The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OER Catalyst Stability Investigation Using RDE Technique: A Stability Measure or an Artifact?
Open accessAbstract
The rotating disk electrode (RDE) technique was frequently used for investigating the stability of oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts under galvanostatic conditions, where the increase in potential is reported to be due to catalyst degradation. The galvanostatic RDE stability test typically results in catalyst life-time of several hours, although the same catalyst can last for thousands of hours in a PEM electrolyzer under similar conditions, a discrepancy that is still unresolved. In this work, we present a careful examination of the use of the RDE technique as a tool for the investigation of the OER catalyst stability. Our findings provide a clear evidence that the change in potential during the stability test is not related at all to catalyst degradation, but is rather due to an experimental artifact caused by nano- and micro-bubbles formed within the pores of the catalyst layer during the OER, which cannot be removed by electrode rotation. Instead, they accumulate and shield the OER active sites from the electrolyte, resulting in an increase of the potential, which is mistakenly interpreted as catalyst degradation in previous literature. Thus, reliable OER catalyst stability tests other than testing in a real electrolyzer cell still needs to be designed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Benchmarking Heterogeneous Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction
McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Peters, J. C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja407115p · Cited by 7,026
Wang, L., Song, F., Ozouf, G., Geiger, D., Morawietz, T., Handl, M., Gazdzicki, P., Beauger, C., Kaiser, U., Hiesgen, R., et al. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta00679a · Cited by 66
Cited by
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
Chen, F.-Y., Wu, Z.-Y., Adler, Z., & Wang, H. (2021) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.005 · Cited by 1,284
Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Environment: Material Challenges and Solutions
Xie, X., Du, L., Yan, L., Park, S., Qiu, Y., Sokolowski, J., Wang, W., & Shao, Y. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202110036 · Cited by 792
Sun, H., Xu, X., Kim, H., Jung, W., Zhou, W., & Shao, Z. (2023) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12441 · Cited by 601
Shi, Z., Li, J., Wang, Y., Liu, S., Zhu, J., Yang, J., Wang, X., Ni, J., Jiang, Z., Zhang, L., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36380-9 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- El-Sayed, H. A., Weiß, A., Olbrich, L. F., Putro, G. P., & Gasteiger, H. A.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- F458-F464
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2940789693
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OER Catalyst Stability Investigation Using RDE Technique: A Stability Measure or an Artifact? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.0301908jes
- The paper
- El-Sayed, H. A., Weiß, A., Olbrich, L. F., Putro, G. P., & Gasteiger, H. A. (2019). OER Catalyst Stability Investigation Using RDE Technique: A Stability Measure or an Artifact? Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0301908jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.