The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming Artifacts from Metallic Orthopedic Implants at High-Field-Strength MR Imaging and Multi-detector CT
Open accessAbstract
At magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and multidetector computed tomography (CT), artifacts arising from metallic orthopedic hardware are an obstacle to obtaining optimal images. Although various techniques for reducing such artifacts have been developed and corroborated by previous researchers, a new era of more powerful MR imaging and multidetector CT modalities has renewed the importance of a systematic consideration of methods for artifact reduction. Knowledge of the factors that contribute to artifacts, of related theories, and of artifact reduction techniques has become mandatory for radiologists. Factors that affect artifacts on MR images include the composition of the metallic hardware, the orientation of the hardware in relation to the direction of the main magnetic field, the strength of the magnetic field, the pulse sequence type, and other MR imaging parameters (mainly voxel size, which is determined by the field of view, image matrix, section thickness, and echo train length). At multidetector CT, the factors that affect artifacts include the composition of the hardware, orientation of the hardware, acquisition parameters (peak voltage, tube charge, collimation, and acquired section thickness), and reconstruction parameters (reconstructed section thickness, reconstruction algorithm used, and whether an extended CT scale was used). A comparison of images obtained with different hardware and different acquisition and reconstruction parameters facilitates an understanding of methods for reducing or overcoming artifacts related to metallic implants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artifacts in CT: Recognition and Avoidance
Barrett, J. F., & Keat, N. (2004) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.246045065 · Cited by 1,688
Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging
Lüdeke, K. M., Röschmann, P., & Tischler, R. (1985) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/0730-725x(85)90397-2 · Cited by 445
Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty: MR Imaging—Initial Experience
White, L. M., Kim, J. K., Mehta, M., Merchant, N., Schweitzer, M. E., Morrison, W. B., Hutchison, C. R., & Gross, A. E. (2000) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap11254 · Cited by 226
Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
Suh, J. S., Jeong, E. K., Shin, K. H., Cho, J. H., Na, J. B., Kim, D. H., & Han, C. D. (1998) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.171.5.9798849 · Cited by 183
Self-citationReduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient‐echo imaging
Cho, Z. H., & Ro, Y. M. (1992) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910230120 · Cited by 165
Yazdi, M., Gingras, L., & Beaulieu, L. (2005) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.02.052 · Cited by 142
Fast iterative algorithm for metal artifact reduction in X-ray CT
Wang, G., Frei, T., & Vannier, M. W. (2000) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/s1076-6332(00)80576-0 · Cited by 127
CT of Metal Implants: Reduction of Artifacts Using an Extended CT Scale Technique
Link, T. M., Berning, W., Scherf, S., Joosten, U., Joist, A., Engelke, K., & Daldrup-Link, H. E. (2000) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-200001000-00029 · Cited by 121
Improved MR imaging for patients with metallic implants☆
Viano, A. M., Gronemeyer, S. A., Haliloğlu, M., & Hoffer, F. A. (2000) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/s0730-725x(99)00135-6 · Cited by 109
CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition
Haramati, N., Staron, R. B., Mazel-Sperling, K., Freeman, K. D., Nickoloff, E. L., Barax, C. N., & Feldman, F. (1994) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/0895-6111(94)90080-9 · Cited by 107
Cited by
Dual-Energy CT for the Musculoskeletal System
Mallinson, P. I., Coupal, T. M., McLaughlin, P. D., Nicolaou, S., Munk, P. L., & Ouellette, H. A. (2016) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2016151109 · Cited by 242
Mehranian, A., Arabi, H., & Zaidi, H. (2016) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.4941014 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, M.-J., Kim, S., Lee, S.-A., Song, H.-T., Huh, Y.-M., Kim, D.-H., Han, S. H., & Suh, J.-S.
- Venue
- RadioGraphics
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 791-803
- ISSN
- 0271-5333 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1323
- OpenAlex
- W2136789364
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming Artifacts from Metallic Orthopedic Implants at High-Field-Strength MR Imaging and Multi-detector CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/rg.273065087
- The paper
- Lee, M.-J., Kim, S., Lee, S.-A., Song, H.-T., Huh, Y.-M., Kim, D.-H., Han, S. H., & Suh, J.-S. (2007). Overcoming Artifacts from Metallic Orthopedic Implants at High-Field-Strength MR Imaging and Multi-detector CT. RadioGraphics. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.273065087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.