The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the detection of focal liver lesions with respect to dose, side effects, and pulse sequence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized double-blinded trial was performed in 33 patients with focal solid liver lesions. A bolus of Gd-EOB-DTPA, a liver-specific contrast agent, was intravenously administered at three different doses (12.5, 25, and 50 mumol per kilogram of body weight). Magnetic resonance imaging with different T1-weighted techniques was performed 20 and 45 minutes after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Changes in liver signal intensity, lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ration (C/N), detectable liver lesions, side effects, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: Gd-EOB-DTPA significantly (P < .05) increased liver signal intensity and lesion-liver C/N within the dose range tested. Lesion detection was improved 20 and 45 minutes after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. A dose of 12.5 mumol was sufficient for the detection of focal liver lesions, and the breath-hold, T1-weighted, fast low-angle shot pulse sequence was the most useful. No significant changes in vital signs, clinical laboratory test results, and urinalysis were observed. CONCLUSION: Gd-EOB-DTPA is an efficient, diagnostically useful, and safe contrast agent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Villaraza, A. J. L., Bumb, A., & Brechbiel, M. W. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900232t · Cited by 632
Huppertz, A., Balzer, T., Blakeborough, A., Breuer, J., Giovagnoni, A., Heinz-Peer, G., Laniado, M., Manfredi, R. M., Mathieu, D. G., Mueller, D., et al. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2301020269 · Cited by 396
Self-citationLiver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging
Thian, Y. L., Riddell, A. M., & Koh, D.-M. (2013) · Cancer Imaging · doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0050 · Cited by 64
Gadoxetate acid-enhanced MR imaging for HCC: A review for clinicians
Chanyaputhipong, J., Low, S.-C. A., & Chow, P. K. H. (2011) · International Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.4061/2011/489342 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Reimer, P., Rummeny, E. J., Shamsi, K., Balzer, T., Daldrup, H. E., Tombach, B., Hesse, T., Berns, T., & Peters, P. E.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 177-183
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2058174138
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633143
- The paper
- Reimer, P., Rummeny, E. J., Shamsi, K., Balzer, T., Daldrup, H. E., Tombach, B., Hesse, T., Berns, T., & Peters, P. E. (1996). Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.199.1.8633143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.