Cited by 247Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in cancer detectionGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Appropriateness of breast cancer prevention and screening recommendations provided by ChatGPT

Haver, Hana L., Ambinder, Emily B., Bahl, Manisha, Oluyemi, Eniola T., Jeudy, Jean, Yi, Paul H.·2023·Radiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.230424

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings of mixed performance align with similar reports of mixed performance across different tasks and clinical text datasets within cancer type-specific domains.

    “These findings align with similar reports of mixed performance across different tasks and clinical text datasets within cancer type-specific domains [45-47]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haver, H. L., Ambinder, E. B., Bahl, M., Oluyemi, E. T., Jeudy, J., & Yi, P. H.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Venue
Radiology
Published
2023-05-01
Volume
307
Issue
4
Pages
e230424-e230424
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W4362521774
Cited by
247
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 57
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
ChatGPT, breast cancer, cancer screening, preventive medicine, large language models
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review