The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whole-Body PET/CT Scanning: Estimation of Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk
Abstract
PURPOSE: To estimate the radiation dose from whole-body fluorine 18 ((18)F)-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomographic (PET)/computed tomographic (CT) studies and to evaluate the induced cancer risk to U.S. and Hong Kong populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluorine 18-FDG PET/CT studies obtained by using a 64-detector CT unit and one of three CT protocols were evaluated. CT protocol A consisted of 120 kV; rotation time, 0.5 second; pitch, 0.984; 100-300 mA; and noise level, 20. CT protocol B was the same as A, except for a fixed tube current of 250 mA. CT protocol C consisted of 140 kV; rotation time, 0.5 second; pitch, 0.984; 150-350 mA; and noise level, 3.5. CT doses were measured in a humanoid phantom equipped with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Doses from (18)F-FDG PET scanning were estimated by multiplying the (18)F-FDG radioactivity (370 MBq) with dose coefficients. Effective doses were calculated according to International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103. Lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence was estimated according to the National Academies' Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. RESULTS: Effective doses with protocols A, B, and C, respectively, were 13.45, 24.79, and 31.91 mSv for female patients and 13.65, 24.80, and 32.18 mSv for male patients. The LAR of cancer incidence associated with the dose was higher in the Hong Kong population than in the U.S. population. For 20-year-old U.S. women, LARs of cancer incidence were between 0.231% and 0.514%, and for 20-year-old U.S. men, LARs of cancer incidence were between 0.163% and 0.323%; LARs were 5.5%-20.9% higher for the Hong Kong population. The induced cancer risks decreased when age at exposure increased. CONCLUSION: Whole-body PET/CT scanning is accompanied by substantial radiation dose and cancer risk. Thus, examinations should be clinically justified, and measures should be taken to reduce the dose.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure
Brenner, D. J., & Hall, E. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra072149 · Cited by 8,748
The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection
Valentin, J. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · Cited by 4,105
Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know
Brenner, D. J., Doll, R., Goodhead, D. T., Hall, E. J., Land, C. E., Little, J. B., Lubin, J. H., Preston, D. L., Preston, R. J., Puskin, J. S., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2235592100 · Cited by 1,765
Einstein, A. J., Henzlova, M. J., & Rajagopalan, S. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.3.317 · Cited by 1,410
Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology
Fletcher, J. W., Djulbegovic, B., Soares, H. P., Siegel, B. A., Lowe, V. J., Lyman, G. H., Coleman, R. E., Wahl, R., Paschold, J. C., Avril, N., et al. (2008) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.107.047787 · Cited by 1,101
Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb Survivors
Pierce, D. A., & Preston, D. L. (2000) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0178:rrcral]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 757
Estimated Radiation Risks Potentially Associated with Full-Body CT Screening
Brenner, D. J., & Elliston, C. D. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2323031095 · Cited by 685
X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners
Kinahan, P. E., Hasegawa, B. H., & Beyer, T. (2003) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1053/snuc.2003.127307 · Cited by 515
Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.
Brix, G., Lechel, U., Glatting, G., Ziegler, S. I., Münzing, W., Müller, S. P., & Beyer, T. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 458
Blodgett, T. M., Meltzer, C. C., & Townsend, D. W. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2422051113 · Cited by 387
Cited by
Biomedical Applications of Untethered Mobile Milli/Microrobots
Sitti, M., Ceylan, H., Hu, W., Giltinan, J., Turan, M., Yim, S., & Diller, E. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2385105 · Cited by 893
PET/MRI: Paving the Way for the Next Generation of Clinical Multimodality Imaging Applications
Pichler, B. J., Kolb, A., Nägele, T., & Schlemmer, H.-P. (2010) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.061853 · Cited by 418
Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution
Conti, M. (2011) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1711-y · Cited by 335
Low-count whole-body PET with deep learning in a multicenter and externally validated study
Chaudhari, A. S., Mittra, E., Davidzon, G. A., Gulaka, P., Gandhi, H., Brown, A., Zhang, T., Srinivas, S., Gong, E., Zaharchuk, G., et al. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00497-2 · Cited by 83
Positron emission tomography in multiple sclerosis - straight to the target
Bodini, B., Tonietto, M., Airas, L., & Stankoff, B. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-021-00537-1 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, B., Law, M. W.-M., & Khong, P.-L.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 251
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 166-174
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2108019762
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 16.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whole-Body PET/CT Scanning: Estimation of Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2511081300
- The paper
- Huang, B., Law, M. W.-M., & Khong, P.-L. (2009). Whole-Body PET/CT Scanning: Estimation of Radiation Dose and Cancer Risk. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511081300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.