The DOI matches its Crossref record.
T2 Relaxation Time of Cartilage at MR Imaging: Comparison with Severity of Knee Osteoarthritis
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in T2 values in femoral and tibial cartilage at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with varying degrees of osteoarthritis (OA) compared with healthy subjects and to develop a mapping and display method based on calculation of T2 z scores for visual grading and assessment of cartilage heterogeneity in patients with OA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Knee cartilage was evaluated in 55 subjects who were categorized with radiography as healthy (n = 7) or as having mild OA (n = 20) or severe OA (n = 28). Cartilage regions were determined with manual segmentation of an MR image acquired with spoiled gradients and fat suppression. The segmentation was applied to a map of T2 relaxation time and was analyzed in four knee cartilage compartments (ie, the medial and lateral tibia and femur). Differences between cartilage compartment T2 values and subject groups were analyzed with analysis of covariance. Correlations of cartilage T2 values with clinically reported symptoms and cartilage thickness and volume were examined. Cartilage T2 values were converted to z scores per voxel on the basis of normal population values in the same cartilage compartment to better interpret cartilage heterogeneity and variation from normal. RESULTS: Healthy subjects had mean T2 values of 32.1-35.0 msec, while patients with mild and severe OA had mean T2 values of 34.4-41.0 msec. All cartilage compartments except the lateral tibia showed significant (P <.05) increases in T2 relaxation time between healthy and diseased knees; however, no significant difference was found between patients with mild and severe OA. Correlation of T2 values with clinical symptoms and cartilage morphology was found predominantly in medial compartments. CONCLUSION: Femoral and medial tibial cartilage T2 values increase with the severity of OA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
In vivo T1ρ and T2 mapping of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee using 3 T MRI
Li, X., Benjamin Ma, C., Link, T. M., Castillo, D.-D., Blumenkrantz, G., Lozano, J., Carballido-Gamio, J., Ries, M., & Majumdar, S. (2007) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2007.01.011 · Cited by 485
Self-citationCrema, M. D., Roemer, F. W., Marra, M. D., Burstein, D., Gold, G. E., Eckstein, F., Baum, T., Mosher, T. J., Carrino, J. A., & Guermazi, A. (2011) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.311105084 · Cited by 448
Advances in Imaging of Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Roemer, F. W., Crema, M. D., Trattnig, S., & Guermazi, A. (2011) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.11101359 · Cited by 220
Kijowski, R., Blankenbaker, D. G., Munoz del Rio, A., Baer, G. S., & Graf, B. K. (2013) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.12121413 · Cited by 186
Liebl, H., Joseph, G., Nevitt, M. C., Singh, N., Heilmeier, U., Subburaj, K., Jungmann, P. M., McCulloch, C. E., Lynch, J. A., Lane, N. E., et al. (2015) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204157 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunn, T. C., Lu, Y., Jin, H., Ries, M. D., & Majumdar, S.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 592-598
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2015838124
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: T2 Relaxation Time of Cartilage at MR Imaging: Comparison with Severity of Knee Osteoarthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2322030976
- The paper
- Dunn, T. C., Lu, Y., Jin, H., Ries, M. D., & Majumdar, S. (2004). T2 Relaxation Time of Cartilage at MR Imaging: Comparison with Severity of Knee Osteoarthritis. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2322030976
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.