The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the appearance of various breast lesions on elastograms and to explore the potential of elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 46 breast lesions were examined with elastography. Patients underwent biopsy or aspiration of all lesions, revealing 15 fibroadenomas, 12 carcinomas, six fibrocystic nodules, and 13 other lesions. The elastogram was generated from radio-frequency data collected with use of a 5-MHz linear-array transducer. The elastogram and corresponding sonogram were evaluated by a single observer for lesion visualization, relative brightness, and margin definition and regularity. The sizes of the lesions at each imaging examination and at biopsy were recorded and compared. RESULTS: Softer tissues such as fat appear as bright areas on elastograms. Firm tissues, including parenchyma, cancers, and other masses, appear darker. The cancers were statistically significantly darker than fibroadenomas (P < .005) and substantially larger on the elastogram than on the sonogram. Seventy-three percent of fibroadenomas and 56% of solid benign lesions could be distinguished from cancers by using lesion brightness and size difference. Some cancers that appeared as areas of shadowing on sonograms appeared as discrete masses on elastograms. CONCLUSION: Elastography has the potential to be useful in the evaluation of areas of shadowing on the sonogram. It also may be helpful in the distinction of benign from malignant masses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Breast Disease: Clinical Application of US Elastography for Diagnosis
Itoh, A., Ueno, E., Tohno, E., Kamma, H., Takahashi, H., Shiina, T., Yamakawa, M., & Matsumura, T. (2006) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2391041676 · Cited by 1,640
Tanter, M., Bercoff, J., Athanasiou, A., Deffieux, T., Gennisson, J.-L., Montaldo, G., Muller, M., Tardivon, A., & Fink, M. (2008) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.02.002 · Cited by 733
Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity
Wells, P. N. T., & Liang, H.-D. (2011) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0054 · Cited by 538
High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection
Sinkus, R., Lorenzen, J., Schrader, D., Lorenzen, M., Dargatz, M., & Holz, D. (2000) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/45/6/317 · Cited by 481
Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective
Parker, K. J., Doyley, M. M., & Rubens, D. J. (2011) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/56/1/r01 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Garra, B. S., Cespedes, E. I., Ophir, J., Spratt, S. R., Zuurbier, R. A., Magnant, C. M., & Pennanen, M. F.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-86
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2157238234
- Cited by
- 940
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988195
- The paper
- Garra, B. S., Cespedes, E. I., Ophir, J., Spratt, S. R., Zuurbier, R. A., Magnant, C. M., & Pennanen, M. F. (1997). Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.