Cited by 53Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsMembrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Transport Phenomena in Polymer Electrolyte Membranes

Open access
Fimrite, J., Carnes, B., Struchtrup, H., Djilali, N.·2005·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

The insight gained from the analysis conducted in Part I ͑see the preceding article͒ is used in the development of a general transport model for water and protons in perfluorosulfonic acid membranes based on the binary friction model.As a tool for investigating the unknown parameters in the general membrane transport model, a simplified conductivity model is derived to represent conditions found in alternating current ͑ac͒ impedance conductivity measurements.This binary friction conductivity model ͑BFCM͒ is applied to 1100 equivalent weight ͑EW͒ Nafion, and compared to other established membrane models.It is shown to provide a more consistent fit to the data over the entire range of water contents and at different temperatures.The subset of transport coefficients in the BFCM is the same as in the general binary friction membrane model ͑BFM2͒, and thus with additional data on water transport, the BFM2 model and all its required parameters can be fully specified.The paper discusses possible experimental investigations and fundamental simulations to determine the model parameters required to apply the general BFM2 to predict coupled proton and water transport in PEM fuel cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/1.1952647

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Djilali group criticised features of the dusty fluid model combining hydraulic and diffusive transport, as developed by Thampan et al., as being physically unreasonable for the PEMFC context.

    “The works of the Djilali group have criticised features of the “dusty fluid” model combining hydraulic and diffusive transport, as developed by Thampan et al. [30], as being physically unreasonable for the PEMFC context [77,82].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fimrite, J., Carnes, B., Struchtrup, H., & Djilali, N.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2005
Volume
152
Issue
9
Pages
A1815
ISSN
0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1597728252
Cited by
53
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Mitacs
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
polymer electrolyte membranes, proton transport, water transport, perfluorosulfonic acid membranes, Nafion, membrane transport models, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, transport properties, moisture content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review