The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intracranial Mass Lesions: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Susceptibility-weighted Echo-planar Perfusion MR Imaging
Abstract
Dynamic contrast agent-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides physiologic information that complements the anatomic information available with conventional MR imaging. Analysis of dynamic data from perfusion MR imaging, based on tracer kinetic theory, yields quantitative estimates of cerebral blood volume that reflect the underlying microvasculature and angiogenesis. Perfusion MR imaging is a fast and robust imaging technique that is increasingly used as a research tool to help evaluate and understand intracranial disease processes and as a clinical tool to help diagnose, manage, and understand intracranial mass lesions. With the increasing number of applications of perfusion MR imaging, it is important to understand the principles underlying the technique. In this review, the essential underlying physics and methods of dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging are described. The clinical applications of cerebral blood volume maps obtained with perfusion MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of intracranial mass lesions, as well as the pitfalls and limitations of the technique, are discussed. Emphasis is on the clinical role of perfusion MR imaging in providing insight into the underlying pathophysiology of cerebral microcirculation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth
O'Reilly, M. S., Boehm, T., Shing, Y., Fukai, N., Vasios, G., Lane, W. S., Flynn, E., Birkhead, J. R., Olsen, B. R., & Folkman, J. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81848-6 · Cited by 4,486
Cited by
Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic
McDonald, D. M., & Choyke, P. L. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0603-713 · Cited by 1,016
Comparative Overview of Brain Perfusion Imaging Techniques
Wintermark, M., Sesay, M., Barbier, E., Borbély, K., Dillon, W. P., Eastwood, J. D., Glenn, T. C., Grandin, C. B., Pedraza, S., Soustiel, J.-F., et al. (2005) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000177884.72657.8b · Cited by 592
Weinstein, J. S., Varallyay, C. G., Dosa, E., Gahramanov, S., Hamilton, B., Rooney, W. D., Muldoon, L. L., & Neuwelt, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2009.192 · Cited by 500
Perfusion MRI: The Five Most Frequently Asked Clinical Questions
Essig, M., Nguyen, T. B., Shiroishi, M. S., Saake, M., Provenzale, J. M., Enterline, D. S., Anzalone, N., Dörfler, A., Rovira, À., Wintermark, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.12.9544 · Cited by 344
Sourbron, S., Ingrisch, M., Siefert, A., Reiser, M., & Herrmann, K. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22005 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Cha, S., Knopp, E. A., Johnson, G., Wetzel, S. G., Litt, A. W., & Zagzag, D.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-29
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2153428956
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intracranial Mass Lesions: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Susceptibility-weighted Echo-planar Perfusion MR Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2231010594
- The paper
- Cha, S., Knopp, E. A., Johnson, G., Wetzel, S. G., Litt, A. W., & Zagzag, D. (2002). Intracranial Mass Lesions: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Susceptibility-weighted Echo-planar Perfusion MR Imaging. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2231010594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.