Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determination of the Lithium Ion Diffusion Coefficient in Graphite

Open access
Yu, Ping, Popov, B. N., Ritter, J. A., White, R. E.·1999·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

A complex impedance model for spherical particles was used to determine the lithium ion diffusion coefficient in graphite as a function of the state of charge (SOC) and temperature. The values obtained range from of to at 25°C for 0 and 30% SOC, respectively, and for 0% SOC, the value at 55°C was . The conventional potentiostatic intermittent titration technique (PITT) and Waburg impedance approaches were also evaluated, and the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques were exposed. © 1999 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.1391556

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Yu, P., Popov, B. N., Ritter, J. A., & White, R. E.
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
146
Issue
1
Pages
8-14
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
OpenAlex
W2014685797
Cited by
386
References
0
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of the Lithium Ion Diffusion Coefficient in Graphite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1391556
The paper
Yu, P., Popov, B. N., Ritter, J. A., & White, R. E. (1999). Determination of the Lithium Ion Diffusion Coefficient in Graphite. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1391556

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.