‐targeted transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). A multicenter randomized trial, Hepatology, 18, A58, 10.1016/0270-9139(93)91759-L · doi:10.1016/0270-9139(93)91759-l
  71. 2006, Postoperative transhepatic arterial chemoembolization and portal vein chemotherapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized study with 131 cases, Dig Surg, 23, 235, 10.1159/000095396 · DOI
  72. 2002, Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, Hepatology, 35, 1164, 10.1053/jhep.2002.33156 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 1990, A randomized trial of hepatic arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, J Hepatol, 11, 181, 10.1016/0168-8278(90)90110-D · DOI · Paper page
  74. 1998, Treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with lipiodol chemoembolization: a multicenter randomized trial. Groupe CHC, J Hepatol, 29, 129, 10.1016/S0168-8278(98)80187-6 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 2002, Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 359, 1734, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X · DOI · Paper page
  76. 2001, Chemoembolization improves survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), J Hepatol, 34, 11, 10.1016/S0168-8278(01)80036-2 · doi:10.1016/s0168-8278(01)80036-2
  77. 2015, Transarterial chemoembolization: evidences from the literature and applications in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, World J Hepatol, 7, 2009, 10.4254/wjh.v7.i16.2009 · DOI
  78. 2016, Yttrium‐90 microsphere radioembolisation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1
  79. 2015, Pilot randomized trial of selective internal radiation therapy vs chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, Liver Int, 35, 1715, 10.1111/liv.12750 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 2016, Y90 radioembolization significantly prolongs time to progression compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, Gastroenterology, 151, 1155, 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.029 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 2015, Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials, Int J Clin Exp Med, 8, 10388
  82. 2015, Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus radiotherapy compared with chemoembolization alone for hepatocellular carcinoma, JAMA Oncol, 1, 756, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2189 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 2012, Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: subanalyses of a phase III trial, J Hepatol, 57, 821, 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.06.014 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 2012, Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to baseline status: subset analyses of the phase III Sorafenib Asia–Pacific trial, Eur J Cancer, 48, 1452, 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 2014, Linifanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial, J Clin Oncol, 33, 172
  86. 2014, SEARCH: a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of sorafenib plus erlotinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, J Clin Oncol, 33, 559
  87. 2015, Comparison of chemoembolization with and without radiation therapy and sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a propensity score analysis, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 26, 320, 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.10.019 · DOI
  88. 2014, Overall survival in response to sorafenib versus radiotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein tumor thrombosis: propensity score analysis, BMC Gastroenterol, 14, 84, 10.1186/1471-230X-14-84 · DOI
  89. 2015, A comparative study between sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis, J Gastroenterol, 50, 445, 10.1007/s00535-014-0978-3 · DOI

Cited by

See all 4,070

Metadata

Authors
Heimbach, J. K., Kulik, L. M., Finn, R. S., Sirlin, C. B., Abecassis, M. M., Roberts, L. R., Zhu, A. X., Murad, M. H., & Marrero, J. A.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2017-12-19
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
358-380
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W2582878252
Cited by
4,070
References
7
FWCI
191.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.29086
The paper
Heimbach, J. K., Kulik, L. M., Finn, R. S., Sirlin, C. B., Abecassis, M. M., Roberts, L. R., Zhu, A. X., Murad, M. H., & Marrero, J. A. (2018). AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29086

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.