Cited by 141Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Catalyst Poisoning Property of Sulfonimide Acid Ionomer on Pt (111) Surface

Open access
Kodama, Kensaku, Shinohara, Akihiro, Hasegawa, Naoki, Shinozaki, Kazuma, Jinnouchi, Ryosuke, Suzuki, Takahisa, Hatanaka, Tatsuya, Morimoto, Yu·2014·Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract

The catalyst poisoning property of a novel ionomer, NBC4, which has two sulfonimide acid groups in its side chain ended with a perfluorobutane, instead of sulfonic acid groups as Nafion does, was theoretically and experimentally compared with that of Nafion. A density functional theory combined with a continuum electrolyte theory showed that the adsorption is weaker for sulfonimide anion than for sulfonate anion on Pt (111) surface. Electrochemical measurements using Pt (111) surfaced single crystal electrodes covered with the ionomer films showed the weaker anion adsorption and higher ORR activity by ca. 50% at 0.82 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode for NBC4 than for Nafion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1149/2.051405jes

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interfacial structure depends on the surface properties of the catalyst (such as the concentration of Pt and the crystallinity of the carbon support), thus changing the physical properties of the ionomer, which in turn affects the water absorption, proton conductivity, and gas permeability at the interface.

    “Therefore, the interfacial structure depends on the surface properties of the catalyst (such as the concentration of Pt and the crystallinity of the carbon support), thus changing the physical properties of the ionomer, which in turn affects the water absorption, proton conductivity, and gas permeability at the interface [103,104].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kodama, K., Shinohara, A., Hasegawa, N., Shinozaki, K., Jinnouchi, R., Suzuki, T., Hatanaka, T., & Morimoto, Y.
Affiliations
Toyota Central Research and Development Laboratories (Japan) (JP)
Venue
Journal of The Electrochemical Society
Published
2014
Volume
161
Issue
5
Pages
F649-F652
ISSN
  • 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7111
OpenAlex
W2113263292
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of The Electrochemical Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Keywords
Nafion, catalyst poisoning, Pt(111), anion adsorption, sulfonate anions, oxygen reduction reaction, proton exchange membranes, ionomer films

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review