Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 785

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements.

Hadlock, F P, Harrist, R B, Carpenter, R J, Deter, R L, Park, S K·1984·Radiology

Abstract

Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in utero was performed in 167 live-born fetuses examined within one week of delivery. Regression models were based on measurements of abdominal circumference, head circumference, biparietal diameter, and femur length, both alone and in combination. The best results (1 S.D. = 7.5% of actual weight) were obtained by combining measurements of the fetal head, abdomen, and femur, most likely due to the strong linear relationship between femur length and crown-heel length.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691115

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 785

Metadata

Authors
Hadlock, F. P., Harrist, R. B., Carpenter, R. J., Deter, R. L., & Park, S. K.
Venue
Radiology
Published
1984-02
Volume
150
Issue
2
Pages
535-540
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2144559357
Cited by
785
References
0
FWCI
9.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691115
The paper
Hadlock, F. P., Harrist, R. B., Carpenter, R. J., Deter, R. L., & Park, S. K. (1984). Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691115

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.