The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theory of Impedance Response of Porous Electrodes: Simplifications, Inhomogeneities, Non-Stationarities and Applications
Open accessAbstract
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is a convenient and powerful tool in characterizing porous electrodes in electrochemical systems. The full potential of impedance characterization can only be achieved when a physically meaningful impedance model is used. This study aims to build a theoretically-consistent framework and to develop a series of impedance models for porous electrodes with different properties. The framework starts from a full problem formulated with the concentrated solution theory and then simplifies it to four limiting cases. In-plane, through-plane, multi-dimensional inhomogeneities are considered. In addition, based on the analytical Fourier transform, the impedance response during dynamic process is numerically calculated. The models developed in this study are then applied to three typical cases: blocking electrode, electrode with faradaic reactions, and electrode constituted of particles with insertion reactions, corresponding to their practical counterparts in electrochemical capacitors, polymer electrolyte fuel cells, and lithium-ion batteries, respectively. In each case, the structure, asymptotic behaviors, and characteristic frequencies of and inhomogeneous effects on the impedance spectrum are analyzed. Special attention is paid to the assumptions and applicability of each model. Experimental strategies to justify the use of an electric circuit model are discussed. The use of Warburg impedance to fit the diffusion coefficient in the solid active particles is scrutinized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kirkpatrick, S. (1973) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.45.574 · Cited by 5,260
Modeling of Galvanostatic Charge and Discharge of the Lithium/Polymer/Insertion Cell
Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F., & Newman, J. (1993) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2221597 · Cited by 4,328
A comparative study of equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries
Hu, X., Li, S., & Peng, H. (2012) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.013 · Cited by 2,179
Soboleva, T., Zhao, X., Malek, K., Xie, Z., Navessin, T., & Holdcroft, S. (2010) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am900600y · Cited by 424
Cited by
Impedance Analysis of Electrochemical Systems
Vivier, V., & Orazem, M. E. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00876 · Cited by 615
Huang, J. (2018) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.136 · Cited by 469
Self-citationUnderstanding Li-based battery materials via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Gaberšček, M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26894-5 · Cited by 426
Zhou, X., Huang, J., Pan, Z., & Ouyang, M. (2019) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.04.040 · Cited by 355
Self-citationImpedance spectroscopy of battery cells: Theory versus experiment
Gaberšček, M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Electrochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100917 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, J., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- A1983-A2000
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2467653293
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of Impedance Response of Porous Electrodes: Simplifications, Inhomogeneities, Non-Stationarities and Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.0901609jes
- The paper
- Huang, J., & Zhang, J. (2016). Theory of Impedance Response of Porous Electrodes: Simplifications, Inhomogeneities, Non-Stationarities and Applications. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0901609jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.