The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluating Si-Based Materials for Li-Ion Batteries in Commercially Relevant Negative Electrodes
Open accessAbstract
Methods and criteria for assessing the commercial viability of Si-based materials are discussed and demonstrated with the 3M V6 alloy and 60 nm nano Si powder. These materials are firstly evaluated through the cycling of neat electrodes containing only alloy and binder to characterize the capacity, first cycle efficiency, binder compatibility, and microstructure stability of the material. The alloy displays higher first cycle efficiency, lower fade, and a more stable amorphous microstructure compared to the nano Si, which displays a variable microstructure with a rate dependent presence of crystalline Li 15 Si 4 . The materials are then evaluated in graphite-containing composite electrodes having high areal capacities (> 2 mAh/cm 2 ). In a well designed composite electrode including carbon nanotubes, 3M V6 material was found to cycle with little fade and high coulombic efficiency (∼99.8%) while maintaining a stable dQ/dV. A composite electrode of equivalent volumetric capacity with nano Si powder shows similar capacity retention over 50 cycles but an unacceptably low coulombic efficiency (∼99.2%). High precision coulometry and calorimetry results show surface area as the dominant factor in levels of parasitic reactions with Si based materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Asenbauer, J., Eisenmann, T., Kuenzel, M., Kazzazi, A., Chen, Z., & Bresser, D. (2020) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/d0se00175a · Cited by 1,295
Higgins, T. M., Park, S.-H., King, P. J., Zhang, C. (., McEvoy, N., Berner, N. C., Daly, D., Shmeliov, A., Khan, U., Duesberg, G., et al. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b00218 · Cited by 481
Nguyen, C. C., & Lucht, B. L. (2014) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0731412jes · Cited by 281
Nölle, R., Beltrop, K., Holtstiege, F., Kasnatscheew, J., Placke, T., & Winter, M. (2020) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2019.07.002 · Cited by 258
High mass loading, binder-free MXene anodes for high areal capacity Li-ion batteries
Kim, S. J., Naguib, M., Zhao, M., Zhang, C., Jung, H.-T., Barsoum, M. W., & Gogotsi, Y. (2015) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.132 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Chevrier, V. L., Liu, L., Le, D. B., Lund, J., Molla, B., Reimer, K., Krause, L. J., Jensen, L. D., Figgemeier, E., & Eberman, K. W.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- A783-A791
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2028872506
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating Si-Based Materials for Li-Ion Batteries in Commercially Relevant Negative Electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.066405jes
- The paper
- Chevrier, V. L., Liu, L., Le, D. B., Lund, J., Molla, B., Reimer, K., Krause, L. J., Jensen, L. D., Figgemeier, E., & Eberman, K. W. (2014). Evaluating Si-Based Materials for Li-Ion Batteries in Commercially Relevant Negative Electrodes. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.066405jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.