Cited by 108Organizational Change and LeadershipOrganizational Management and ChangeHealth Policy Implementation Science

Assessing Organizational Functioning as a Step Toward Innovation

Open access
Simpson, D. Dwayne, Dansereau, Donald·2007·Science & Practice Perspectives

Abstract

Innovate and adapt are watchwords for substance abuse treatment programs in today's environment of legislative mandates, effective new interventions, and competition. Organizations are having to evolve - ready or not - and those that are ready have superior chances for success and survival. The Texas Christian University Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) survey is a free instrument, with supporting materials, that substance abuse treatment programs use to assess organizational traits that can facilitate or hinder efforts at transition. This article presents organizational change as a three-stage process of adopting, implementing, and routinizing new procedures; describes the use of the ORC; and outlines a step-by-step procedure for clearing away potential obstacles before setting forth on the road to improved practices and outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1151/spp073220

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Established high quality discussions and informal clear communications positively affect implementation effectiveness.

    “This finding is supported by Simpson and Dansereau (71) study that suggests established, high quality discussions, as well as informal, clear communications, positively affect implementation effectiveness.”

    From Barriers and facilitators to implementation of developmental screening and early intervention in Canadian organizations following completion of a training and coaching model: a thematic analysis (2023) · cites this paper as Simpson and Dansereau (71)

    In “The Path to Change” (page not provided), the paper says time for participant discussion improves a program’s chances of implementing an innovation. In “Step 1: Select Goals” (page not provided), it presents clearer communication as a way to improve change readiness. It does not establish that high-quality discussions or informal, clear communications positively affect implementation effectiveness specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Backer TE Backer TE David SL Soucy G 1995 Assessing and enhancing readiness for change: Implications for technology transfer Reviewing the Behavioral Science Knowledge Base on Technology Transfer (NIDA Research Monograph 155, NIH Publication No. 95-4035) Rockville, MD National Institute on Drug Abuse 8594459
  2. Brown BS Flynn PM 2002 The federal role in drug abuse technology transfer: A history and perspective Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 22 4 245 257 12072168
  3. Dansereau DF Dees SM 2002 Mapping training: The transfer of a cognitive technology for improving counseling Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 22 4 219 230 12072166
  4. Joe GW 2002 Measuring patient attributes and engagement in treatment Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 22 4 183 196 12072163
  5. Newbern D Dansereau DF Wiig K 1995 Knowledge maps for knowledge management Knowledge Management Methods 157 180 Arlington, TX Schema Press
  6. Rogers EM 1995 Diffusion of Innovations 4th ed New York The Free Press
  7. Roman PM Johnson JA 2002 Adoption and implementation of new technologies in substance abuse treatment Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 22 4 211 218 12072165
  8. Simpson DD 2004 A conceptual framework for drug treatment process and outcomes Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 27 2 99 121 15450644
  9. Simpson DD Brown BS 2002 Special Issue: Transferring research to practice Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 22 4 12072162
  10. Simpson DD Flynn PM 2007a Organizational Readiness for Change (Special Issue) Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment In press 12072164
  11. Simpson DD Flynn PM 2007b Moving innovations into treatment: A stage-based approach to program change Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment In press PMC1995028 17434704

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simpson, D. D., & Dansereau, D.
Affiliations
Texas Christian University (US)
Corresponding author
Simpson, D. Dwayne
Venue
Science & Practice Perspectives
Published
2007-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
20-28
ISSN
  • 1930-4307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-4315
OpenAlex
W2037225987
Cited by
108
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science & Practice Perspectives (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R37DA013093, R37DA13093, R01 DA06162, R01DA006162)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
organizational preparedness, addiction treatment programs, organizational change, innovation, organizational functioning, organizational adaptation, Texas Christian University
MeSH terms
Humans, Management Audit, Organizational Innovation, Organizational Objectives, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Program Evaluation, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review