The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accelerating Rate Calorimetry Study on the Thermal Stability of Lithium Intercalated Graphite in Electrolyte. I. Experimental
Open accessAbstract
An accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC) was used to measure the thermal stability of a lithiated mesocarbon microbead (MCMB) material in electrolyte under adiabatic conditions. Measurements were carried out to determine the effects of the lithium content and surface area of the electrode as well as the effects of the electrolyte type and the initial heating temperature on thermal stability. MCMB electrodes with both high and low surface area were reacted electrochemically to three compositions: , , and in ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate (EC:DEC) (33:67) electrolyte. The low‐surface‐area MCMB samples were also lithiated in EC:DEC (50:50) and EC:DEC (50:50) electrolytes The results showed that self‐heating of the MCMB samples depends on ( i ) the initial lithium content of the material; ( ii ) the electrolyte used; ( iii ) the surface area, and ( iv ) the initial heating temperature of the sample. Measurable self‐heating in the EC:DEC (33:67) samples was detected at 80°C, at 70°C for MCMB in EC:DEC (1:1), and at 50°C for MCMB in EC:DEC (1:1). The initial self‐heating rate for samples containing EC:DEC (33:67) electrolyte could be fit by an Arrhenius relation with an activation energy of 1.4 eV. The initial form of the self‐heating rate profile was a result of the conversion of metastable solid electrolyte interface (SEI) components to stable SEI components. © 1999 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles
Lu, L., Han, X., Li, J., Hua, J., & Ouyang, M. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.060 · Cited by 4,837
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
Challenges Facing Lithium Batteries and Electrical Double‐Layer Capacitors
Choi, N., Chen, Z., Freunberger, S. A., Ji, X., Sun, Y., Amine, K., Yushin, G., Nazar, L. F., Cho, J., & Bruce, P. G. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201201429 · Cited by 2,700
A review of lithium-ion battery safety concerns: The issues, strategies, and testing standards
Chen, Y., Kang, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, L., Liu, J., Li, Y., Liang, Z., He, X., Li, X., Tavajohi, N., et al. (2021) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.017 · Cited by 2,178
An, S. J., Li, J., Daniel, C., Mohanty, D., Nagpure, S., & Wood, D. L. (2016) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.008 · Cited by 2,121
Metadata
- Authors
- Richard, M. N., & Dahn, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2068-2077
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2079887321
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accelerating Rate Calorimetry Study on the Thermal Stability of Lithium Intercalated Graphite in Electrolyte. I. Experimental. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.1391893
- The paper
- Richard, M. N., & Dahn, J. R. (1999). Accelerating Rate Calorimetry Study on the Thermal Stability of Lithium Intercalated Graphite in Electrolyte. I. Experimental. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1391893
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.