Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in Patients Positive for COVID-19

Open access
Wong, Ho Yuen Frank, Lam, Hiu Yin Sonia, Fong, Ambrose Ho-Tung, Leung, Siu Ting, Chin, Thomas Wing-Yan, Lo, Christine Shing Yen, Lui, Macy Mei-Sze, Lee, Jonan Chun Yin, Chiu, Keith Wan-Hang, Chung, Tom Wai-Hin, Lee, Elaine Yuen Phin, Wan, Eric Yuk Fai, Hung, Ivan Fan Ngai, Lam, Tina Poy Wing, Kuo, Michael D., Ng, Ming-Yen·2020·Radiology

Abstract

Background Current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) radiologic literature is dominated by CT, and a detailed description of chest radiography appearances in relation to the disease time course is lacking. Purpose To describe the time course and severity of findings of COVID-19 at chest radiography and correlate these with real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, or SARS-CoV-2, nucleic acid. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 confirmed by using RT-PCR and chest radiographic examinations who were admitted across four hospitals and evaluated between January and March 2020. Baseline and serial chest radiographs (n = 255) were reviewed with RT-PCR. Correlation with concurrent CT examinations (n = 28) was performed when available. Two radiologists scored each chest radiograph in consensus for consolidation, ground-glass opacity, location, and pleural fluid. A severity index was determined for each lung. The lung scores were summed to produce the final severity score. Results The study was composed of 64 patients (26 men; mean age, 56 years ± 19 [standard deviation]). Of these, 58 patients had initial positive findings with RT-PCR (91%; 95% confidence interval: 81%, 96%), 44 patients had abnormal findings at baseline chest radiography (69%; 95% confidence interval: 56%, 80%), and 38 patients had initial positive findings with RT-PCR testing and abnormal findings at baseline chest radiography (59%; 95% confidence interval: 46%, 71%). Six patients (9%) showed abnormalities at chest radiography before eventually testing positive for COVID-19 with RT-PCR. Sensitivity of initial RT-PCR (91%; 95% confidence interval: 83%, 97%) was higher than that of baseline chest radiography (69%; 95% confidence interval: 56%, 80%) (P = .009). Radiographic recovery (mean, 6 days ± 5) and virologic recovery (mean, 8 days ± 6) were not significantly different (P = .33). Consolidation was the most common finding (30 of 64; 47%) followed by ground-glass opacities (21 of 64; 33%). Abnormalities at chest radiography had a peripheral distribution (26 of 64; 41%) and lower zone distribution (32 of 64; 50%) with bilateral involvement (32 of 64; 50%). Pleural effusion was uncommon (two of 64; 3%). The severity of findings at chest radiography peaked at 10–12 days from the date of symptom onset. Conclusion Findings at chest radiography in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 frequently showed bilateral lower zone consolidation, which peaked at 10–12 days from symptom onset. © RSNA, 2020

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2020201160

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,477

Metadata

Authors
Wong, H. Y. F., Lam, H. Y. S., Fong, A. H.-T., Leung, S. T., Chin, T. W.-Y., Lo, C. S. Y., Lui, M. M.-S., Lee, J. C. Y., Chiu, K. W.-H., Chung, T. W.-H., Lee, E. Y. P., Wan, E. Y. F., Hung, I. F. N., Lam, T. P. W., Kuo, M. D., & Ng, M.-Y.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2020-08
Volume
296
Issue
2
Pages
E72-E78
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W3013130152
Cited by
1,477
References
5
FWCI
40.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in Patients Positive for COVID-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2020201160
The paper
Wong, H. Y. F., Lam, H. Y. S., Fong, A. H.-T., Leung, S. T., Chin, T. W.-Y., Lo, C. S. Y., Lui, M. M.-S., Lee, J. C. Y., Chiu, K. W.-H., Chung, T. W.-H., Lee, E. Y. P., Wan, E. Y. F., Hung, I. F. N., Lam, T. P. W., Kuo, M. D., & Ng, M.-Y. (2020). Frequency and Distribution of Chest Radiographic Findings in Patients Positive for COVID-19. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020201160

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.