The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Review—Identifying Critical Gaps for Polymer Electrolyte Water Electrolysis Development
Open accessAbstract
Although polymer electrolyte water electrolyzers (PEWEs) have been used in small-scale (kW to tens of kW range) applications for several decades, PEWE technology for hydrogen production in energy applications (power-to-gas, power-to-fuel, etc.) requires significant improvements in the technology to address the challenges associated with cost, performance and durability.Systems with power of hundreds of kW or even MWs, corresponding to hydrogen production rates of around 10 to 20 kg/h, have started to appear in the past 5 years.The thin (∼0.2 mm) polymer electrolyte in the PEWE with low ohmic resistance, compared to the alkaline cell with liquid electrolyte, allows operation at high current densities of 1-3 A/cm 2 and high differential pressure.This article, after an introductory overview of the operating principles of PEWE and state-of-the-art, discusses the state of understanding of key phenomena determining and limiting performance, durability, and commercial readiness, identifies important 'gaps' in understanding and essential development needs to bring PEWE science & engineering forward to prosper in the energy market as one of its future backbone technologies.For this to be successful, science, engineering, and process development as well as business and market development need to go hand in hand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crabtree, G. W., Dresselhaus, M. S., & Buchanan, M. V. (2004) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.1878333 · Cited by 1,610
Developments and perspectives of oxide-based catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction
Fabbri, E., Habereder, A., Waltar, K., Kötz, R., & Schmidt, T. J. (2014) · Catal. Sci. Technol. · doi:10.1039/c4cy00669k · Cited by 1,303
Self-citationKongkanand, A., & Mathias, M. F. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00216 · Cited by 1,202
Advanced materials for improved PEMFC performance and life
Curtin, D. E., Lousenberg, R. D., Henry, T. J., Tangeman, P. C., & Tisack, M. E. (2004) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.023 · Cited by 786
Zamel, N., & Li, X. (2013) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2012.07.002 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Environment: Material Challenges and Solutions
Xie, X., Du, L., Yan, L., Park, S., Qiu, Y., Sokolowski, J., Wang, W., & Shao, Y. (2022) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202110036 · Cited by 792
Chen, R., Hung, S., Zhou, D., Gao, J., Yang, C., Tao, H., Yang, H. B., Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Xiong, Q., et al. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201903909 · Cited by 624
Durability of anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers
Li, D., Motz, A. R., Bae, C., Fujimoto, C., Yang, G., Zhang, F.-Y., Ayers, K. E., & Kim, Y. S. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee04086j · Cited by 601
Bareiß, K., de la Rua, C., Möckl, M., & Hamacher, T. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.001 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Babic, U., Suermann, M., Büchi, F. N., Gubler, L., & Schmidt, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of The Electrochemical Society
- Publisher
- The Electrochemical Society
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- F387-F399
- ISSN
- 0013-4651 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7111
- OpenAlex
- W2591485117
- Cited by
- 564
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Review—Identifying Critical Gaps for Polymer Electrolyte Water Electrolysis Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1149/2.1441704jes
- The paper
- Babic, U., Suermann, M., Büchi, F. N., Gubler, L., & Schmidt, T. J. (2017). Critical Review—Identifying Critical Gaps for Polymer Electrolyte Water Electrolysis Development. Journal of The Electrochemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1441704jes
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.