The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium Diffusion in Graphitic Carbon
Open accessAbstract
Graphitic carbon is currently considered the state-of-the-art material for the negative electrode in lithium ion cells, mainly due to its high reversibility and low operating potential. However, carbon anodes exhibit mediocre charge/discharge rate performance, which contributes to severe transport-induced surface structural damage upon prolonged cycling and limits the lifetime of the cell. Lithium bulk diffusion in graphitic carbon is not yet completely understood, partly due to the complexity of measuring bulk transport properties in finite-sized nonisotropic particles. To solve this problem for graphite, we use the Devanathan−Stachurski electrochemical methodology combined with ab initio computations to deconvolute and quantify the mechanism of lithium ion diffusion in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG). The results reveal inherent high lithium ion diffusivity in the direction parallel to the graphene plane (∼10 −7 −10 −6 cm 2 s −1 ), as compared to sluggish lithium ion transport along grain boundaries (∼10 −11 cm 2 s −1 ), indicating the possibility of rational design of carbonaceous materials and composite electrodes with very high rate capability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Cited by
Lithium-ion battery fast charging: A review
Tomaszewska, A., Chu, Z., Feng, X., O'Kane, S., Liu, X., Chen, J., Ji, C., Endler, E., Li, R., Liu, L., et al. (2019) · eTransportation · doi:10.1016/j.etran.2019.100011 · Cited by 1,592
Li plating as unwanted side reaction in commercial Li-ion cells – A review
Waldmann, T., Hogg, B.-I., & Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.063 · Cited by 895
Identifying the components of the solid–electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries
Wang, L., Menakath, A., Han, F., Wang, Y., Zavalij, P. Y., Gaskell, K. J., Borodin, O., Iuga, D., Brown, S. P., Wang, C., et al. (2019) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-019-0304-z · Cited by 514
Lithium Plating Mechanism, Detection, and Mitigation in Lithium-Ion Batteries
Lin, X., Khosravinia, K., Hu, X., Li, J., & Lu, W. (2021) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2021.100953 · Cited by 490
Kim, N., Chae, S., Ma, J., Ko, M., & Cho, J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00973-y · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Persson, K., Sethuraman, V. A., Hardwick, L. J., Hinuma, Y., Meng, Y. S., van der Ven, A., Srinivasan, V., Kostecki, R., & Ceder, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-03-22
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1176-1180
- ISSN
- 1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114801198
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium Diffusion in Graphitic Carbon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jz100188d
- The paper
- Persson, K., Sethuraman, V. A., Hardwick, L. J., Hinuma, Y., Meng, Y. S., van der Ven, A., Srinivasan, V., Kostecki, R., & Ceder, G. (2010). Lithium Diffusion in Graphitic Carbon. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz100188d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
