The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calendar Aging of Lithium-Ion Batteries: I. Impact of the Graphite Anode on Capacity Fade
Open accessAbstract
In this study, the calendar aging of lithium-ion batteries is investigated at different temperatures for 16 states of charge (SoCs) from 0 to 100%. Three types of 18650 lithium-ion cells, containing different cathode materials, have been examined. Our study demonstrates that calendar aging does not increase steadily with the SoC. Instead, plateau regions, covering SoC intervals of more than 20%–30% of the cell capacity, are observed wherein the capacity fade is similar. Differential voltage analyses confirm that the capacity fade is mainly caused by a shift in the electrode balancing. Furthermore, our study reveals the high impact of the graphite electrode on calendar aging. Lower anode potentials, which aggravate electrolyte reduction and thus promote solid electrolyte interphase growth, have been identified as the main driver of capacity fade during storage. In the high SoC regime where the graphite anode is lithiated more than 50%, the low anode potential accelerates the loss of cyclable lithium, which in turn distorts the electrode balancing. Aging mechanisms induced by high cell potential, such as electrolyte oxidation or transition-metal dissolution, seem to play only a minor role. To maximize battery life, high storage SoCs corresponding to low anode potential should be avoided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Through the progression of each peak in IC/DV curves throughout ageing, and observing the change of the active materials over time, degradation mechanism can be distinguished [52].”
From Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review (2019) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries
Vetter, J., Novák, P., Wagner, M. R., Veit, C., Möller, K.-C., Besenhard, J. O., Winter, M., Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M., Vogler, C., & Hammouche, A. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.006 · Cited by 3,987
Main aging mechanisms in Li ion batteries
Broussely, M., Biensan, P., Bonhomme, F., Blanchard, P., Herreyre, S., Nechev, K., & Staniewicz, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.172 · Cited by 1,162
Ohzuku, T., Iwakoshi, Y., & Sawai, K. (1993) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2220849 · Cited by 1,095
Synthesize battery degradation modes via a diagnostic and prognostic model
Dubarry, M., Truchot, C., & Liaw, B. Y. (2012) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.016 · Cited by 1,065
Calendar and cycle life study of Li(NiMnCo)O2-based 18650 lithium-ion batteries
Ecker, M., Nieto, N., Käbitz, S., Schmalstieg, J., Blanke, H., Warnecke, A., & Sauer, D. U. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.143 · Cited by 809
Structure and performance of LiFePO4 cathode materials: A review
Zhang, W. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.11.113 · Cited by 774
Aging mechanism in Li ion cells and calendar life predictions
Broussely, M., Herreyre, S., Biensan, P., Kasztejna, P., Nechev, K., & Staniewicz, R. J. (2001) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00722-4 · Cited by 728
An accelerated calendar and cycle life study of Li-ion cells
Bloom, I., Cole, B., Sohn, J.-B., Jones, S. A., Polzin, E. G., Battaglia, V., Henriksen, G. L., Motloch, C. G., Richardson, R., Unkelhaeuser, T., et al. (2001) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/s0378-7753(01)00783-2 · Cited by 623
Differential voltage analyses of high-power, lithium-ion cells
Bloom, I., Jansen, A. N., Abraham, D. P., Knuth, J., Jones, S. A., Battaglia, V. S., & Henriksen, G. L. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.07.021 · Cited by 585
Keil, P., & Jossen, A. (2016) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2016.02.005 · Cited by 482
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review
Li, Y., Liu, K., Foley, A. M., Zülke, A., Berecibar, M., Nanini-Maury, E., Van Mierlo, J., & Hoster, H. E. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109254 · Cited by 1,193
Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning
Attia, P. M., Grover, A., Jin, N., Severson, K. A., Markov, T. M., Liao, Y.-H., Chen, M. H., Cheong, B., Perkins, N., Yang, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1994-5 · Cited by 1,180
Hesse, H. C., Schimpe, M., Kucevic, D., & Jossen, A. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10122107 · Cited by 839
Self-citationDegradation of Commercial Lithium-Ion Cells as a Function of Chemistry and Cycling Conditions
Preger, Y., Barkholtz, H. M., Fresquez, A., Campbell, D. L., Juba, B. W., Kustas, J., Ferreira, S. R., & Chalamala, B. R. (2020) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1945-7111/abae37 · Cited by 621
Li, Y., Abdel-Monem, M., Gopalakrishnan, R., Berecibar, M., Nanini-Maury, E., Omar, N., van den Bossche, P., & Van Mierlo, J. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.10.092 · Cited by 531
Metadata
- Authors
- Keil, P., Schuster, S. F., Wilhelm, J., Travi, J., Hauser, A., Karl, R. C., & Jossen, A.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- TUM CREATE (SG)
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- A1872-A1880
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2464273419
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 1
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Keywords
- calendar aging, lithium-ion batteries, storage temperature, state of charge, capacity fade, 18650 cells, cathode materials, graphite anode, solid electrolyte interphase, electrolyte reduction, anode potential, electrolyte oxidation, transition metal dissolution, battery energy storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
