The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of bone marrow for differentiating between benign and pathologic vertebral compression fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with 39 vertebral compression fractures were examined with MR imaging. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging was performed with a steady-state free precession sequence in 22 acute benign osteoporotic and/or traumatic fractures and 17 pathologic compression fractures. Biplanar radiographs, T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) MR images, and short inversion time inversion-recovery (STIR) MR images were available for all patients. The signal intensity characteristics were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively (bone marrow contrast ratios and signal-to-noise ratios) for all sequences. RESULTS: At diffusion-weighted MR imaging, all benign vertebral compression fractures were hypo- to isointense to adjacent normal vertebral bodies. Pathologic compression fractures were hyperintense to normal vertebral bodies. Benign vertebral fractures had negative bone marrow contrast ratios at diffusion-weighted imaging, whereas pathologic vertebral fractures had positive values (P < .001). The difference in bone marrow contrast ratios for benign and pathologic compression fractures at T1-weighted SE and STIR imaging was not significant (P > .01). CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging provided excellent distinction between pathologic and benign vertebral compression fractures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications
Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J., Poupon, C., Clark, C. A., Pappata, S., Molko, N., & Chabriat, H. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1076 · Cited by 3,547
Nia, H. T., Munn, L. L., & Jain, R. K. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz0868 · Cited by 855
Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging
Bammer, R. (2003) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00303-0 · Cited by 851
Head and Neck Lesions: Characterization with Diffusion-weighted Echo-planar MR Imaging
Wang, J., Takashima, S., Takayama, F., Kawakami, S., Saito, A., Matsushita, T., Momose, M., & Ishiyama, T. (2001) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2202010063 · Cited by 566
Clinical intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion MR imaging: Past, present, and future
Iima, M., & Le Bihan, D. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150244 · Cited by 498
Metadata
- Authors
- Baur, A., Stäbler, A., Brüning, R., Bartl, R., Krödel, A., Reiser, M., & Deimling, M.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 207
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 349-356
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2029945956
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577479
- The paper
- Baur, A., Stäbler, A., Brüning, R., Bartl, R., Krödel, A., Reiser, M., & Deimling, M. (1998). Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577479
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.