Cited by 29Bone health and osteoporosis researchAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingMedical Imaging and Analysis

DXA-equivalent quantification of bone mineral density using dual-layer spectral CT scout scans

Laugerette, Alexis, Schwaiger, Benedikt J., Brown, Kevin, Frerking, Lena C., Kopp, Felix K., Mei, Kai, Sellerer, Thorsten, Kirschke, Jan +8 more·2019·European Radiology

Abstract

Objectives To develop and evaluate a method for areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurement based on dual-layer spectral CT scout scans. Methods A post-processing algorithm using a pair of 2D virtual mono-energetic scout images (VMSIs) was established in order to semi-automatically compute the aBMD at the spine similarly to DXA, using manual soft tissue segmentation, semi-automatic segmentation for the vertebrae, and automatic segmentation for the background. The method was assessed based on repetitive measurements of the standardized European Spine Phantom (ESP) using the standard scout scan tube current (30 mA) and other tube currents (10 to 200 mA), as well as using fat-equivalent extension rings simulating different patient habitus, and was compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Moreover, the feasibility of the method was assessed in vivo in female patients. Results Derived from standard scout scans, aBMD values measured with the proposed method significantly correlated with DXA measurements (r = 0.9925, p Conclusions Based on dual-layer spectral scout scans, aBMD measurements were fast and reliable and significantly correlated with the according DXA measurements in phantoms. Considering the number of CT acquisitions performed worldwide, this method could allow truly opportunistic osteoporosis screening. Key points • 2D scout scans (localizer radiographs) from a dual-layer spectral CT scanner, which are mandatory parts of a CT examination, can be used to au…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-019-6005-6

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laugerette, A., Schwaiger, B. J., Brown, K., Frerking, L. C., Kopp, F. K., Mei, K., Sellerer, T., Kirschke, J., Baum, T., Gersing, A. S., Pfeiffer, D., Fingerle, A. A., Rummeny, E. J., Proksa, R., Noël, P. B., & Pfeiffer, F.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • Philips (Germany) (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Noël, Peter B.
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2019-02-13
Volume
29
Issue
9
Pages
4624-4634
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W2911756823
Cited by
29
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • BMBF (13GW0072C)
  • DFG (GRK2274)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
spectral CT, dual-layer spectral CT, spine, osteoporosis screening, opportunistic screening, tube current, soft tissue segmentation, vertebral segmentation, precision and accuracy, female patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Algorithms, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, Spine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Bone Density, Phantoms, Imaging, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review