The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes with MR imaging. Part I. Methods, reliability, and validation.
Abstract
A computerized system was developed to process standard spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data for estimation of brain parenchyma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes. In phantom experiments, the estimated volumes corresponded closely to the true volumes (r = .998), with a mean error less than 1.0 cm3 (for phantom volumes ranging from 5 to 35 cm3), with excellent intra- and interobserver reliability. In a clinical validation study with actual brain images of 10 human subjects, the average coefficient of variation between observers for the measurement of absolute brain and CSF volumes was 1.2% and 6.4%, respectively. The intraclass correlations for three expert operators is greater than .99 in the measurement of brain and ventricular volumes and greater than .94 for total CSF volume. Therefore, the authors believe that their technique to analyze MR images of the brain performed with acceptable levels of accuracy and reliability and that it can be used to measure brain and CSF volumes for clinical research. This technique could be helpful in the correlation of neuroanatomic measurements to behavioral and physiologic parameters in neuropsychiatric disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gur, R. C., Turetsky, B. I., Matsui, M., Yan, M., Bilker, W., Hughett, P., & Gur, R. E. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-04065.1999 · Cited by 909
Self-citationStatistical approach to segmentation of single-channel cerebral MR images
Rajapakse, J. C., Giedd, J. N., & Rapoport, J. L. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.563663 · Cited by 678
Gur, R. E., Cowell, P., Turetsky, B. I., Gallacher, F., Cannon, T., Bilker, W., & Gur, R. C. (1998) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.55.2.145 · Cited by 540
Self-citationParametric estimate of intensity inhomogeneities applied to MRI
Styner, M., Brechbuhler, C., Szckely, G., & Gerig, G. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.845174 · Cited by 527
Gender differences in age effect on brain atrophy measured by magnetic resonance imaging.
Gur, R. C., Mozley, P. D., Resnick, S. M., Gottlieb, G. L., Kohn, M., Zimmerman, R., Herman, G., Atlas, S., Grossman, R., & Berretta, D. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.7.2845 · Cited by 447
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohn, M. I., Tanna, N. K., Herman, G. T., Resnick, S. M., Mozley, P. D., Gur, R. E., Alavi, A., Zimmerman, R. A., & Gur, R. C.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-122
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2130520030
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes with MR imaging. Part I. Methods, reliability, and validation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.178.1.1984289
- The paper
- Kohn, M. I., Tanna, N. K., Herman, G. T., Resnick, S. M., Mozley, P. D., Gur, R. E., Alavi, A., Zimmerman, R. A., & Gur, R. C. (1991). Analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes with MR imaging. Part I. Methods, reliability, and validation. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.178.1.1984289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.