Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 327

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

MR-Intracranial Pressure (ICP): A Method to Measure Intracranial Elastance and Pressure Noninvasively by Means of MR Imaging: Baboon and Human Study

Alperin, Noam J., Lee, Sang H., Loth, Francis, Raksin, Patricia B., Lichtor, Terry·2000·Radiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a noninvasive method for intracranial elastance and intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intracranial volume and pressure changes were calculated from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging measurements of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood flow. The volume change was calculated from the net transcranial CSF and blood volumetric flow rates. The change in pressure was derived from the change in the CSF pressure gradient calculated from CSF velocity. An elastance index was derived from the ratio of pressure to volume change. The reproducibility of the elastance index measurement was established from four to five measurements in five healthy volunteers. The elastance index was measured and compared with invasive ICP measurements in five patients with an intraventricular catheter at MR imaging. False-positive and false-negative rates were established by using 25 measurements in eight healthy volunteers and six in four patients with chronically elevated ICP. RESULTS: The mean of the fractional SD of the elastance index in humans was 19.6%. The elastance index in the five patients with intraventricular catheters correlated well with the invasively measured ICP (R:(2) = 0.965; P: <.005). MR imaging-derived ICPs in the eight healthy volunteers were 4.2-12.4 mm Hg, all within normal range. Measurements in three of the four patients with chronically elevated ICP were 20.5-34.0 mm Hg, substantially higher than the normal limit. CONCLUSION: MR imaging-derived elastance index correlates with ICP over a wide range of ICP values. The sensitivity of the technique allows differentiation between normal and elevated ICP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc42877

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 327

Metadata

Authors
Alperin, N. J., Lee, S. H., Loth, F., Raksin, P. B., & Lichtor, T.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2000-12
Volume
217
Issue
3
Pages
877-885
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W2061102313
Cited by
327
References
0
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MR-Intracranial Pressure (ICP): A Method to Measure Intracranial Elastance and Pressure Noninvasively by Means of MR Imaging: Baboon and Human Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc42877
The paper
Alperin, N. J., Lee, S. H., Loth, F., Raksin, P. B., & Lichtor, T. (2000). MR-Intracranial Pressure (ICP): A Method to Measure Intracranial Elastance and Pressure Noninvasively by Means of MR Imaging: Baboon and Human Study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc42877

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.