Cited by 166Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationHealthcare Quality and Management

The sustainability of healthcare innovations: a concept analysis

Fleiszer, Andrea R., Semenic, Sonia E., Ritchie, Judith A., Richer, Marie‐Claire, Denis, Jean‐Louis·2015·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Aim: To report on an analysis of the concept of the sustainability of healthcare innovations. Background: While there have been significant empirical, theoretical and practical contributions made towards the development and implementation of healthcare innovations, there has been less attention paid to their sustainability. Yet many desired healthcare innovations are not sustained over the long term. There is a need to increase clarity around the concept of innovation sustainability to guide the advancement of knowledge on this topic. Design: Concept analysis. Data sources: We included literature reviews, theoretical and empirical articles, books and grey literature obtained through database searching (ABI/INFORM, Academic Search Complete, Business Source Complete,CINAHL, Embase,MEDLINE and Web of Science) from 1996–May 2014, reference harvesting and citation searching. Methods: We examined sources according to terms and definitions, characteristics, preconditions, outcomes and boundaries to evaluate the maturity of the concept. Results: This concept is partially mature. Healthcare innovation sustainability remains a multi‐dimensional, multi‐factorial notion that is used inconsistently or ambiguously and takes on different meanings at different times in different contexts. We propose a broad conceptualization that consists of three characteristics: benefits, routinization or institutionalization, and development. We also suggest that sustained innovations are influenced by a variety of preconditions or factors, which are innovation‐, context‐, leadership‐ and process‐related. Conclusion: Further conceptual development is essential to continue advancing our understanding of the sustainability of healthcare innovations, especially in nursing where this topic remains largely unexplored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jan.12633

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleiszer, A. R., Semenic, S. E., Ritchie, J. A., Richer, M., & Denis, J.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • École Nationale d'Administration Publique (CA)
Corresponding author
Fleiszer, Andrea R.
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-02-24
Volume
71
Issue
7
Pages
1484-1498
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2164235841
Cited by
166
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • The McGill University Health Centre Research Institute
  • Centre FERASI
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec - santé
  • McGill University
  • Canadian Nurses’ Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
healthcare innovation, innovation sustainability, conceptual analysis, routinization, institutionalization, leadership
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Organizational Innovation, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review