The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivities of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5 T with those of percutaneous ultrasound (US), intraoperative US (IOUS), and dynamic computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative assessment of metastatic liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with liver metastases who were candidates for curative surgery underwent presurgical imaging. Thirteen patients underwent surgery and IOUS after undergoing preoperative US, CT, and MR imaging. RESULTS: In the preoperative imaging group, the standard of reference was the total number of lesions detected with any of the modalities. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging was the most sensitive modality (99%). In the surgical group, the standard of reference was the total number of metastases identified at IOUS and pathologic examination. IOUS had the highest sensitivity (80%), followed by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging (56%). CONCLUSION: Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced high-field-strength MR imaging facilitates the preoperative evaluation of potentially curable metastatic liver disease; however, it is inferior to IOUS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huppertz, A., Balzer, T., Blakeborough, A., Breuer, J., Giovagnoni, A., Heinz-Peer, G., Laniado, M., Manfredi, R. M., Mathieu, D. G., Mueller, D., et al. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2301020269 · Cited by 396
Multimodality imaging in nanomedicine and nanotheranostics
Li, X., Li, X., Zhang, X.-N., Li, X.-D., Chang, J., Zhang, X.-N., Li, X.-D., & Chang, J. (2016) · Cancer Biology & Medicine · doi:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0055 · Cited by 126
Present and future of metal nanoparticles in tumor ablation therapy
Lou, W., Xie, L., Xu, L., Xu, M., Xu, F., Zhao, Q., & Jiang, T. (2023) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/d3nr04362b · Cited by 33
Detection of hepatic metastasis: manganese-and ferucarbotran-enhanced MR imaging
Choi, J.-Y., Kim, M.-J., Kim, J. H., Kim, S. H., Ko, H.-K., Lim, J. S., Oh, Y. T., Chung, J.-J., Yoo, H. S., Lee, J. T., et al. (2006) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.06.016 · Cited by 29
Santoro, L., Grazioli, L., Filippone, A., Grassedonio, E., Belli, G., & Colagrande, S. (2009) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21937 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Hagspiel, K. D., Neidl, K. F., Eichenberger, A. C., Weder, W., & Marincek, B.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 471-478
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2015607636
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617863
- The paper
- Hagspiel, K. D., Neidl, K. F., Eichenberger, A. C., Weder, W., & Marincek, B. (1995). Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617863
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
