The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimated Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Full-Body CT Screening
Abstract
PURPOSE: To estimate the radiation-related cancer mortality risks associated with single or repeated full-body computed tomographic (CT) examinations by using standard radiation risk estimation methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The estimated dose to the lung or stomach from a single full-body CT examination is 14-21 mGy, which corresponds to a dose region for which there is direct evidence of increased cancer mortality in atomic bomb survivors. Total doses for repeated examinations are correspondingly higher. The authors used estimated cancer risks in a U.S. population derived from atomic bomb-associated cancer mortality data, together with calculated organ doses from a full-body CT examination, to estimate the radiation risks associated with single and multiple full-body CT examinations. RESULTS: A single full-body CT examination in a 45-year-old adult would result in an estimated lifetime attributable cancer mortality risk of around 0.08%, with the 95% credibility limits being a factor of 3.2 in either direction. A 45-year-old adult who plans to undergo annual full-body CT examinations up to age 75 (30 examinations) would accrue an overall estimated lifetime attributable risk of cancer mortality of about 1.9%, with the 95% credibility limits being a factor of 2 in either direction. CONCLUSION: The authors provide estimates of lifetime cancer mortality risks from both single and annual full-body CT examinations. These risk estimates are needed to assess the utility of full-body CT examinations from both an individual and a public health perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT
Brenner, D. J., Elliston, C. D., Hall, E. J., & Berdon, W. E. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760289 · Cited by 3,222 · cited 1×
“Further methodologic details have been described elsewhere (13).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPreston, D. L., Shimizu, Y., Pierce, D. A., Suyama, A., & Mabuchi, K. (2003) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3049 · Cited by 1,172
Cited by
Pearce, M. S., Salotti, J. A., Little, M. P., McHugh, K., Lee, C., Kim, K. P., Howe, N. L., Ronckers, C. M., Rajaraman, P., Craft, A. W., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60815-0 · Cited by 3,735
Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology
HALL, E. J., & BRENNER, D. J. (2008) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr/01948454 · Cited by 915
Self-citationBates, S. M., Rajasekhar, A., Middeldorp, S., McLintock, C., Rodger, M. A., James, A. H., Vazquez, S. R., Greer, I. A., Riva, J. J., Bhatt, M., et al. (2018) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024802 · Cited by 625
Whole-Body PET/CT Scanning: Estimation of Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk
Huang, B., Law, M. W.-M., & Khong, P.-L. (2009) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2511081300 · Cited by 522
Radiation Exposure from Musculoskeletal Computerized Tomographic Scans
Biswas, D., Bible, J. E., Bohan, M., Simpson, A. K., Whang, P. G., & Grauer, J. N. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.h.01199 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Brenner, D. J., & Elliston, C. D.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 735-738
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2153549888
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimated Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Full-Body CT Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2323031095
- The paper
- Brenner, D. J., & Elliston, C. D. (2004). Estimated Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Full-Body CT Screening. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2323031095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.