The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features that best enable discrimination between malignant and benign ovarian masses and develop a scoring system for accurate diagnosis with these features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features of 211 adnexal masses were correlated with the final diagnosis; the most discriminating features for malignancy were selected with stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty-eight masses were malignant and 183 benign. All masses with a markedly hyperechoic solid component or no solid component were benign. For masses with a nonhyperechoic solid component, additional features that allowed statistically significant discrimination of benignity from malignancy were, in decreasing order of importance, (a) location of flow at conventional color Doppler imaging, (b) amount of free intraperitoneal fluid, and (c) presence and thickness of septations. A scoring formula that made use of values based on the logistic regression equation had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98 +/- 0.01. The cutoff score with the highest accuracy had a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 93%. CONCLUSION: A solid component is the most statistically significant predictor of a malignant ovarian mass. A multiparameter scoring system that uses three gray-scale and one Doppler feature, developed by means of stepwise logistic regression, has high sensitivity and specificity for predicting malignancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Complex Adnexal Masses: Detection and Characterization with MR Imaging—Multivariate Analysis
Hricak, H., Chen, M., Coakley, F. V., Kinkel, K., Yu, K. K., Sica, G., Bacchetti, P., & Powell, C. B. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja3939 · Cited by 294
Kinkel, K., Lu, Y., Mehdizade, A., Pelte, M.-F., & Hricak, H. (2005) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2361041618 · Cited by 280
MRI, CT, and PET/CT for Ovarian Cancer Detection and Adnexal Lesion Characterization
Iyer, V. R., & Lee, S. I. (2010) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.09.3522 · Cited by 263
Deep Learning Prediction of Ovarian Malignancy at US Compared with O-RADS and Expert Assessment
Chen, H., Yang, B.-W., Qian, L., Meng, Y.-S., Bai, X.-H., Hong, X.-W., He, X., Jiang, M.-J., Yuan, F., Du, Q.-W., et al. (2022) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.211367 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, D. L., Doubilet, P. M., Miller, F. H., Frates, M. C., Laing, F. C., DiSalvo, D. N., Benson, C. B., & Lerner, M. H.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 208
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-110
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2138868580
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646799
- The paper
- Brown, D. L., Doubilet, P. M., Miller, F. H., Frates, M. C., Laing, F. C., DiSalvo, D. N., Benson, C. B., & Lerner, M. H. (1998). Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.