The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Overview of Brain Perfusion Imaging Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose— Numerous imaging techniques have been developed and applied to evaluate brain hemodynamics. Among these are positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, Xenon-enhanced computed tomography, dynamic perfusion computed tomography, MRI dynamic susceptibility contrast, arterial spin labeling, and Doppler ultrasound. These techniques give similar information about brain hemodynamics in the form of parameters such as cerebral blood flow or cerebral blood volume. All of them are used to characterize the same types of pathological conditions. However, each technique has its own advantages and drawbacks. Summary of Review— This article addresses the main imaging techniques dedicated to brain hemodynamics. It represents a comparative overview established by consensus among specialists of the various techniques. Conclusions— For clinicians, this article should offer a clearer picture of the pros and cons of currently available brain perfusion imaging techniques and assist them in choosing the proper method for every specific clinical setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phelps, M. E., Huang, S. C., Hoffman, E. J., Selin, C., Sokoloff, L., & Kuhl, D. E. (1979) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410060502 · Cited by 2,418
Kety, S. S., & Schmidt, C. F. (1948) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci101994 · Cited by 2,059
Detre, J. A., Leigh, J. S., Williams, D. S., & Koretsky, A. P. (1992) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910230106 · Cited by 1,571
Østergaard, L., Weisskoff, R. M., Chesler, D. A., Gyldensted, C., & Rosen, B. R. (1996) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910360510 · Cited by 1,512
On the Theory of the Indicator-Dilution Method for Measurement of Blood Flow and Volume
Meier, P., & Zierler, K. L. (1954) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1954.6.12.731 · Cited by 1,274
A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling
Buxton, R. B., Frank, L. R., Wong, E. C., Siewert, B., Warach, S., & Edelman, R. R. (1998) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910400308 · Cited by 1,263
Frackowiak, R. S. J., Lenzi, G.-L., Jones, T., & Heather, J. D. (1980) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-198012000-00001 · Cited by 1,242
The [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization in man.
Reivich, M., Kuhl, D., Wolf, A., Greenberg, J., Phelps, M., Ido, T., Casella, V, Fowler, J., Hoffman, E., Alavi, A., et al. (1979) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.44.1.127 · Cited by 1,220
Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents
Rosen, B. R., Belliveau, J. W., Vevea, J. M., & Brady, T. J. (1990) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910140211 · Cited by 1,151
Law, M., Yang, S., Wang, H., Babb, J. S., Johnson, G., Cha, S., Knopp, E. A., & Zagzag, D. (2003) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,084
Cited by
Diffuse optics for tissue monitoring and tomography
Durduran, T., Choe, R., Baker, W. B., & Yodh, A. G. (2010) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/7/076701 · Cited by 1,161
Perfusion MRI: The Five Most Frequently Asked Clinical Questions
Essig, M., Nguyen, T. B., Shiroishi, M. S., Saake, M., Provenzale, J. M., Enterline, D. S., Anzalone, N., Dörfler, A., Rovira, À., Wintermark, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.12.9544 · Cited by 344
Self-citationMeasuring cerebrovascular reactivity: what stimulus to use?
Fierstra, J., Sobczyk, O., Battisti‐Charbonney, A., Mandell, D. M., Poublanc, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., Duffin, J., & Fisher, J. A. (2013) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2013.259150 · Cited by 318
Vernooij, M. W., van der Lugt, A., Ikram, M. A., Wielopolski, P. A., Vrooman, H. A., Hofman, A., Krestin, G. P., & Breteler, M. M. (2008) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600526 · Cited by 156
Total cerebral blood flow, white matter lesions and brain atrophy: the SMART-MR study
Appelman, A. P., van der Graaf, Y., Vincken, K. L., Tiehuis, A. M., Witkamp, T. D., Mali, W. P., Geerlings, M. I., & SMART Study Group (2008) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600563 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Wintermark, M., Sesay, M., Barbier, E., Borbély, K., Dillon, W. P., Eastwood, J. D., Glenn, T. C., Grandin, C. B., Pedraza, S., Soustiel, J.-F., Nariai, T., Zaharchuk, G., Caillé, J.-M., Dousset, V., & Yonas, H.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e83-99
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2104683260
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Overview of Brain Perfusion Imaging Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000177884.72657.8b
- The paper
- Wintermark, M., Sesay, M., Barbier, E., Borbély, K., Dillon, W. P., Eastwood, J. D., Glenn, T. C., Grandin, C. B., Pedraza, S., Soustiel, J.-F., Nariai, T., Zaharchuk, G., Caillé, J.-M., Dousset, V., & Yonas, H. (2005). Comparative Overview of Brain Perfusion Imaging Techniques. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000177884.72657.8b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
