The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MR-Intracranial Pressure (ICP): A Method to Measure Intracranial Elastance and Pressure Noninvasively by Means of MR Imaging: Baboon and Human Study
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a noninvasive method for intracranial elastance and intracranial pressure (ICP) measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intracranial volume and pressure changes were calculated from magnetic resonance (MR) imaging measurements of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood flow. The volume change was calculated from the net transcranial CSF and blood volumetric flow rates. The change in pressure was derived from the change in the CSF pressure gradient calculated from CSF velocity. An elastance index was derived from the ratio of pressure to volume change. The reproducibility of the elastance index measurement was established from four to five measurements in five healthy volunteers. The elastance index was measured and compared with invasive ICP measurements in five patients with an intraventricular catheter at MR imaging. False-positive and false-negative rates were established by using 25 measurements in eight healthy volunteers and six in four patients with chronically elevated ICP. RESULTS: The mean of the fractional SD of the elastance index in humans was 19.6%. The elastance index in the five patients with intraventricular catheters correlated well with the invasively measured ICP (R:(2) = 0.965; P: <.005). MR imaging-derived ICPs in the eight healthy volunteers were 4.2-12.4 mm Hg, all within normal range. Measurements in three of the four patients with chronically elevated ICP were 20.5-34.0 mm Hg, substantially higher than the normal limit. CONCLUSION: MR imaging-derived elastance index correlates with ICP over a wide range of ICP values. The sensitivity of the technique allows differentiation between normal and elevated ICP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiology and treatment of cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury
Jha, R. M., Kochanek, P. M., & Simard, J. M. (2019) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.08.004 · Cited by 481
The pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial pulsatility
Wagshul, M. E., Eide, P. K., & Madsen, J. R. (2011) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/2045-8118-8-5 · Cited by 473
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Invasive versus Non-Invasive Methods—A Review
Raboel, P. H., Bartek, J., Andresen, M., Bellander, B. M., & Romner, B. (2012) · Critical Care Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2012/950393 · Cited by 416
Interstitial solute transport in 3D reconstructed neuropil occurs by diffusion rather than bulk flow
Holter, K. E., Kehlet, B., Devor, A., Sejnowski, T. J., Dale, A. M., Omholt, S. W., Ottersen, O. P., Nagelhus, E. A., Mardal, K.-A., & Pettersen, K. H. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1706942114 · Cited by 282
Eide, P. K., & Sorteberg, W. (2010) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000363408.69856.b8 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Alperin, N. J., Lee, S. H., Loth, F., Raksin, P. B., & Lichtor, T.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 217
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 877-885
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2061102313
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MR-Intracranial Pressure (ICP): A Method to Measure Intracranial Elastance and Pressure Noninvasively by Means of MR Imaging: Baboon and Human Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc42877
- The paper
- Alperin, N. J., Lee, S. H., Loth, F., Raksin, P. B., & Lichtor, T. (2000). MR-Intracranial Pressure (ICP): A Method to Measure Intracranial Elastance and Pressure Noninvasively by Means of MR Imaging: Baboon and Human Study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.217.3.r00dc42877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.