The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Nonionic Intravenous Contrast Agents at PET/CT Imaging: Phantom and Canine Studies
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the effects of intravenous contrast agents on quantitative values obtained with a combined positron emission tomographic (PET) and computed tomographic (CT) scanner by using several phantoms and a dog. Materials and methods Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was mixed with different concentrations of contrast agent with the same syringe (phantom 1), and the phantom was scanned. After image reconstruction with various attenuation maps, radioactivity concentrations were compared. Then, FDG solutions with (phantom 2) or surrounded by (phantom 3) various concentrations of contrast agent were scanned repeatedly, and radioactivity concentration was compared. Finally, PET and CT with and without contrast agent were performed in a dog. PET images were reconstructed by using different attenuation maps, and radioactivity concentrations were compared. The radioactivity concentration on germanium 68 (68Ge)-based corrected images was regarded as standard, and percentage bias, defined as difference divided by measured activity of 68Ge-based corrected images, was assessed. The relationship between the concentration of contrast agent and the percentage bias was assessed with the Pearson coefficient r, and the significance of correlations was evaluated with the Fisher z test. Results All phantom studies demonstrated that presence of a contrast agent resulted in overestimation of emission data. CT numbers showed a strong positive correlation with the percentage bias in…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, in organs with a particularly high concentration of the contrast agent (e.g., the liver, kidney, or blood vessels), these deviations can be higher [116,120,121].”
From Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation (2022) · cites this paper as [120]
Citations
Cites
A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology.
Beyer, T., Townsend, D. W., Brun, T., Kinahan, P. E., Charron, M., Roddy, R., Jerin, J., Young, J., Byars, L. G., & Nutt, R. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 1,655
Hamacher, K., Coenen, H. H., & Stöcklin, G. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 1,368
Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner
Kinahan, P. E., Townsend, D. W., Beyer, T., & Sashin, D. (1998) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.598392 · Cited by 946
Comparison and Evaluation of Retrospective Intermodality Brain Image Registration Techniques
West, J. B., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Wang, M. Y., Dawant, B. M., Maurer, C. R., KESSLER, R. M., Maciunas, R. J., Barillot, C., Lemoine, D., Collignon, A. M. F., et al. (1997) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199707000-00007 · Cited by 883
PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration
Goerres, G. W., Kamel, E. M., Heidelberg, T.-N. H., Schwitter, M. R., Burger, C., & von Schulthess, G. K. (2002) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-001-0710-4 · Cited by 332
Yamashita, Y., Komohara, Y., Takahashi, M., Uchida, M., Hayabuchi, N., Shimizu, T., & Narabayashi, I. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00se26718 · Cited by 250
Combined PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Impact on Patient Management
Kluetz, P. G. (2000) · Clinical Positron Imaging · doi:10.1016/s1095-0397(01)00055-3 · Cited by 224
Image Analysis in Patients with Cancer Studied with a Combined PET and CT Scanner
Charron, M., Beyer, T., Bohnen, N. N., Kinahan, P. E., Dachille, M., Jerin, J., Nutt, R., Meltzer, C. C., Villemagne, V. L., & TOWNSEND, D. W. (2000) · Clinical Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003072-200011000-00010 · Cited by 169
Nakamoto, Y., Osman, M., Cohade, C., Marshall, L. T., Links, J. M., Kohlmyer, S. G., & Wahl, R. L. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 161
Self-citationEffect of Injection Rate of Contrast Medium on Pancreatic and Hepatic Helical CT
TUBLIN, M. E., Tessler, F. N., Cheng, S. L., Peters, T. L., & McGovern, P. C. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja2197 · Cited by 135
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Delbeke D.Oncological applications of FDG PET imaging.J Nucl Med1999; 40:1706-1715.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–111 of 111
Jianwei, Y., Feng, Y., Fan, L., & Xiaohong, H. (2008) · 南京医科大学学报：英文版 · doi:10.1016/s1007-4376(08)60013-1
Pinaquy, J., Gordien, P., Tlili, G., Alberti, N., Salut, C., & Bordenave, L. (2014) · Médecine Nucléaire · doi:10.1016/j.mednuc.2014.08.002
Synergie de la TEP-TDM et du scanner en onco-hématologie
Ricard, F., Giammarile, F., Tychyj-Pinel, C., Houzard, C., Decullier, É., Chateau, F., Manichon, A., Orliaguet, I., Michallet, A., Salles, G., et al. (2013) · Journal de radiologie diagnostique et interventionnelle · doi:10.1016/j.jradio.2013.06.002
FDG-PET and PET-CT Imaging of Head and Neck Cancers
Menda, Y., & Graham, M. M. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-28026-2_13
Monte Carlo and experimental assessment of CT-based attenuation correction in PET
Zaidi, H., Voloshynovskiy, S., De, C.-D., Alavi, A., & Thiran, J. (2006)
Development and Characterization of a Liposome Imaging Agent
Zheng, J. (2009) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Garpered, S., Minarik, D., Frantz, S., Valind, S., & Wollmer, P. (2019) · Nuklearmedizin - NuclearMedicine · doi:10.1055/a-1038-9933
PET in the Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer
Sekine, T. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-3188-0_10
The Effect of PET/CT Images on SUV with the Correction of CT Image by Using Contrast Media
Ahn, S.-R., Park, H.-H., Park, M. S., Lee, S., Oh, S.-H., Lim, H., Kim, J.-S., & Lee, C.-H. (2009)
Vaquero, J. J., & Bacharach, S. L. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118754467.ch1
(2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-84628-100-8_18
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakamoto, Y., Chin, B. B., Kraitchman, D. L., Lawler, L. P., Marshall, L. T., & Wahl, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 227
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 817-824
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1995453959
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- PET/CT, fluorodeoxyglucose, attenuation correction, attenuation map, Hounsfield units, phantom study, canine model, PET quantification
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Contrast Media, Dogs, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Injections, Intravenous, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Phantoms, Imaging, Radiopharmaceuticals, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
