The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Airway obstruction in asthmatic and healthy individuals: inspiratory and expiratory thin-section CT findings.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine differences in computed tomographic (CT) findings in asthmatic and healthy individuals and to correlate the findings with severity of airway obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine asthmatic patients and 14 healthy subjects were prospectively evaluated with thin-section CT. Inspiratory CT scans were subjectively evaluated for presence of bronchial wall thickening, bronchial dilatation, and mosaic lung attenuation; expiratory scans were subjectively evaluated for presence of air trapping. Objective measurement of bronchoarterial-diameter ratio was performed on inspiratory scans. CT findings were compared with pulmonary function test results. RESULTS: Bronchial wall thickening, severe air trapping, and reduced bronchoarterial-diameter ratio were observed more commonly in asthmatic patients than in healthy subjects. Bronchial wall thickening was more prevalent among patients with severe airflow obstruction (10 of 12 readings [83%]) than in patients with normal airflow (15 of 40 readings [38%]) or mild obstruction (nine of 26 readings [35%]). Other subjectively determined CT findings did not correlate with pulmonary function test results. The mean bronchoarterial-diameter ratios +/- 1 standard deviation were 0.65 +/- 0.16 in healthy subjects and 0.60 +/- 0.16, 0.60 +/- 0.18, and 0.48 +/- 0.11 in patients with normal airflow and mild and severe obstruction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thin-section CT is of limited value in distinguishing asthmatic patients with normal airflow or mild airflow obstruction from healthy subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Asthma: From Bronchoconstriction to Airways Inflammation and Remodeling
BOUSQUET, J., JEFFERY, P. K., BUSSE, W. W., JOHNSON, M., & VIGNOLA, A. M. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9903102 · Cited by 1,702
Hyperpolarized 3He MR lung ventilation imaging in asthmatics: Preliminary findings
Altes, T. A., Powers, P. L., Knight‐Scott, J., Rakes, G., Platts‐Mills, T. A. E., de Lange, E. E., Alford, B. A., Mugler, J. P., & Brookeman, J. R. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1054 · Cited by 318
Computed tomographic imaging of the airways: relationship to structure and function
de Jong, P. A., Müller, N. L., Paré, P. D., & Coxson, H. O. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00007105 · Cited by 171
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, C. S., Müller, N. L., Worthy, S. A., Kim, J. S., Awadh, N., & Fitzgerald, M.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 361-367
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2085650150
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Airway obstruction in asthmatic and healthy individuals: inspiratory and expiratory thin-section CT findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114089
- The paper
- Park, C. S., Müller, N. L., Worthy, S. A., Kim, J. S., Awadh, N., & Fitzgerald, M. (1997). Airway obstruction in asthmatic and healthy individuals: inspiratory and expiratory thin-section CT findings. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.