Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,104

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: US Differentiation—Multicenter Retrospective Study

Open access
Moon, Won-Jin, Jung, So Lyung, Lee, Jeong Hyun, Na, Dong Gyu, Baek, Jung-Hwan, Lee, Young Hen, Kim, Jinna, Kim, Hyun Sook, Byun, Jun Soo, Lee, Dong Hoon·2008·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonographic (US) criteria for the depiction of benign and malignant thyroid nodules by using tissue diagnosis as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study had institutional review board approval, and informed consent was waived. From January 2003 through June 2003, 8024 consecutive patients had undergone thyroid US at nine affiliated hospitals. A total of 831 patients (716 women, 115 men; mean age, 49.5 years +/- 13.8 [standard deviation]) with 849 nodules (360 malignant, 489 benign) that were diagnosed at surgery or biopsy were included in this study. Three radiologists retrospectively evaluated the following characteristics on US images: nodule size, presence of spongiform appearance, shape, margin, echotexture, echogenicity, and presence of microcalcification, macrocalcification, or rim calcification. A chi(2) test and multiple regression analysis were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were obtained. RESULTS: Statistically significant (P < .05) findings of malignancy were a taller-than-wide shape (sensitivity, 40.0%; specificity, 91.4%), a spiculated margin (sensitivity, 48.3%; specificity, 91.8%), marked hypoechogenicity (sensitivity, 41.4%; specificity, 92.2%), microcalcification (sensitivity, 44.2%; specificity, 90.8%), and macrocalcification (sensitivity, 9.7%; specificity, 96.1%). The US findings for benign nodules were isoechogenicity (sensitivity, 56.6%; specificity, 88.1%; P < .001) and a spongiform appearance (sensitivity, 10.4%; specificity, 99.7%; P < .001). The presence of at least one malignant US finding had a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 74.0%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 78.0%. For thyroid nodules with a diameter of 1 cm or less, the sensitivity of microcalcifications was lower than that in larger nodules (36.6% vs 51.4%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Shape, margin, echogenicity, and presence of calcification are helpful criteria for the discrimination of malignant from benign nodules; the diagnostic accuracy of US criteria is dependent on tumor size.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2473070944

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,104

Metadata

Authors
Moon, W.-J., Jung, S. L., Lee, J. H., Na, D. G., Baek, J.-H., Lee, Y. H., Kim, J., Kim, H. S., Byun, J. S., & Lee, D. H.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2008-06
Volume
247
Issue
3
Pages
762-770
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2108736975
Cited by
1,104
References
1
FWCI
29.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: US Differentiation—Multicenter Retrospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.2473070944
The paper
Moon, W.-J., Jung, S. L., Lee, J. H., Na, D. G., Baek, J.-H., Lee, Y. H., Kim, J., Kim, H. S., Byun, J. S., & Lee, D. H. (2008). Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: US Differentiation—Multicenter Retrospective Study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2473070944

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.