Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 792

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MR Imaging Relaxation Times of Abdominal and Pelvic Tissues Measured in Vivo at 3.0 T: Preliminary Results

de Bazelaire, Cedric M. J., Duhamel, Guillaume D., Rofsky, Neil M., Alsop, David C.·2004·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure T1 and T2 relaxation times of normal human abdominal and pelvic tissues and lumbar vertebral bone marrow at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relaxation time was measured in six healthy volunteers with an inversion-recovery method and different inversion times and a multiple spin-echo (SE) technique with different echo times to measure T1 and T2, respectively. Six images were acquired during one breath hold with a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot fast SE sequence. Signal intensities in regions of interest were fit to theoretical curves. Measurements were performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Relaxation times at 1.5 T were compared with those reported in the literature by using a one-sample t test. Differences in mean relaxation time between 1.5 and 3.0 T were analyzed with a two-sample paired t test. RESULTS: Relaxation times (mean +/- SD) at 3.0 T are reported for kidney cortex (T1, 1,142 msec +/- 154; T2, 76 msec +/- 7), kidney medulla (T1, 1,545 msec +/- 142; T2, 81 msec +/- 8), liver (T1, 809 msec +/- 71; T2, 34 msec +/- 4), spleen (T1, 1,328 msec +/- 31; T2, 61 msec +/- 9), pancreas (T1, 725 msec +/- 71; T2, 43 msec +/- 7), paravertebral muscle (T1, 898 msec +/- 33; T2, 29 msec +/- 4), bone marrow in L4 vertebra (T1, 586 msec +/- 73; T2, 49 msec +/- 4), subcutaneous fat (T1, 382 msec +/- 13; T2, 68 msec +/- 4), prostate (T1, 1,597 msec +/- 42; T2, 74 msec +/- 9), myometrium (T1, 1,514 msec +/- 156; T2, 79 msec +/- 10), endometrium (T1, 1,453 msec +/- 123; T2, 59 msec +/- 1), and cervix (T1, 1,616 msec +/- 61; T2, 83 msec +/- 7). On average, T1 relaxation times were 21% longer (P <.05) for kidney cortex, liver, and spleen and T2 relaxation times were 8% shorter (P <.05) for liver, spleen, and fat at 3.0 T; however, the fractional change in T1 and T2 relaxation times varied greatly with the organ. At 1.5 T, no significant differences (P >.05) in T1 relaxation time between the results of this study and the results of other studies for liver, kidney, spleen, and muscle tissue were found. CONCLUSION: T1 relaxation times are generally higher and T2 relaxation times are generally lower at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T, but the magnitude of change varies greatly in different tissues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2303021331

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 792

Metadata

Authors
de Bazelaire, C. M. J., Duhamel, G. D., Rofsky, N. M., & Alsop, D. C.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2004-03
Volume
230
Issue
3
Pages
652-659
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2130544939
Cited by
792
References
0
FWCI
19.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MR Imaging Relaxation Times of Abdominal and Pelvic Tissues Measured in Vivo at 3.0 T: Preliminary Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2303021331
The paper
de Bazelaire, C. M. J., Duhamel, G. D., Rofsky, N. M., & Alsop, D. C. (2004). MR Imaging Relaxation Times of Abdominal and Pelvic Tissues Measured in Vivo at 3.0 T: Preliminary Results. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303021331

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.