The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Influence of Attached Bubbles on Potential Drop and Current Distribution at Gas‐Evolving Electrodes
Open accessAbstract
A theoretical study is presented of the effects of bubbles attached to the surface of a gas‐evolving electrode, with emphasis on their influence on the local current distribution and on the potential drop at the electrode. The mathematical model accounts for the combined influence of ( i ) ohmic obstruction within the electrolyte, ( ii ) area masking on the electrode surface, which raises surface overpotential by increasing the effective current density, and ( iii ) decreased local supersaturation, which lowers the concentration overpotential. The electrolytic transport is described by potential theory, and the dissolved gas is assumed to obey steady‐state diffusion within a concentration boundary layer. The coupled field equations are solved numerically using the boundary‐element method. The model is applied to hydrogen evolution in potassium‐hydroxide solution. For gas evolution in the Tafel kinetic regime, the current distribution is nearly uniform over the unmasked electrode area, and the increase in surface overpotential is the dominant voltage effect. However, outside the Tafel regime ( e.g. on cathodes of greater catalytic activity) the current density is strongly enhanced near the bubble‐contact zone, and the supersaturation‐lowering effect is quite strong, largely offsetting the ohmic and surface‐overpotential effects. Proceeding from a set of base conditions, we perform a systematic examination of attached‐bubble effects, their relative importance, and their dependence on system variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The intensification technologies to water electrolysis for hydrogen production – A review
Wang, M., Wang, Z., Gong, X., & Guo, Z. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.090 · Cited by 1,011
Influence of Bubbles on the Energy Conversion Efficiency of Electrochemical Reactors
Angulo, A., van der Linde, P., Gardeniers, H., Modestino, M., & Fernández Rivas, D. (2020) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.005 · Cited by 958
The bubble coverage of gas-evolving electrodes in stagnant electrolytes
Vogt, H., & Balzer, R. J. (2005) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2004.09.025 · Cited by 469
Gas Bubbles in Electrochemical Gas Evolution Reactions
Zhao, X., Ren, H., & Luo, L. (2019) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00119 · Cited by 457
A Perspective on Low-Temperature Water Electrolysis – Challenges in Alkaline and Acidic Technology
Schalenbach, M., Zeradjanin, A. R., Kasian, O., Cherevko, S., & Mayrhofer, K. J. J. (2018) · International Journal of Electrochemical Science · doi:10.20964/2018.02.26 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Dukovic, J., & Tobias, C. W.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 1987-02-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331-343
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2004841009
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Attached Bubbles on Potential Drop and Current Distribution at Gas‐Evolving Electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/1.2100456
- The paper
- Dukovic, J., & Tobias, C. W. (1987). The Influence of Attached Bubbles on Potential Drop and Current Distribution at Gas‐Evolving Electrodes. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2100456
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.