Cited by 41Advanced X-ray and CT ImagingBone health and osteoporosis researchMedical Imaging and Analysis

Bone Mineral Density Quantification from Localizer Radiographs: Accuracy and Precision of Energy-integrating Detector CT and Photon-counting Detector CT

Open access
Nowak, Tristan, Eberhard, Matthias, Schmidt, Bernhard, Frey, Diana, Distler, Oliver, Saltybaeva, Natalia, Alkadhi, Hatem, Euler, André·2021·Radiology

Abstract

Background Bone mineral density (BMD) could be derived from CT localizer radiographs and could potentially enable opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Purpose To assess the accuracy and precision of BMD measurement using two localizer radiographs obtained with energy-integrating detector CT and a single localizer radiograph obtained with photon-counting detector CT. Materials and Methods A calibration phantom and a porcine phantom with lumbar vertebrae were imaged with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner, a clinical energy-integrating detector CT scanner, and a prototype photon-counting detector CT scanner. Two localizer radiographs at different combinations of tube voltages were obtained with energy-integrating detector CT, and one localizer radiograph was obtained with photon-counting detector CT using different energy thresholds. BMD was calculated for all three approaches and compared with the known specifications in the calibration phantom. In the animal phantom, BMDs from both CT systems were compared with those from the DXA scanner (the reference standard). Accuracy was defined as the measurement error of BMD (ΔBMD), and precision was defined as the coefficient of variation (in percentage). Radiation doses were estimated. Nonparametric tests were applied. Results In the calibration phantom, ΔBMD was smaller with both CT systems compared with the DXA scanner (both P P = .65). The dose-area product in the animal phantom was 4.6 cGy ∙ cm 2 for DXA, 3.5-11.5…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2020202767

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nowak, T., Eberhard, M., Schmidt, B., Frey, D., Distler, O., Saltybaeva, N., Alkadhi, H., & Euler, A.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Euler, André
Venue
Radiology
Published
2021-01
Volume
298
Issue
1
Pages
147-152
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W3096943998
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
bone mineral density, energy-integrating detector CT, photon-counting CT, osteoporosis screening, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, measurement accuracy, measurement precision, radiation dose, tube voltage, energy threshold, lumbar vertebrae, calibration phantom, opportunistic screening, low-dose imaging, coefficient of variation
MeSH terms
Animals, Lumbar Vertebrae, Swine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Photons, Phantoms, Imaging, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review