The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperacute Stroke: Simultaneous Measurement of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume, Relative Cerebral Blood Flow, and Mean Tissue Transit Time
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate additional information provided by maps of relative cerebral blood flow in functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of human hyperacute cerebral ischemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion-weighted and hemodynamic MR imaging were performed in 23 patients less than 12 hours after the onset of symptoms. Maps of relative cerebral blood flow and tracer mean tissue transit time were computed, as were maps of apparent diffusion and relative cerebral blood volume. Acute lesion volumes on the maps were compared with follow-up imaging findings. RESULTS: In 15 of 23 subjects (65%), blood flow maps revealed hemodynamic abnormalities not visible on blood volume maps. A mismatch between initial blood flow and diffusion findings predicted growth of infarct more often (12 of 15 subjects with infarcts that grew) than did a mismatch between initial blood volume and diffusion findings (eight of 15). However, lesion volumes on blood volume and diffusion maps correlated better with eventual infarct volumes (r > 0.90) than did those on blood flow and tracer mean transit time maps (r approximately 0.6), likely as a result of threshold effects. In eight patients, blood volume was elevated around the diffusion abnormality, suggesting a compensatory hemodynamic response. CONCLUSION: MR imaging can delineate areas of altered blood flow, blood volume, and water mobility in hyperacute human stroke. Predictive models of tissue outcome may benefit by including computation of both relative cerebral blood flow and blood volume.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke
Warach, S., Chien, D., Li, W., Ronthal, M., & Edelman, R. R. (1992) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.42.9.1717 · Cited by 881
Cited by
Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI.
Le Bihan, D. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1119 · Cited by 1,571
Spreading Depression, Spreading Depolarizations, and the Cerebral Vasculature
Ayata, C., & Lauritzen, M. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00027.2014 · Cited by 555
Diffusion MRI at 25: exploring brain tissue structure and function
Le Bihan, D., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.006 · Cited by 498
Methodology of brain perfusion imaging
Barbier, E. L., Lamalle, L., & Décorps, M. (2001) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.1073 · Cited by 404
Law, M., Saindane, A. M., Ge, Y., Babb, J. S., Johnson, G., Mannon, L. J., Herbert, J., & Grossman, R. I. (2004) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2313030996 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Sorensen, A. G., Copen, W. A., Østergaard, L., Buonanno, F. S., Gonzalez, R. G., Rordorf, G., Rosen, B. R., Schwamm, L. H., Weisskoff, R. M., & Koroshetz, W. J.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 210
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 519-527
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2140327468
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperacute Stroke: Simultaneous Measurement of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume, Relative Cerebral Blood Flow, and Mean Tissue Transit Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99fe06519
- The paper
- Sorensen, A. G., Copen, W. A., Østergaard, L., Buonanno, F. S., Gonzalez, R. G., Rordorf, G., Rosen, B. R., Schwamm, L. H., Weisskoff, R. M., & Koroshetz, W. J. (1999). Hyperacute Stroke: Simultaneous Measurement of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume, Relative Cerebral Blood Flow, and Mean Tissue Transit Time. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99fe06519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.